Jingwen Wang, Bernhard Angele, Guojie Ma, Xingshan Li
{"title":"重复导致混淆:汉语阅读中的分词分析。","authors":"Jingwen Wang, Bernhard Angele, Guojie Ma, Xingshan Li","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since there are no spaces between words to mark word boundaries in Chinese, it is common to see 2 identical neighboring characters in natural text. Usually, this occurs when there are 2 adjacent words containing the same character (we will call such a coincidental sequence of 2 identical characters <i>repeated characters</i>). In the present study, we examined how Chinese readers process words when there are repeated characters. In 3 experiments, we compared how Chinese readers process 4-character strings including 2 repeated characters (e.g. , pinyin: xíngdòng dòngjī, meaning <i>behavioral motivation</i>) with a control condition where none of the characters repeat (e.g. , pinyin: xíngdòng yùwàng, meaning <i>behavioral desire</i>). In Experiment 1, the 4-character strings were presented for 40 ms and participants were asked to report as many characters as possible. Participants reported the second and third characters less accurately in the repeated condition than the control condition. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we embedded 2 different types of 4-character strings, compound Chinese characters and simple Chinese characters, into the same sentence frames, and asked participants to read these sentences normally. Gaze duration and total time on the second word were significantly longer in the repeated condition. These results suggest that the repeated characters increased the difficulty of word processing. Moreover, the results are consistent with the predictions of serial models, which assumes that words are processed serially in reading. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":504300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"147-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetition causes confusion: Insights to word segmentation during Chinese reading.\",\"authors\":\"Jingwen Wang, Bernhard Angele, Guojie Ma, Xingshan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0000817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since there are no spaces between words to mark word boundaries in Chinese, it is common to see 2 identical neighboring characters in natural text. Usually, this occurs when there are 2 adjacent words containing the same character (we will call such a coincidental sequence of 2 identical characters <i>repeated characters</i>). In the present study, we examined how Chinese readers process words when there are repeated characters. In 3 experiments, we compared how Chinese readers process 4-character strings including 2 repeated characters (e.g. , pinyin: xíngdòng dòngjī, meaning <i>behavioral motivation</i>) with a control condition where none of the characters repeat (e.g. , pinyin: xíngdòng yùwàng, meaning <i>behavioral desire</i>). In Experiment 1, the 4-character strings were presented for 40 ms and participants were asked to report as many characters as possible. Participants reported the second and third characters less accurately in the repeated condition than the control condition. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we embedded 2 different types of 4-character strings, compound Chinese characters and simple Chinese characters, into the same sentence frames, and asked participants to read these sentences normally. Gaze duration and total time on the second word were significantly longer in the repeated condition. These results suggest that the repeated characters increased the difficulty of word processing. Moreover, the results are consistent with the predictions of serial models, which assumes that words are processed serially in reading. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":504300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"147-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
由于中文没有空格来标记词的边界,所以在自然文本中经常看到两个相同的相邻字符。通常,当有两个相邻的单词包含相同的字符时,就会发生这种情况(我们将这种两个相同字符的巧合序列称为重复字符)。在本研究中,我们考察了汉语读者在有重复字符的情况下对单词的处理。在3个实验中,我们比较了中文读者处理包含2个重复字符(如拼音:xíngdòng dòngjī,意思行为动机)和不重复字符(如拼音:xíngdòng yùwàng,意思行为欲望)的4个字符字符串的方式。在实验1中,4个字符的字符串被呈现40毫秒,参与者被要求尽可能多地报告字符。参与者在重复条件下报告第二个和第三个字符的准确性低于对照条件。在实验2A和2B中,我们将复合汉字和简单汉字两种不同类型的4字串嵌入到相同的句子框架中,并要求被试正常阅读这些句子。在重复条件下,注视第二个单词的持续时间和总时间明显更长。这些结果表明,重复字符增加了文字处理的难度。此外,该结果与序列模型的预测一致,该模型假设单词在阅读过程中是连续处理的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
Repetition causes confusion: Insights to word segmentation during Chinese reading.
Since there are no spaces between words to mark word boundaries in Chinese, it is common to see 2 identical neighboring characters in natural text. Usually, this occurs when there are 2 adjacent words containing the same character (we will call such a coincidental sequence of 2 identical characters repeated characters). In the present study, we examined how Chinese readers process words when there are repeated characters. In 3 experiments, we compared how Chinese readers process 4-character strings including 2 repeated characters (e.g. , pinyin: xíngdòng dòngjī, meaning behavioral motivation) with a control condition where none of the characters repeat (e.g. , pinyin: xíngdòng yùwàng, meaning behavioral desire). In Experiment 1, the 4-character strings were presented for 40 ms and participants were asked to report as many characters as possible. Participants reported the second and third characters less accurately in the repeated condition than the control condition. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we embedded 2 different types of 4-character strings, compound Chinese characters and simple Chinese characters, into the same sentence frames, and asked participants to read these sentences normally. Gaze duration and total time on the second word were significantly longer in the repeated condition. These results suggest that the repeated characters increased the difficulty of word processing. Moreover, the results are consistent with the predictions of serial models, which assumes that words are processed serially in reading. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).