机器人辅助根治性胆囊切除术在印度大容量三级肿瘤中心的疗效。

Mahesh Goel, Sagar R Kurunkar, Amol Kanetkar, Shraddha Patkar
{"title":"机器人辅助根治性胆囊切除术在印度大容量三级肿瘤中心的疗效。","authors":"Mahesh Goel,&nbsp;Sagar R Kurunkar,&nbsp;Amol Kanetkar,&nbsp;Shraddha Patkar","doi":"10.1089/vor.2018.0539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Minimally invasive radical cholecystectomy is a complex laparoscopy. Robotic surgery is now an option to complete a radical cholecystectomy because of its high definition, magnified three-dimensional view of the operative field, and articulating instrumentation.<sup>1-3</sup> Robotic surgery enables a safe dissection in otherwise difficult to access areas such as the porta hepatis. This video reviews the role of robotic surgery in the management of gall bladder (GB) malignancy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A 28-year-old lady, with no comorbidities, presented with abdominal pain and underwent an evaluation with a contrast-enhanced CT scan of chest and abdomen. The CT scan revealed a mass in the GB with no evidence of distant metastases. Liver function tests were normal and a CA19-9 was 898 U/mL. A robotic radical cholecystectomy using five ports (four robotic and one assistant port) was performed. The procedure started by clearing the hepatoduodenal ligament nodes (stations 8, 12, and 13 with interaortocaval node sampling). The triangle of Calot was then dissected and secured with clips. Next a wide excision of segments 4b and 5 was performed including the GB. The complete specimen was extracted in a bag from a small incision at the assistant port. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The procedure was performed in 330 minutes with a blood loss of 200 mL. There were no perioperative complications and the postoperative stay was 3 days. Final histopathology report revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of GB invading serosa (pT3) with negative margins and 4 out of 14 lymph nodes showed presence of metastases. The overall cohort shows 22 robotic radical cholecystectomies for GB malignancy. The median age was 53 years. The average duration of surgery was 270 minutes with a median blood loss of 120 mL. The median postoperative stay was 4 days and the median nodal yield for radical cholecystectomy was 8. The overall median survival at 18 months was 100% with one recurrent hepatic lesion. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Robotic radical cholecystectomy may offer technical superiority over laparoscopic surgery and is an oncologically acceptable approach with good short-term oncologic outcomes. This type of surgery may require a highly specialized center with adequate experience in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. <i>No competing financial interests exist.</i> Runtime of video: 9 mins 5 secs.</p>","PeriodicalId":92924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part B, Videoscopy","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/vor.2018.0539","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Robot-Assisted Radical Cholecystectomy in a High-Volume Tertiary Cancer Center in India.\",\"authors\":\"Mahesh Goel,&nbsp;Sagar R Kurunkar,&nbsp;Amol Kanetkar,&nbsp;Shraddha Patkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/vor.2018.0539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Minimally invasive radical cholecystectomy is a complex laparoscopy. Robotic surgery is now an option to complete a radical cholecystectomy because of its high definition, magnified three-dimensional view of the operative field, and articulating instrumentation.<sup>1-3</sup> Robotic surgery enables a safe dissection in otherwise difficult to access areas such as the porta hepatis. This video reviews the role of robotic surgery in the management of gall bladder (GB) malignancy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A 28-year-old lady, with no comorbidities, presented with abdominal pain and underwent an evaluation with a contrast-enhanced CT scan of chest and abdomen. The CT scan revealed a mass in the GB with no evidence of distant metastases. Liver function tests were normal and a CA19-9 was 898 U/mL. A robotic radical cholecystectomy using five ports (four robotic and one assistant port) was performed. The procedure started by clearing the hepatoduodenal ligament nodes (stations 8, 12, and 13 with interaortocaval node sampling). The triangle of Calot was then dissected and secured with clips. Next a wide excision of segments 4b and 5 was performed including the GB. The complete specimen was extracted in a bag from a small incision at the assistant port. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The procedure was performed in 330 minutes with a blood loss of 200 mL. There were no perioperative complications and the postoperative stay was 3 days. Final histopathology report revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of GB invading serosa (pT3) with negative margins and 4 out of 14 lymph nodes showed presence of metastases. The overall cohort shows 22 robotic radical cholecystectomies for GB malignancy. The median age was 53 years. The average duration of surgery was 270 minutes with a median blood loss of 120 mL. The median postoperative stay was 4 days and the median nodal yield for radical cholecystectomy was 8. The overall median survival at 18 months was 100% with one recurrent hepatic lesion. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Robotic radical cholecystectomy may offer technical superiority over laparoscopic surgery and is an oncologically acceptable approach with good short-term oncologic outcomes. This type of surgery may require a highly specialized center with adequate experience in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. <i>No competing financial interests exist.</i> Runtime of video: 9 mins 5 secs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part B, Videoscopy\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/vor.2018.0539\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part B, Videoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/vor.2018.0539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part B, Videoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vor.2018.0539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

微创胆囊根治术是一项复杂的腹腔镜手术。机器人手术现在是完成根治性胆囊切除术的一种选择,因为它具有高清晰度、放大的手术野三维视图和关节器械。1-3机器人手术可以在难以进入的区域(如肝门)进行安全的解剖。本视频回顾了机器人手术在胆囊(GB)恶性肿瘤治疗中的作用。方法:一名28岁的女性,无合并症,表现为腹痛,接受胸部和腹部CT增强扫描评估。CT扫描显示GB肿块,无远处转移迹象。肝功能检查正常,CA19-9为898 U/mL。采用五个端口(四个机器人端口和一个辅助端口)进行机器人胆囊根治术。手术首先清除肝十二指肠韧带淋巴结(第8、12和13站进行腹主动脉间淋巴结取样)。然后解剖Calot三角并用夹子固定。接下来,广泛切除4b和5段,包括GB。从辅助口的一个小切口取出完整的标本。结果:手术在330分钟内完成,出血量200 mL。无围手术期并发症,术后住院时间3天。最终的组织病理学报告显示:GB浸润浆膜中分化腺癌(pT3),边缘呈阴性,14个淋巴结中有4个存在转移。整个队列显示22例机器人根治性胆囊切除术治疗GB恶性肿瘤。中位年龄为53岁。手术平均持续时间为270分钟,中位失血量为120毫升。术后中位住院时间为4天,根治性胆囊切除术的中位淋巴结率为8。18个月的总中位生存率为100%,伴有一次复发性肝脏病变。讨论:机器人根治性胆囊切除术可能比腹腔镜手术具有技术优势,是一种肿瘤学上可接受的方法,具有良好的短期肿瘤预后。这种类型的手术可能需要高度专业化的中心,在肝胆胰手术方面有足够的经验。不存在相互竞争的经济利益。影片时长:9分5秒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of Robot-Assisted Radical Cholecystectomy in a High-Volume Tertiary Cancer Center in India.

Introduction: Minimally invasive radical cholecystectomy is a complex laparoscopy. Robotic surgery is now an option to complete a radical cholecystectomy because of its high definition, magnified three-dimensional view of the operative field, and articulating instrumentation.1-3 Robotic surgery enables a safe dissection in otherwise difficult to access areas such as the porta hepatis. This video reviews the role of robotic surgery in the management of gall bladder (GB) malignancy. Methods: A 28-year-old lady, with no comorbidities, presented with abdominal pain and underwent an evaluation with a contrast-enhanced CT scan of chest and abdomen. The CT scan revealed a mass in the GB with no evidence of distant metastases. Liver function tests were normal and a CA19-9 was 898 U/mL. A robotic radical cholecystectomy using five ports (four robotic and one assistant port) was performed. The procedure started by clearing the hepatoduodenal ligament nodes (stations 8, 12, and 13 with interaortocaval node sampling). The triangle of Calot was then dissected and secured with clips. Next a wide excision of segments 4b and 5 was performed including the GB. The complete specimen was extracted in a bag from a small incision at the assistant port. Results: The procedure was performed in 330 minutes with a blood loss of 200 mL. There were no perioperative complications and the postoperative stay was 3 days. Final histopathology report revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of GB invading serosa (pT3) with negative margins and 4 out of 14 lymph nodes showed presence of metastases. The overall cohort shows 22 robotic radical cholecystectomies for GB malignancy. The median age was 53 years. The average duration of surgery was 270 minutes with a median blood loss of 120 mL. The median postoperative stay was 4 days and the median nodal yield for radical cholecystectomy was 8. The overall median survival at 18 months was 100% with one recurrent hepatic lesion. Discussion: Robotic radical cholecystectomy may offer technical superiority over laparoscopic surgery and is an oncologically acceptable approach with good short-term oncologic outcomes. This type of surgery may require a highly specialized center with adequate experience in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. No competing financial interests exist. Runtime of video: 9 mins 5 secs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信