一家三级癌症中心对胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者使用瑞戈非尼的毒性管理。

Clinical Sarcoma Research Pub Date : 2020-01-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13569-019-0123-4
Florence Chamberlain, Sheima Farag, Constance Williams-Sharkey, Cecilia Collingwood, Lucia Chen, Sonia Mansukhani, Bodil Engelmann, Omar Al-Muderis, Dharmisha Chauhan, Khin Thway, Cyril Fisher, Robin L Jones, Spyridon Gennatas, Charlotte Benson
{"title":"一家三级癌症中心对胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者使用瑞戈非尼的毒性管理。","authors":"Florence Chamberlain, Sheima Farag, Constance Williams-Sharkey, Cecilia Collingwood, Lucia Chen, Sonia Mansukhani, Bodil Engelmann, Omar Al-Muderis, Dharmisha Chauhan, Khin Thway, Cyril Fisher, Robin L Jones, Spyridon Gennatas, Charlotte Benson","doi":"10.1186/s13569-019-0123-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2-28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre.\",\"authors\":\"Florence Chamberlain, Sheima Farag, Constance Williams-Sharkey, Cecilia Collingwood, Lucia Chen, Sonia Mansukhani, Bodil Engelmann, Omar Al-Muderis, Dharmisha Chauhan, Khin Thway, Cyril Fisher, Robin L Jones, Spyridon Gennatas, Charlotte Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13569-019-0123-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2-28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-019-0123-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-019-0123-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景瑞戈非尼是一种多激酶抑制剂,已被批准作为转移性 GIST 的三线治疗药物。剂量限制性毒性反应经常出现,许多患者需要减少剂量。本研究旨在评估瑞戈非尼的毒性及其在实际GIST人群中的管理:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性审查,确定了2013年3月至2018年9月期间在本中心接受瑞戈非尼治疗的50例GIST患者:中位无进展生存期(PFS)为7.7个月[四分位距(IQR)为2.8-14.4个月]。从开始服用瑞戈非尼到死亡或最后一次随访的中位总生存期(OS)为15.7个月(IQR为9.2-28.4个月)。开始服用瑞戈非尼时,东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)的基线中位表现状态为1。停用瑞戈非尼的主要原因是疾病进展(PD)(31/50 [62%]),而不是毒性(10/50 [20%])。23/50(46%)例患者出现了3-4级不良事件(AEs);最常见的是掌跖红斑性肢痛症(PPE)(9/50(18%))。两名患者在接受瑞戈非尼治疗期间死于继发于败血症的多器官功能衰竭(4%)。19/50的患者(38%)需要减少剂量,8/50的患者(16%)由于合并症或担心个人毒性风险较高,开始使用的瑞戈非尼剂量低于推荐剂量(160毫克):尽管PD是患者中断治疗的主要原因,但瑞戈非尼的毒性管理和剂量仍然至关重要。与之前的研究相比,中位治疗持续时间更长,这表明瑞戈非尼可通过严格的毒性管理获得持久的临床获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre.

Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre.

Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre.

Background: Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population.

Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018.

Results: Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2-28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity.

Conclusion: Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信