肉类和海鲜摄入量的生物标志物:广泛的文献综述。

Genes & Nutrition Pub Date : 2019-12-30 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4
Cătălina Cuparencu, Giulia Praticó, Lieselot Y Hemeryck, Pedapati S C Sri Harsha, Stefania Noerman, Caroline Rombouts, Muyao Xi, Lynn Vanhaecke, Kati Hanhineva, Lorraine Brennan, Lars O Dragsted
{"title":"肉类和海鲜摄入量的生物标志物:广泛的文献综述。","authors":"Cătălina Cuparencu, Giulia Praticó, Lieselot Y Hemeryck, Pedapati S C Sri Harsha, Stefania Noerman, Caroline Rombouts, Muyao Xi, Lynn Vanhaecke, Kati Hanhineva, Lorraine Brennan, Lars O Dragsted","doi":"10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases<i>.</i> The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":12554,"journal":{"name":"Genes & Nutrition","volume":"14 ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Cătălina Cuparencu, Giulia Praticó, Lieselot Y Hemeryck, Pedapati S C Sri Harsha, Stefania Noerman, Caroline Rombouts, Muyao Xi, Lynn Vanhaecke, Kati Hanhineva, Lorraine Brennan, Lars O Dragsted\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases<i>.</i> The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6937850/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0656-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肉类,包括鱼类和贝类,是大多数均衡膳食的重要组成部分。食用不同种类的肉类和鱼类对健康既有好处也有坏处。白肉和鱼一般与积极的健康结果有关,而红肉,特别是加工肉类则与结肠直肠癌和其他疾病有关。这些食品对慢性疾病的发生或预防所起的作用仍未完全阐明。主要问题之一是难以正确评估肉类摄入量,因为现有的自我报告膳食评估工具可能不够精确,因此会受到系统误差和随机误差的影响。有人提出可以用生物液体中测量的膳食生物标志物来客观测量特定食物的实际摄入量,并为传统的评估方法提供支持。好的肉类摄入量生物标志物应能反映膳食中肉类的总摄入量,不受来源或加工方式的影响,并能区分肉类和其他富含蛋白质食物的摄入量;或者,肉类摄入量生物标志物应针对不同的肉类来源(如红肉与白肉;鱼肉、鸟肉或哺乳动物肉)和/或烹饪方法。在本文中,我们对科学文献进行了系统的调查,同时根据已公布的生物标志物审查指南(BFIrev),全面概述了不同类型肉类(包括鱼类和贝类)以及加工和加热肉类摄入量的可能生物标志物。最有前景的生物标志物将根据已公布的验证标准进一步验证其在膳食评估中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomarkers of meat and seafood intake: an extensive literature review.

Meat, including fish and shellfish, represents a valuable constituent of most balanced diets. Consumption of different types of meat and fish has been associated with both beneficial and adverse health effects. While white meats and fish are generally associated with positive health outcomes, red and especially processed meats have been associated with colorectal cancer and other diseases. The contribution of these foods to the development or prevention of chronic diseases is still not fully elucidated. One of the main problems is the difficulty in properly evaluating meat intake, as the existing self-reporting tools for dietary assessment may be imprecise and therefore affected by systematic and random errors. Dietary biomarkers measured in biological fluids have been proposed as possible objective measurements of the actual intake of specific foods and as a support for classical assessment methods. Good biomarkers for meat intake should reflect total dietary intake of meat, independent of source or processing and should be able to differentiate meat consumption from that of other protein-rich foods; alternatively, meat intake biomarkers should be specific to each of the different meat sources (e.g., red vs. white; fish, bird, or mammal) and/or cooking methods. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation of the scientific literature while providing a comprehensive overview of the possible biomarker(s) for the intake of different types of meat, including fish and shellfish, and processed and heated meats according to published guidelines for biomarker reviews (BFIrev). The most promising biomarkers are further validated for their usefulness for dietary assessment by published validation criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信