以早期并发症为重点的长期中心静脉导管五年数据报告。

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-12-10 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/6769506
Harald Lenz, Kirsti Myre, Tomas Draegni, Elizabeth Dorph
{"title":"以早期并发症为重点的长期中心静脉导管五年数据报告。","authors":"Harald Lenz, Kirsti Myre, Tomas Draegni, Elizabeth Dorph","doi":"10.1155/2019/6769506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term venous access has become the standard practice for the administration of chemotherapy, fluid therapy, antibiotics, and parenteral nutrition. The most commonly used methods are percutaneous puncture of the subclavian and internal jugular veins using the Seldinger technique or surgical cutdown of the cephalic vein.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is based on a quality registry including all long-term central venous catheter insertion procedures performed in patients >18 years at our department during a five-year period. The following data were registered: demographic data, main diagnosis and indications for the procedure, preoperative blood samples, type of catheter, the venous access used, and the procedure time. In addition, procedural and early postoperative complications were registered: unsuccessful procedures, malpositioned catheters, pneumothorax, hematoma complications, infections, nerve injuries, and wound ruptures. The Seldinger technique using anatomical landmarks at the left subclavian vein was the preferred access. Fluoroscopy was not used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand one hundred and one procedures were performed. In eight (0.7%) cases, the insertion of a catheter was not possible, 23 (2.1%) catheters were incorrectly positioned, twelve (1.1%) patients developed pneumothorax, nine (0.8%) developed hematoma, and three (0.27%) developed infection postoperatively. One (0.1%) patient suffered nerve injury, which totally recovered. No wound ruptures were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have a high success rate of first-attempt insertions compared with other published data, as well as an acceptable and low rate of pneumothorax, hematoma, and infections. However, the number of malpositioned catheters was relatively high. This could probably have been avoided with routine use of fluoroscopy during the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2019 ","pages":"6769506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Five-Year Data Report of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Focusing on Early Complications.\",\"authors\":\"Harald Lenz, Kirsti Myre, Tomas Draegni, Elizabeth Dorph\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2019/6769506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term venous access has become the standard practice for the administration of chemotherapy, fluid therapy, antibiotics, and parenteral nutrition. The most commonly used methods are percutaneous puncture of the subclavian and internal jugular veins using the Seldinger technique or surgical cutdown of the cephalic vein.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is based on a quality registry including all long-term central venous catheter insertion procedures performed in patients >18 years at our department during a five-year period. The following data were registered: demographic data, main diagnosis and indications for the procedure, preoperative blood samples, type of catheter, the venous access used, and the procedure time. In addition, procedural and early postoperative complications were registered: unsuccessful procedures, malpositioned catheters, pneumothorax, hematoma complications, infections, nerve injuries, and wound ruptures. The Seldinger technique using anatomical landmarks at the left subclavian vein was the preferred access. Fluoroscopy was not used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand one hundred and one procedures were performed. In eight (0.7%) cases, the insertion of a catheter was not possible, 23 (2.1%) catheters were incorrectly positioned, twelve (1.1%) patients developed pneumothorax, nine (0.8%) developed hematoma, and three (0.27%) developed infection postoperatively. One (0.1%) patient suffered nerve injury, which totally recovered. No wound ruptures were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have a high success rate of first-attempt insertions compared with other published data, as well as an acceptable and low rate of pneumothorax, hematoma, and infections. However, the number of malpositioned catheters was relatively high. This could probably have been avoided with routine use of fluoroscopy during the procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2019 \",\"pages\":\"6769506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925808/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6769506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6769506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长期静脉通路已成为给予化疗、液体治疗、抗生素和肠外营养的标准做法。最常用的方法是使用 Seldinger 技术经皮穿刺锁骨下静脉和颈内静脉,或手术切开头静脉:本研究基于一项质量登记,包括我科在五年内为 18 岁以上患者实施的所有长期中心静脉导管插入手术。登记的数据包括:人口统计学数据、主要诊断和手术适应症、术前血样、导管类型、使用的静脉通路以及手术时间。此外,还登记了手术和术后早期并发症:手术不成功、导管位置不当、气胸、血肿并发症、感染、神经损伤和伤口破裂。使用左锁骨下静脉解剖标志的 Seldinger 技术是首选入路。不使用透视:结果:共进行了 1101 例手术。8例(0.7%)患者无法插入导管,23例(2.1%)导管位置不正确,12例(1.1%)患者出现气胸,9例(0.8%)出现血肿,3例(0.27%)术后出现感染。一名(0.1%)患者神经损伤,但已完全恢复。没有观察到伤口破裂:与其他已发表的数据相比,我们首次尝试插入的成功率很高,气胸、血肿和感染的发生率也很低,可以接受。然而,导管位置错误的数量相对较高。如果在手术过程中常规使用透视技术,这种情况很可能可以避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Five-Year Data Report of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Focusing on Early Complications.

Background: Long-term venous access has become the standard practice for the administration of chemotherapy, fluid therapy, antibiotics, and parenteral nutrition. The most commonly used methods are percutaneous puncture of the subclavian and internal jugular veins using the Seldinger technique or surgical cutdown of the cephalic vein.

Methods: This study is based on a quality registry including all long-term central venous catheter insertion procedures performed in patients >18 years at our department during a five-year period. The following data were registered: demographic data, main diagnosis and indications for the procedure, preoperative blood samples, type of catheter, the venous access used, and the procedure time. In addition, procedural and early postoperative complications were registered: unsuccessful procedures, malpositioned catheters, pneumothorax, hematoma complications, infections, nerve injuries, and wound ruptures. The Seldinger technique using anatomical landmarks at the left subclavian vein was the preferred access. Fluoroscopy was not used.

Results: One thousand one hundred and one procedures were performed. In eight (0.7%) cases, the insertion of a catheter was not possible, 23 (2.1%) catheters were incorrectly positioned, twelve (1.1%) patients developed pneumothorax, nine (0.8%) developed hematoma, and three (0.27%) developed infection postoperatively. One (0.1%) patient suffered nerve injury, which totally recovered. No wound ruptures were observed.

Conclusions: We have a high success rate of first-attempt insertions compared with other published data, as well as an acceptable and low rate of pneumothorax, hematoma, and infections. However, the number of malpositioned catheters was relatively high. This could probably have been avoided with routine use of fluoroscopy during the procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信