贝伐单抗、顺铂和培美曲塞治疗EGFR野生型晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NS-NSCLC)的II期研究

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Shuji Murakami, Haruhiro Saito, Tetsuro Kondo, Fumihiro Oshita, Kouzo Yamada
{"title":"贝伐单抗、顺铂和培美曲塞治疗EGFR野生型晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NS-NSCLC)的II期研究","authors":"Shuji Murakami,&nbsp;Haruhiro Saito,&nbsp;Tetsuro Kondo,&nbsp;Fumihiro Oshita,&nbsp;Kouzo Yamada","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuation maintenance therapy with pemetrexed (PEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) following induction therapy with cisplatin (CDDP), PEM, and BEV is beneficial in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC), but the survival benefit of addition of BEV to CDDP/PEM as induction therapy is still unclear. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen in Japanese patients with EGFR wild-type NS-NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 25 patients who receive intravenous CDDP, PEM, and BEV (15 mg/kg) from August 2010 to February 2013. The primary endpoint of this study was the response rate (RR) and the secondary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median cycles of induction chemotherapy were four (range 1-6). RR was 64%. Most patients (64%) transitioned to maintenance therapy. The median PFS was 9.7 months. Median OS was 21.6 months. Haematological adverse events reaching grade 3 to 4 were neutropenia (8%) without febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia (4%), and anemia (4%). BEV-related non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4 were hypertension (16%), thrombosis (4%), and gastrointestinal perforation (4%). Each adverse events was controllable, and there were no treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen is effective and tolerable in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NS-NSCLC, but should be paid attention to some BEV-related toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Therapeutics and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) with EGFR wild-type.\",\"authors\":\"Shuji Murakami,&nbsp;Haruhiro Saito,&nbsp;Tetsuro Kondo,&nbsp;Fumihiro Oshita,&nbsp;Kouzo Yamada\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuation maintenance therapy with pemetrexed (PEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) following induction therapy with cisplatin (CDDP), PEM, and BEV is beneficial in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC), but the survival benefit of addition of BEV to CDDP/PEM as induction therapy is still unclear. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen in Japanese patients with EGFR wild-type NS-NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 25 patients who receive intravenous CDDP, PEM, and BEV (15 mg/kg) from August 2010 to February 2013. The primary endpoint of this study was the response rate (RR) and the secondary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median cycles of induction chemotherapy were four (range 1-6). RR was 64%. Most patients (64%) transitioned to maintenance therapy. The median PFS was 9.7 months. Median OS was 21.6 months. Haematological adverse events reaching grade 3 to 4 were neutropenia (8%) without febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia (4%), and anemia (4%). BEV-related non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4 were hypertension (16%), thrombosis (4%), and gastrointestinal perforation (4%). Each adverse events was controllable, and there were no treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen is effective and tolerable in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NS-NSCLC, but should be paid attention to some BEV-related toxicities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Therapeutics and Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Therapeutics and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Therapeutics and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:顺铂(CDDP)、PEM和BEV诱导治疗后继续使用培美曲塞(PEM)和贝伐单抗(BEV)维持治疗对晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NS-NSCLC)有益,但BEV在CDDP/PEM诱导治疗后的生存获益尚不清楚。这项II期研究的目的是评估CDDP/PEM/BEV方案在日本EGFR野生型NS-NSCLC患者中的可行性和安全性。患者和方法:本研究纳入了2010年8月至2013年2月接受静脉注射CDDP、PEM和BEV (15mg /kg)的25例患者。该研究的主要终点是缓解率(RR),次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。结果:诱导化疗的中位周期为4个(范围1-6)。RR为64%。大多数患者(64%)过渡到维持治疗。中位PFS为9.7个月。中位OS为21.6个月。达到3 - 4级的血液学不良事件包括无发热性中性粒细胞减少症(8%)、血小板减少症(4%)和贫血(4%)。3/4级bev相关的非血液学毒性包括高血压(16%)、血栓形成(4%)和胃肠道穿孔(4%)。所有不良事件均可控,无治疗相关死亡。结论:CDDP/PEM/BEV方案对EGFR野生型晚期NS-NSCLC患者有效且耐受,但应注意BEV相关的一些毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) with EGFR wild-type.

Background: Continuation maintenance therapy with pemetrexed (PEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) following induction therapy with cisplatin (CDDP), PEM, and BEV is beneficial in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC), but the survival benefit of addition of BEV to CDDP/PEM as induction therapy is still unclear. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen in Japanese patients with EGFR wild-type NS-NSCLC.

Patients and methods: This study included 25 patients who receive intravenous CDDP, PEM, and BEV (15 mg/kg) from August 2010 to February 2013. The primary endpoint of this study was the response rate (RR) and the secondary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: The median cycles of induction chemotherapy were four (range 1-6). RR was 64%. Most patients (64%) transitioned to maintenance therapy. The median PFS was 9.7 months. Median OS was 21.6 months. Haematological adverse events reaching grade 3 to 4 were neutropenia (8%) without febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia (4%), and anemia (4%). BEV-related non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4 were hypertension (16%), thrombosis (4%), and gastrointestinal perforation (4%). Each adverse events was controllable, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions: CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen is effective and tolerable in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NS-NSCLC, but should be paid attention to some BEV-related toxicities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信