做同样的事情,期待不同的结果:是时候质疑哲学和理论驱动的脊椎疗法研究了

Q3 Health Professions
Robert A. Leach DC, MS
{"title":"做同样的事情,期待不同的结果:是时候质疑哲学和理论驱动的脊椎疗法研究了","authors":"Robert A. Leach DC, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2019.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the philosophical and hypothetical underpinnings of chiropractic<span> and consider whether there is a need for chiropractic to have a questioning philosophy and theory-driven process to guide future scientific endeavors in the profession.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The earliest beliefs of the chiropractic founders centered on chiropractic vertebral subluxation<span> but differed on whether this was a static, bone-out-of-place misalignment or a lesion whereby joints had lost their normal direction or range of motion. More recently, new hypotheses such as dyskinesia, inflammation, and neuroplasticity attempt to explain the purported clinical effects of chiropractic. Yet practitioners and students advocate for both traditional viewpoints that typically tout misalignment and embrace a science of chiropractic. I propose that chiropractors<span> should not have to choose between philosophy and science. Instead, they should advocate for adoption of a modern questioning philosophy that not only informs their clinical questions and drives their theories, but also that is in turn influenced by outcomes from their research. Such a questioning philosophy is in stark contrast with the dogma that some have mislabeled as “philosophy” in the profession. I recommend that a review of chiropractic hypotheses and a theory-driven research process is needed to help guide the profession’s research agenda given its wide range of clinical activities and limited resources. As the chiropractic profession increasingly embraces evidence-informed practice, enhanced integration within the wider health care community may then result in further gains in utilization.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Theory-driven research that results from and subsequently informs a questioning philosophy may expose truths related to practice behaviors, activities, and outcomes, and spur more complete integration of chiropractic within the wider health care community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 60-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2019.08.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doing the Same Thing and Expecting a Different Outcome: It Is Time for a Questioning Philosophy and Theory-Driven Chiropractic Research\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Leach DC, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echu.2019.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the philosophical and hypothetical underpinnings of chiropractic<span> and consider whether there is a need for chiropractic to have a questioning philosophy and theory-driven process to guide future scientific endeavors in the profession.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The earliest beliefs of the chiropractic founders centered on chiropractic vertebral subluxation<span> but differed on whether this was a static, bone-out-of-place misalignment or a lesion whereby joints had lost their normal direction or range of motion. More recently, new hypotheses such as dyskinesia, inflammation, and neuroplasticity attempt to explain the purported clinical effects of chiropractic. Yet practitioners and students advocate for both traditional viewpoints that typically tout misalignment and embrace a science of chiropractic. I propose that chiropractors<span> should not have to choose between philosophy and science. Instead, they should advocate for adoption of a modern questioning philosophy that not only informs their clinical questions and drives their theories, but also that is in turn influenced by outcomes from their research. Such a questioning philosophy is in stark contrast with the dogma that some have mislabeled as “philosophy” in the profession. I recommend that a review of chiropractic hypotheses and a theory-driven research process is needed to help guide the profession’s research agenda given its wide range of clinical activities and limited resources. As the chiropractic profession increasingly embraces evidence-informed practice, enhanced integration within the wider health care community may then result in further gains in utilization.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Theory-driven research that results from and subsequently informs a questioning philosophy may expose truths related to practice behaviors, activities, and outcomes, and spur more complete integration of chiropractic within the wider health care community.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2019.08.002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349919300142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349919300142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本评论的目的是讨论脊椎指压疗法的哲学和假设基础,并考虑脊椎指压疗法是否需要有一个质疑哲学和理论驱动的过程,以指导该行业未来的科学努力。脊椎指压疗法创始人最早的信念集中在脊椎指压疗法的椎体半脱位上,但对于这是一种静态的、骨错位还是关节失去正常方向或活动范围的病变存在分歧。最近,新的假说,如运动障碍、炎症和神经可塑性,试图解释所谓的脊椎指压疗法的临床效果。然而,从业人员和学生都支持传统的观点,即通常鼓吹错位,并接受脊椎指压疗法的科学。我建议按摩师不应该在哲学和科学之间做出选择。相反,他们应该提倡采用一种现代的质疑哲学,这种哲学不仅可以为他们的临床问题提供信息,推动他们的理论,而且反过来也会受到他们研究结果的影响。这种质疑哲学与某些人错误地贴上“哲学”标签的教条形成鲜明对比。鉴于临床活动范围广泛,资源有限,我建议需要对脊椎指压疗法的假设和理论驱动的研究过程进行回顾,以帮助指导该专业的研究议程。随着脊椎指压专业越来越多地接受循证实践,在更广泛的卫生保健社区中加强整合可能会进一步提高利用率。结论:理论驱动的研究结果,并随后告知质疑哲学可能揭示与实践行为,活动和结果相关的真相,并促进脊椎指压治疗在更广泛的卫生保健社区中更全面的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doing the Same Thing and Expecting a Different Outcome: It Is Time for a Questioning Philosophy and Theory-Driven Chiropractic Research

Objective

The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the philosophical and hypothetical underpinnings of chiropractic and consider whether there is a need for chiropractic to have a questioning philosophy and theory-driven process to guide future scientific endeavors in the profession.

Discussion

The earliest beliefs of the chiropractic founders centered on chiropractic vertebral subluxation but differed on whether this was a static, bone-out-of-place misalignment or a lesion whereby joints had lost their normal direction or range of motion. More recently, new hypotheses such as dyskinesia, inflammation, and neuroplasticity attempt to explain the purported clinical effects of chiropractic. Yet practitioners and students advocate for both traditional viewpoints that typically tout misalignment and embrace a science of chiropractic. I propose that chiropractors should not have to choose between philosophy and science. Instead, they should advocate for adoption of a modern questioning philosophy that not only informs their clinical questions and drives their theories, but also that is in turn influenced by outcomes from their research. Such a questioning philosophy is in stark contrast with the dogma that some have mislabeled as “philosophy” in the profession. I recommend that a review of chiropractic hypotheses and a theory-driven research process is needed to help guide the profession’s research agenda given its wide range of clinical activities and limited resources. As the chiropractic profession increasingly embraces evidence-informed practice, enhanced integration within the wider health care community may then result in further gains in utilization.

Conclusion

Theory-driven research that results from and subsequently informs a questioning philosophy may expose truths related to practice behaviors, activities, and outcomes, and spur more complete integration of chiropractic within the wider health care community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信