撒哈拉以南非洲中等水平提供者宫内节育器插入的可行性和安全性。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Felix G Mhlanga, Jennifer E Balkus, Devika Singh, Catherine Chappell, Betty Kamira, Ishana Harkoo, Daniel Szydlo, Shorai Mukaka, Jeanna Piper, Sharon L Hillier
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲中等水平提供者宫内节育器插入的可行性和安全性。","authors":"Felix G Mhlanga,&nbsp;Jennifer E Balkus,&nbsp;Devika Singh,&nbsp;Catherine Chappell,&nbsp;Betty Kamira,&nbsp;Ishana Harkoo,&nbsp;Daniel Szydlo,&nbsp;Shorai Mukaka,&nbsp;Jeanna Piper,&nbsp;Sharon L Hillier","doi":"10.1363/45e8019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The copper IUD is safe and effective, but underutilized in Sub-Saharan Africa, in part because of a lack of trained providers. The World Health Organization recommends training mid-level providers-including nurses and midwives-to insert IUDs; however, the safety of such task shifting has not been evaluated in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from baseline surveys and study charts of 535 sexually active women aged 18-45 who used a copper IUD while participating in an HIV-prevention clinical trial conducted from August 2012 through June 2015 in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. IUDs were inserted by study physicians, nurses and midwives trained as part of the trial, and by local nonstudy providers. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare women's experiences of adverse events-such as irregular bleeding, pelvic pain or device expulsion-by provider type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (54%) of women reported experiencing an adverse event; the most common were irregular bleeding and pelvic pain (45% and 25%, respectively). Compared with women who had received an IUD from a study physician or study nurse, greater proportions of women who had received one from a nonstudy provider reported any adverse event (76% vs. 49% and 51%, respectively), irregular bleeding (57% vs. 41% and 45%) and pelvic pain (35% vs. 15% and 32%); the difference between study physicians and nurses was significant only for pelvic pain. Expulsion rates were comparable for study nurses and nonstudy providers (12.3 and 11.9 per 100 woman-years, respectively), but lower for study physicians (7.3 per 100 woman-years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support task shifting of IUD insertion to mid-level providers to improve IUD access in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":"45 ","pages":"61-69"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515488/pdf/nihms-1561096.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Safety of IUD Insertion by Mid-Level Providers in Sub-Saharan Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Felix G Mhlanga,&nbsp;Jennifer E Balkus,&nbsp;Devika Singh,&nbsp;Catherine Chappell,&nbsp;Betty Kamira,&nbsp;Ishana Harkoo,&nbsp;Daniel Szydlo,&nbsp;Shorai Mukaka,&nbsp;Jeanna Piper,&nbsp;Sharon L Hillier\",\"doi\":\"10.1363/45e8019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The copper IUD is safe and effective, but underutilized in Sub-Saharan Africa, in part because of a lack of trained providers. The World Health Organization recommends training mid-level providers-including nurses and midwives-to insert IUDs; however, the safety of such task shifting has not been evaluated in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from baseline surveys and study charts of 535 sexually active women aged 18-45 who used a copper IUD while participating in an HIV-prevention clinical trial conducted from August 2012 through June 2015 in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. IUDs were inserted by study physicians, nurses and midwives trained as part of the trial, and by local nonstudy providers. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare women's experiences of adverse events-such as irregular bleeding, pelvic pain or device expulsion-by provider type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (54%) of women reported experiencing an adverse event; the most common were irregular bleeding and pelvic pain (45% and 25%, respectively). Compared with women who had received an IUD from a study physician or study nurse, greater proportions of women who had received one from a nonstudy provider reported any adverse event (76% vs. 49% and 51%, respectively), irregular bleeding (57% vs. 41% and 45%) and pelvic pain (35% vs. 15% and 32%); the difference between study physicians and nurses was significant only for pelvic pain. Expulsion rates were comparable for study nurses and nonstudy providers (12.3 and 11.9 per 100 woman-years, respectively), but lower for study physicians (7.3 per 100 woman-years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support task shifting of IUD insertion to mid-level providers to improve IUD access in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"61-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515488/pdf/nihms-1561096.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1363/45e8019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/45e8019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:铜宫内节育器是安全有效的,但在撒哈拉以南非洲未得到充分利用,部分原因是缺乏训练有素的提供者。世界卫生组织建议培训中级人员——包括护士和助产士——如何插入宫内节育器;然而,这种任务转移的安全性尚未在撒哈拉以南非洲进行评估。方法:数据来自2012年8月至2015年6月在马拉维、南非、乌干达和津巴布韦参加hiv预防临床试验的535名18-45岁使用铜宫内节育器的性活跃女性的基线调查和研究图表。宫内节育器由参与试验的医生、护士和助产士以及当地的非研究提供者植入。卡方检验和Fisher精确检验被用来比较不同提供者类型的妇女的不良事件经历,如不规则出血、盆腔疼痛或器械排出。结果:一半(54%)的女性报告经历过不良事件;最常见的是不规则出血和盆腔疼痛(分别为45%和25%)。与从研究医生或研究护士处接受宫内节育器的妇女相比,从非研究提供者处接受宫内节育器的妇女报告任何不良事件的比例更大(分别为76%对49%和51%),不规则出血(57%对41%和45%)和盆腔疼痛(35%对15%和32%);研究医生和护士之间的差异仅在盆腔疼痛方面具有显著性。研究护士和非研究提供者的开除率相当(分别为12.3和11.9 / 100女性年),但研究医生的开除率较低(7.3 / 100女性年)。结论:研究结果支持将宫内节育器插入任务转移到中级提供者,以改善撒哈拉以南非洲地区宫内节育器的获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and Safety of IUD Insertion by Mid-Level Providers in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Context: The copper IUD is safe and effective, but underutilized in Sub-Saharan Africa, in part because of a lack of trained providers. The World Health Organization recommends training mid-level providers-including nurses and midwives-to insert IUDs; however, the safety of such task shifting has not been evaluated in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: Data were drawn from baseline surveys and study charts of 535 sexually active women aged 18-45 who used a copper IUD while participating in an HIV-prevention clinical trial conducted from August 2012 through June 2015 in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. IUDs were inserted by study physicians, nurses and midwives trained as part of the trial, and by local nonstudy providers. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare women's experiences of adverse events-such as irregular bleeding, pelvic pain or device expulsion-by provider type.

Results: Half (54%) of women reported experiencing an adverse event; the most common were irregular bleeding and pelvic pain (45% and 25%, respectively). Compared with women who had received an IUD from a study physician or study nurse, greater proportions of women who had received one from a nonstudy provider reported any adverse event (76% vs. 49% and 51%, respectively), irregular bleeding (57% vs. 41% and 45%) and pelvic pain (35% vs. 15% and 32%); the difference between study physicians and nurses was significant only for pelvic pain. Expulsion rates were comparable for study nurses and nonstudy providers (12.3 and 11.9 per 100 woman-years, respectively), but lower for study physicians (7.3 per 100 woman-years).

Conclusions: The findings support task shifting of IUD insertion to mid-level providers to improve IUD access in Sub-Saharan Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信