句子语境引导语音回归到说话者的特质。

Alexandra Jesse
{"title":"句子语境引导语音回归到说话者的特质。","authors":"Alexandra Jesse","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speakers vary in their pronunciations of the sounds in their native language. Listeners use lexical knowledge to adjust their phonetic categories to speakers' idiosyncratic pronunciations. Lexical information can, however, be inconclusive or become available too late to guide this phonetic retuning. Sentence context is known to affect lexical processing, and listeners are typically more likely to categorize steps of a phonetic continuum in line with the semantic content of a sentence. In a series of experiments, we tested whether preceding sentence context can guide phonetic retuning. During a passive-listening exposure phase, English listeners heard a sound ambiguous between /s/ and /f/ spliced into the onset position of minimal word pairs (e.g., <i>sin</i> vs. <i>fin</i>). Sentence context disambiguated these minimal pairs as /s/-initial for 1 group of listeners and as /f/-initial for another group. At subsequent test, listeners categorized more steps on a /sa/-/fa/ continuum in line with their prior exposure; that is, when sentence context had disambiguated the ambiguous sound during exposure as /s/, listeners gave more /s/ responses than /f/ responses at test. These aftereffects occurred independently of whether contrastive phonemes from the respective other category were provided. No phonetic retuning was found when the disambiguating sentence contexts were replaced with neutral ones. Overall, these results provide evidence that sentence context can guide phonetic retuning, therefore expanding the usefulness of phonetic retuning as a tool for listeners to accommodate speakers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":504300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"184-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentence context guides phonetic retuning to speaker idiosyncrasies.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Jesse\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0000805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Speakers vary in their pronunciations of the sounds in their native language. Listeners use lexical knowledge to adjust their phonetic categories to speakers' idiosyncratic pronunciations. Lexical information can, however, be inconclusive or become available too late to guide this phonetic retuning. Sentence context is known to affect lexical processing, and listeners are typically more likely to categorize steps of a phonetic continuum in line with the semantic content of a sentence. In a series of experiments, we tested whether preceding sentence context can guide phonetic retuning. During a passive-listening exposure phase, English listeners heard a sound ambiguous between /s/ and /f/ spliced into the onset position of minimal word pairs (e.g., <i>sin</i> vs. <i>fin</i>). Sentence context disambiguated these minimal pairs as /s/-initial for 1 group of listeners and as /f/-initial for another group. At subsequent test, listeners categorized more steps on a /sa/-/fa/ continuum in line with their prior exposure; that is, when sentence context had disambiguated the ambiguous sound during exposure as /s/, listeners gave more /s/ responses than /f/ responses at test. These aftereffects occurred independently of whether contrastive phonemes from the respective other category were provided. No phonetic retuning was found when the disambiguating sentence contexts were replaced with neutral ones. Overall, these results provide evidence that sentence context can guide phonetic retuning, therefore expanding the usefulness of phonetic retuning as a tool for listeners to accommodate speakers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":504300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"184-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

说话者的母语发音各不相同。听者利用词汇知识来调整自己的语音类别,以适应说话者的特殊发音。然而,词汇信息可能是不确定的,或者太晚了,无法指导这种语音返回。众所周知,句子语境会影响词汇加工,听者通常更倾向于根据句子的语义内容对语音连续体的步骤进行分类。在一系列实验中,我们测试了前句语境是否能引导语音回归。在被动听力暴露阶段,英语听者听到了一个在/s/和/f/之间的模糊音,这个音被拼接到最小的单词对的起始位置(例如,sin和fin)。句子上下文消除了这些最小对的歧义,对一组听者为/s/-initial,对另一组听者为/f/-initial。在随后的测试中,听者在a/ sa/-/fa/连续体上分类的步骤与他们之前的接触一致;也就是说,当句子上下文在听/s/时消除了歧义音时,听者在测试中给出的/s/回应多于/f/回应。这些后效的发生与是否提供其他相应类别的对比音素无关。将消歧义的句子语境替换为中性语境时,没有发现语音回归。总的来说,这些结果提供了证据,句子上下文可以指导语音返回,因此扩大了语音返回作为听者适应说话者的工具的有用性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentence context guides phonetic retuning to speaker idiosyncrasies.

Speakers vary in their pronunciations of the sounds in their native language. Listeners use lexical knowledge to adjust their phonetic categories to speakers' idiosyncratic pronunciations. Lexical information can, however, be inconclusive or become available too late to guide this phonetic retuning. Sentence context is known to affect lexical processing, and listeners are typically more likely to categorize steps of a phonetic continuum in line with the semantic content of a sentence. In a series of experiments, we tested whether preceding sentence context can guide phonetic retuning. During a passive-listening exposure phase, English listeners heard a sound ambiguous between /s/ and /f/ spliced into the onset position of minimal word pairs (e.g., sin vs. fin). Sentence context disambiguated these minimal pairs as /s/-initial for 1 group of listeners and as /f/-initial for another group. At subsequent test, listeners categorized more steps on a /sa/-/fa/ continuum in line with their prior exposure; that is, when sentence context had disambiguated the ambiguous sound during exposure as /s/, listeners gave more /s/ responses than /f/ responses at test. These aftereffects occurred independently of whether contrastive phonemes from the respective other category were provided. No phonetic retuning was found when the disambiguating sentence contexts were replaced with neutral ones. Overall, these results provide evidence that sentence context can guide phonetic retuning, therefore expanding the usefulness of phonetic retuning as a tool for listeners to accommodate speakers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信