糖尿病和其他临床和社会人口学因素与指南一致的乳腺癌治疗的关系。

Heather T Gold, Huibo Shao, Ruth Oratz, Onchee Yu, Marilyn Hammer, Stephen Richardson, Denise Boudreau
{"title":"糖尿病和其他临床和社会人口学因素与指南一致的乳腺癌治疗的关系。","authors":"Heather T Gold,&nbsp;Huibo Shao,&nbsp;Ruth Oratz,&nbsp;Onchee Yu,&nbsp;Marilyn Hammer,&nbsp;Stephen Richardson,&nbsp;Denise Boudreau","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000000638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women with breast cancer have worse health outcomes with co-occurring type 2 diabetes, possibly due to suboptimal breast cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a cohort of women ages 66 to 85 y with stage I to III breast cancer from 1993 to 2012 from an integrated health care delivery system (n=1612) and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (n=98,915), linked to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data (total n=100,527). We evaluated associations between type 2 diabetes and other factors with undergoing guideline-concordant cancer treatment. We estimated χ tests for univariate analysis and relative risks (RRs) using multivariable log-binomial models for outcomes of (1) overall guideline-concordant treatment, (2) definitive surgical therapy (mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation), (3) chemotherapy if indicated, and (4) endocrine therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 60% of subjects with stage 1 tumors, one quarter below 70 years old, 23% had diabetes, 35% underwent overall guideline-concordant treatment, 24% chemotherapy, and 83% endocrine therapy. Women with diabetes were less likely to undergo overall guideline-concordant treatment (RR: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.98), and only slightly less likely to undergo guideline-concordant definitive surgical therapy (RR: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00). No differences were found for chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. Other factors significantly associated with a lower risk of guideline-concordant care were cancer stages II to III (vs. I; RR=0.47-0.69, P<0.0001), older age (vs. 66 to 69 y; RR=0.56-0.90, P<0.0001), higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid dual-eligibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diabetes was associated with lower adherence to overall guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment. However, higher stage, older age, higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid insurance were more strongly associated with lower use of guideline-concordant treatment. Given the heavy burden of breast cancer and diabetes, long-term outcomes analysis should consider guideline-concordant treatment.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Other factors besides diabetes are more strongly associated with guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":501816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"101-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000638","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Diabetes and Other Clinical and Sociodemographic Factors With Guideline-concordant Breast Cancer Treatment for Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Heather T Gold,&nbsp;Huibo Shao,&nbsp;Ruth Oratz,&nbsp;Onchee Yu,&nbsp;Marilyn Hammer,&nbsp;Stephen Richardson,&nbsp;Denise Boudreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COC.0000000000000638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women with breast cancer have worse health outcomes with co-occurring type 2 diabetes, possibly due to suboptimal breast cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a cohort of women ages 66 to 85 y with stage I to III breast cancer from 1993 to 2012 from an integrated health care delivery system (n=1612) and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (n=98,915), linked to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data (total n=100,527). We evaluated associations between type 2 diabetes and other factors with undergoing guideline-concordant cancer treatment. We estimated χ tests for univariate analysis and relative risks (RRs) using multivariable log-binomial models for outcomes of (1) overall guideline-concordant treatment, (2) definitive surgical therapy (mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation), (3) chemotherapy if indicated, and (4) endocrine therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 60% of subjects with stage 1 tumors, one quarter below 70 years old, 23% had diabetes, 35% underwent overall guideline-concordant treatment, 24% chemotherapy, and 83% endocrine therapy. Women with diabetes were less likely to undergo overall guideline-concordant treatment (RR: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.98), and only slightly less likely to undergo guideline-concordant definitive surgical therapy (RR: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00). No differences were found for chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. Other factors significantly associated with a lower risk of guideline-concordant care were cancer stages II to III (vs. I; RR=0.47-0.69, P<0.0001), older age (vs. 66 to 69 y; RR=0.56-0.90, P<0.0001), higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid dual-eligibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diabetes was associated with lower adherence to overall guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment. However, higher stage, older age, higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid insurance were more strongly associated with lower use of guideline-concordant treatment. Given the heavy burden of breast cancer and diabetes, long-term outcomes analysis should consider guideline-concordant treatment.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Other factors besides diabetes are more strongly associated with guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000638\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:乳腺癌女性合并2型糖尿病的健康结果较差,可能是由于乳腺癌治疗不理想所致。方法:我们从一个综合医疗保健提供系统(n=1612)和按服务收费的医疗保险受益人(n=98,915)中创建了一个1993年至2012年年龄66至85岁的I至III期乳腺癌妇女队列(n=1612),并与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据(总n=100,527)相关。我们评估了2型糖尿病和其他因素与接受指南一致的癌症治疗之间的关系。我们使用多变量对数二项模型估计了单因素分析和相对风险(rr)的χ检验结果:(1)总体指南一致治疗,(2)最终手术治疗(乳房切除术或乳房肿瘤切除术加放疗),(3)指征时化疗,(4)内分泌治疗。结果:我们的队列包括60%的1期肿瘤患者,1 / 4的患者年龄在70岁以下,23%的患者患有糖尿病,35%的患者接受了总体指南一致治疗,24%的患者接受了化疗,83%的患者接受了内分泌治疗。女性糖尿病患者接受总体指南一致性治疗的可能性较小(RR: 0.96;95%可信区间:0.94-0.98),接受符合指南的最终手术治疗的可能性略低(RR: 0.99;95%置信区间:0.99-1.00)。化疗和内分泌治疗没有发现差异。其他与指南一致性治疗风险较低显著相关的因素是癌症II至III期(vs. I;RR=0.47-0.69, p结论:糖尿病患者对总体指南一致性乳腺癌治疗的依从性较低。然而,较高的阶段,年龄较大,较高的合并症负担和医疗补助保险与较低的指南一致性治疗的使用更强相关。鉴于乳腺癌和糖尿病的沉重负担,长期结果分析应考虑指南一致性治疗。影响:除糖尿病外,其他因素与符合指南的乳腺癌治疗更密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Diabetes and Other Clinical and Sociodemographic Factors With Guideline-concordant Breast Cancer Treatment for Breast Cancer.

Background: Women with breast cancer have worse health outcomes with co-occurring type 2 diabetes, possibly due to suboptimal breast cancer treatment.

Methods: We created a cohort of women ages 66 to 85 y with stage I to III breast cancer from 1993 to 2012 from an integrated health care delivery system (n=1612) and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (n=98,915), linked to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data (total n=100,527). We evaluated associations between type 2 diabetes and other factors with undergoing guideline-concordant cancer treatment. We estimated χ tests for univariate analysis and relative risks (RRs) using multivariable log-binomial models for outcomes of (1) overall guideline-concordant treatment, (2) definitive surgical therapy (mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation), (3) chemotherapy if indicated, and (4) endocrine therapy.

Results: Our cohort included 60% of subjects with stage 1 tumors, one quarter below 70 years old, 23% had diabetes, 35% underwent overall guideline-concordant treatment, 24% chemotherapy, and 83% endocrine therapy. Women with diabetes were less likely to undergo overall guideline-concordant treatment (RR: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.98), and only slightly less likely to undergo guideline-concordant definitive surgical therapy (RR: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00). No differences were found for chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. Other factors significantly associated with a lower risk of guideline-concordant care were cancer stages II to III (vs. I; RR=0.47-0.69, P<0.0001), older age (vs. 66 to 69 y; RR=0.56-0.90, P<0.0001), higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid dual-eligibility.

Conclusions: Diabetes was associated with lower adherence to overall guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment. However, higher stage, older age, higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid insurance were more strongly associated with lower use of guideline-concordant treatment. Given the heavy burden of breast cancer and diabetes, long-term outcomes analysis should consider guideline-concordant treatment.

Impact: Other factors besides diabetes are more strongly associated with guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信