根据麻醉方法进行颈动脉内膜切除术的结果:全身麻醉与区域麻醉。

Q3 Medicine
Jong Won Kim, Up Huh, Seunghwan Song, Sang Min Sung, Jung Min Hong, Areum Cho
{"title":"根据麻醉方法进行颈动脉内膜切除术的结果:全身麻醉与区域麻醉。","authors":"Jong Won Kim,&nbsp;Up Huh,&nbsp;Seunghwan Song,&nbsp;Sang Min Sung,&nbsp;Jung Min Hong,&nbsp;Areum Cho","doi":"10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical strategies for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vary in terms of the anesthesia method, neurological monitoring, shunt usage, and closure technique, and no gold-standard procedure has been established yet. We aimed to analyze the feasibility and benefits of CEA under regional anesthesia (RA) and CEA under general anesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2012 and December 2017, 65 patients who had undergone CEA were enrolled, and their medical records were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. A total of 35 patients underwent CEA under RA with cervical plexus block, whereas 30 patients underwent CEA under GA. In the RA group, a carotid shunt was selectively used for patients who exhibited negative results on the awake test. In contrast, such a shunt was used for all patients in the GA group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no cases of postoperative stroke, cardiovascular events, or mortality. Nerve injuries were noted in 4 patients (3 in the RA group and 1 in the GA group), but they fully recovered prior to discharge. Operative time and clamp time were shorter in the RA group than in the GA group (119.29±27.71 min vs. 161.43±20.79 min, p<0.001; 30.57±6.80 min vs. 51.77±13.38 min, p<0.001, respectively). The hospital stay was shorter in the RA group than in the GA group (14.6±5.05 days vs. 18.97±8.92 days, p=0.022). None of the patients experienced a stroke or restenosis during the 27.23±20.3-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA with a reliable awake test reduces shunt use and decreases the clamp and operative times of CEA, eventually resulting in a reduced length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":38678,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"52 6","pages":"392-399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/93/kjtcv-52-392.PMC6901188.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Jong Won Kim,&nbsp;Up Huh,&nbsp;Seunghwan Song,&nbsp;Sang Min Sung,&nbsp;Jung Min Hong,&nbsp;Areum Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical strategies for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vary in terms of the anesthesia method, neurological monitoring, shunt usage, and closure technique, and no gold-standard procedure has been established yet. We aimed to analyze the feasibility and benefits of CEA under regional anesthesia (RA) and CEA under general anesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2012 and December 2017, 65 patients who had undergone CEA were enrolled, and their medical records were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. A total of 35 patients underwent CEA under RA with cervical plexus block, whereas 30 patients underwent CEA under GA. In the RA group, a carotid shunt was selectively used for patients who exhibited negative results on the awake test. In contrast, such a shunt was used for all patients in the GA group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no cases of postoperative stroke, cardiovascular events, or mortality. Nerve injuries were noted in 4 patients (3 in the RA group and 1 in the GA group), but they fully recovered prior to discharge. Operative time and clamp time were shorter in the RA group than in the GA group (119.29±27.71 min vs. 161.43±20.79 min, p<0.001; 30.57±6.80 min vs. 51.77±13.38 min, p<0.001, respectively). The hospital stay was shorter in the RA group than in the GA group (14.6±5.05 days vs. 18.97±8.92 days, p=0.022). None of the patients experienced a stroke or restenosis during the 27.23±20.3-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA with a reliable awake test reduces shunt use and decreases the clamp and operative times of CEA, eventually resulting in a reduced length of hospital stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"392-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/93/kjtcv-52-392.PMC6901188.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的手术策略在麻醉方法、神经监测、分流术的使用和闭合技术方面各不相同,目前尚未建立金标准程序。我们旨在分析区域麻醉(RA)下CEA和全身麻醉(GA)下CEA的可行性和效益。方法:选取2012年6月至2017年12月期间接受CEA治疗的65例患者,对其病历进行前瞻性收集和回顾性分析。RA伴颈丛阻滞下行CEA 35例,GA下行CEA 30例。在类风湿关节炎组中,对于清醒测试结果为阴性的患者,选择性地使用颈动脉分流术。相比之下,GA组的所有患者都使用了这种分流器。结果:术后无脑卒中、心血管事件或死亡病例。4例患者出现神经损伤(RA组3例,GA组1例),出院前均完全康复。RA组的手术时间和钳夹时间均短于GA组(119.29±27.71 min vs 161.43±20.79 min)。结论:RA采用可靠的清醒试验可减少分流器的使用,减少CEA钳夹和手术次数,最终减少住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.

Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.

Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.

Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.

Background: The surgical strategies for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vary in terms of the anesthesia method, neurological monitoring, shunt usage, and closure technique, and no gold-standard procedure has been established yet. We aimed to analyze the feasibility and benefits of CEA under regional anesthesia (RA) and CEA under general anesthesia (GA).

Methods: Between June 2012 and December 2017, 65 patients who had undergone CEA were enrolled, and their medical records were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. A total of 35 patients underwent CEA under RA with cervical plexus block, whereas 30 patients underwent CEA under GA. In the RA group, a carotid shunt was selectively used for patients who exhibited negative results on the awake test. In contrast, such a shunt was used for all patients in the GA group.

Results: There were no cases of postoperative stroke, cardiovascular events, or mortality. Nerve injuries were noted in 4 patients (3 in the RA group and 1 in the GA group), but they fully recovered prior to discharge. Operative time and clamp time were shorter in the RA group than in the GA group (119.29±27.71 min vs. 161.43±20.79 min, p<0.001; 30.57±6.80 min vs. 51.77±13.38 min, p<0.001, respectively). The hospital stay was shorter in the RA group than in the GA group (14.6±5.05 days vs. 18.97±8.92 days, p=0.022). None of the patients experienced a stroke or restenosis during the 27.23±20.3-month follow-up period.

Conclusion: RA with a reliable awake test reduces shunt use and decreases the clamp and operative times of CEA, eventually resulting in a reduced length of hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信