克服保健不平等:适合这项任务的参与性评价框架。

Markus Themessl-Huber, Anne Lazenbatt, Julie Taylor
{"title":"克服保健不平等:适合这项任务的参与性评价框架。","authors":"Markus Themessl-Huber,&nbsp;Anne Lazenbatt,&nbsp;Julie Taylor","doi":"10.1177/1466424008089798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Healthcare providers are confronted with the claim that the distribution of health and healthcare provision is inherently unfair. There is also a growing awareness that the tools and methodologies applied in tackling health inequalities require further development. Evaluations as well as interventions usually focus on population-based indicators, but do not always provide guidance for frontline service evaluation and delivery. That is why the evaluation framework presented here focuses on facilitating local service development, service provider and user involvement, and the adequate representation of different population groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A participative evaluation framework was constructed by drawing on six common success characteristics extrapolated from the published literature and policies on health inequalities. This framework was then applied to an intervention addressing women's psychosocial health needs in order to demonstrate its utility in practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework provides healthcare professionals with an evidence-based tool for evaluating projects or programmes targeting health inequalities in ways that are responsive to local contexts and stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This participative evaluation framework supports the identification of meaningful psychosocial and contextual indicators for assessing the diverse health and social needs of service users. It uses multi-dimensional indicators to assess health and social care needs, to inform local service development, and to facilitate the exchange of knowledge between researchers, service providers, and service users. The inherent responsiveness enables rigorous yet flexible action on local health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":22790,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","volume":"128 3","pages":"117-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1466424008089798","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming health inequalities: a participative evaluation framework fit for the task.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Themessl-Huber,&nbsp;Anne Lazenbatt,&nbsp;Julie Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1466424008089798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Healthcare providers are confronted with the claim that the distribution of health and healthcare provision is inherently unfair. There is also a growing awareness that the tools and methodologies applied in tackling health inequalities require further development. Evaluations as well as interventions usually focus on population-based indicators, but do not always provide guidance for frontline service evaluation and delivery. That is why the evaluation framework presented here focuses on facilitating local service development, service provider and user involvement, and the adequate representation of different population groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A participative evaluation framework was constructed by drawing on six common success characteristics extrapolated from the published literature and policies on health inequalities. This framework was then applied to an intervention addressing women's psychosocial health needs in order to demonstrate its utility in practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework provides healthcare professionals with an evidence-based tool for evaluating projects or programmes targeting health inequalities in ways that are responsive to local contexts and stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This participative evaluation framework supports the identification of meaningful psychosocial and contextual indicators for assessing the diverse health and social needs of service users. It uses multi-dimensional indicators to assess health and social care needs, to inform local service development, and to facilitate the exchange of knowledge between researchers, service providers, and service users. The inherent responsiveness enables rigorous yet flexible action on local health inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health\",\"volume\":\"128 3\",\"pages\":\"117-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1466424008089798\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424008089798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424008089798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:医疗保健提供者面临着健康和医疗保健提供的分配本质上是不公平的说法。人们还日益认识到,需要进一步发展用于解决保健不平等问题的工具和方法。评估和干预措施通常侧重于以人口为基础的指标,但并不总是为一线服务的评估和提供提供指导。因此,本文提出的评价框架侧重于促进地方服务发展、服务提供者和用户的参与以及不同人口群体的充分代表性。方法:通过从已发表的文献和健康不平等政策中推断出六个共同的成功特征,构建了一个参与式评估框架。然后将该框架应用于解决妇女心理社会健康需求的干预措施,以证明其在实践中的效用。结果:该框架为卫生保健专业人员提供了一个以证据为基础的工具,以适应当地情况和利益攸关方的方式评估针对卫生不平等问题的项目或规划。结论:这一参与性评价框架有助于确定有意义的社会心理和环境指标,以评估服务使用者的各种健康和社会需求。它使用多维指标来评估保健和社会护理需求,为地方服务发展提供信息,并促进研究人员、服务提供者和服务使用者之间的知识交流。固有的反应能力使我们能够对地方卫生不平等采取严格而灵活的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overcoming health inequalities: a participative evaluation framework fit for the task.

Aims: Healthcare providers are confronted with the claim that the distribution of health and healthcare provision is inherently unfair. There is also a growing awareness that the tools and methodologies applied in tackling health inequalities require further development. Evaluations as well as interventions usually focus on population-based indicators, but do not always provide guidance for frontline service evaluation and delivery. That is why the evaluation framework presented here focuses on facilitating local service development, service provider and user involvement, and the adequate representation of different population groups.

Methods: A participative evaluation framework was constructed by drawing on six common success characteristics extrapolated from the published literature and policies on health inequalities. This framework was then applied to an intervention addressing women's psychosocial health needs in order to demonstrate its utility in practice.

Results: The framework provides healthcare professionals with an evidence-based tool for evaluating projects or programmes targeting health inequalities in ways that are responsive to local contexts and stakeholders.

Conclusion: This participative evaluation framework supports the identification of meaningful psychosocial and contextual indicators for assessing the diverse health and social needs of service users. It uses multi-dimensional indicators to assess health and social care needs, to inform local service development, and to facilitate the exchange of knowledge between researchers, service providers, and service users. The inherent responsiveness enables rigorous yet flexible action on local health inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信