护理生活实验室对护理组织和工作生活质量的影响。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Anselm Yennef Vereycken, Leen De Kort, Geert Vanhootegem, Ezra Dessers
{"title":"护理生活实验室对护理组织和工作生活质量的影响。","authors":"Anselm Yennef Vereycken,&nbsp;Leen De Kort,&nbsp;Geert Vanhootegem,&nbsp;Ezra Dessers","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a growing interest in living labs (a research concept in which innovations are co-created with end-users and tested in practice) as a method to test and develop health and social care innovations. However, little is known about their effect on the care organization and care providers' quality of working life. By using the Flanders Care Living Labs program (Belgium) as a case study, the purpose of this paper is to explore how innovations in a living lab context may affect those issues.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This qualitative study combined data from document analysis, in-depth interviews and focus groups involving 23 care innovation projects. Deductive category application was used for analyzing data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Outcomes indicate that 22/23 care innovation projects resulted in organizational changes, and that 22 affected at least one care provider's quality of working life. Surprisingly, no project deliberately intended to affect the care organization and quality of working life. Future care innovation projects should focus on actual innovation and its implications for specific end-users, and on the broader organizational consequences and the possible effect on the care providers' work.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This is the first study that specifically focused on care innovation's effect on the care organization and on the quality of working life within a living labs context.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0069","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care living labs' effect on care organization and quality of working life.\",\"authors\":\"Anselm Yennef Vereycken,&nbsp;Leen De Kort,&nbsp;Geert Vanhootegem,&nbsp;Ezra Dessers\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a growing interest in living labs (a research concept in which innovations are co-created with end-users and tested in practice) as a method to test and develop health and social care innovations. However, little is known about their effect on the care organization and care providers' quality of working life. By using the Flanders Care Living Labs program (Belgium) as a case study, the purpose of this paper is to explore how innovations in a living lab context may affect those issues.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This qualitative study combined data from document analysis, in-depth interviews and focus groups involving 23 care innovation projects. Deductive category application was used for analyzing data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Outcomes indicate that 22/23 care innovation projects resulted in organizational changes, and that 22 affected at least one care provider's quality of working life. Surprisingly, no project deliberately intended to affect the care organization and quality of working life. Future care innovation projects should focus on actual innovation and its implications for specific end-users, and on the broader organizational consequences and the possible effect on the care providers' work.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This is the first study that specifically focused on care innovation's effect on the care organization and on the quality of working life within a living labs context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0069\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0069\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:人们对生活实验室(一种与最终用户共同创造创新并在实践中进行测试的研究概念)作为一种测试和开发卫生和社会保健创新的方法越来越感兴趣。然而,他们对护理组织和护理提供者的工作生活质量的影响知之甚少。通过使用法兰德斯护理生活实验室项目(比利时)作为案例研究,本文的目的是探索生活实验室环境中的创新如何影响这些问题。设计/方法/方法:本定性研究结合了文献分析、深度访谈和焦点小组的数据,涉及23个护理创新项目。采用演绎范畴法对数据进行分析。结果表明,22/23个护理创新项目导致了组织变革,并且22个项目至少影响了一个护理提供者的工作生活质量。令人惊讶的是,没有一个项目有意影响护理组织和工作生活的质量。未来的护理创新项目应该关注实际的创新及其对特定最终用户的影响,以及更广泛的组织后果和对护理提供者工作的可能影响。原创性/价值:这是第一个专门关注护理创新对护理组织和生活实验室环境下工作生活质量的影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Care living labs' effect on care organization and quality of working life.

Purpose: There is a growing interest in living labs (a research concept in which innovations are co-created with end-users and tested in practice) as a method to test and develop health and social care innovations. However, little is known about their effect on the care organization and care providers' quality of working life. By using the Flanders Care Living Labs program (Belgium) as a case study, the purpose of this paper is to explore how innovations in a living lab context may affect those issues.

Design/methodology/approach: This qualitative study combined data from document analysis, in-depth interviews and focus groups involving 23 care innovation projects. Deductive category application was used for analyzing data.

Findings: Outcomes indicate that 22/23 care innovation projects resulted in organizational changes, and that 22 affected at least one care provider's quality of working life. Surprisingly, no project deliberately intended to affect the care organization and quality of working life. Future care innovation projects should focus on actual innovation and its implications for specific end-users, and on the broader organizational consequences and the possible effect on the care providers' work.

Originality/value: This is the first study that specifically focused on care innovation's effect on the care organization and on the quality of working life within a living labs context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信