注射苄星青霉素G预防风湿性心脏病后的严重不良事件:心脏损害比过敏反应更容易发生。

Q2 Medicine
Heart Asia Pub Date : 2019-06-20 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2019-011191
Shannon Marantelli, Robert Hand, Jonathan Carapetis, Andrea Beaton, Rosemary Wyber
{"title":"注射苄星青霉素G预防风湿性心脏病后的严重不良事件:心脏损害比过敏反应更容易发生。","authors":"Shannon Marantelli,&nbsp;Robert Hand,&nbsp;Jonathan Carapetis,&nbsp;Andrea Beaton,&nbsp;Rosemary Wyber","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2019-011191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Secondary prophylaxis through long-term antibiotic administration is essential to prevent the progression of acute rheumatic fever to rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) has been shown to be the most efficacious antibiotic for this purpose; however, adverse events associated with BPG administration have been anecdotally reported. This study therefore aimed to collate case reports of adverse events associated with BPG administration for RHD prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A literature review was used to explore reported adverse reactions to BPG and inform development of a case report questionnaire. This questionnaire was circulated through professional networks to solicit retrospective reports of adverse events from treating physicians. Returned surveys were tabulated and thematically analysed. Reactions were assessed using the Brighton Collaboration case definition to identity potential anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained 10 case reports from various locations, with patients ranging in age from early-teens to adults. All patients had clinical or echocardiogram-obtained evidence of valvular disease. The majority of patients (80%) had received BPG prior to the event with no previous adverse reaction. In eight cases, the reaction was fatal; in one case resuscitation was successful and in one case treatment was not required. Only three cases met Level 1 Brighton criteria consistent with anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that anaphylaxis is not a major cause of adverse reactions to BPG. An alternative mechanism for sudden death following BPG administration in people with severe RHD is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":" ","pages":"e011191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011191","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severe adverse events following benzathine penicillin G injection for rheumatic heart disease prophylaxis: cardiac compromise more likely than anaphylaxis.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Marantelli,&nbsp;Robert Hand,&nbsp;Jonathan Carapetis,&nbsp;Andrea Beaton,&nbsp;Rosemary Wyber\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartasia-2019-011191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Secondary prophylaxis through long-term antibiotic administration is essential to prevent the progression of acute rheumatic fever to rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) has been shown to be the most efficacious antibiotic for this purpose; however, adverse events associated with BPG administration have been anecdotally reported. This study therefore aimed to collate case reports of adverse events associated with BPG administration for RHD prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A literature review was used to explore reported adverse reactions to BPG and inform development of a case report questionnaire. This questionnaire was circulated through professional networks to solicit retrospective reports of adverse events from treating physicians. Returned surveys were tabulated and thematically analysed. Reactions were assessed using the Brighton Collaboration case definition to identity potential anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained 10 case reports from various locations, with patients ranging in age from early-teens to adults. All patients had clinical or echocardiogram-obtained evidence of valvular disease. The majority of patients (80%) had received BPG prior to the event with no previous adverse reaction. In eight cases, the reaction was fatal; in one case resuscitation was successful and in one case treatment was not required. Only three cases met Level 1 Brighton criteria consistent with anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that anaphylaxis is not a major cause of adverse reactions to BPG. An alternative mechanism for sudden death following BPG administration in people with severe RHD is proposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Asia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011191\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的:二级预防通过长期抗生素给药是必不可少的,以防止急性风湿热发展为风湿性心脏病(RHD)。苄星青霉素G (BPG)已被证明是最有效的抗生素;然而,与BPG给药相关的不良事件有轶事报道。因此,本研究旨在整理与BPG预防RHD相关的不良事件的病例报告。研究设计:通过文献回顾来探讨BPG的不良反应报告,并为病例报告问卷的编制提供信息。该问卷通过专业网络分发,以征求治疗医生对不良事件的回顾性报告。返回的调查结果被制成表格并按主题进行分析。使用布莱顿合作病例定义评估反应,以确定潜在的过敏反应。结果:我们获得了来自不同地区的10例病例报告,患者年龄从青少年早期到成人不等。所有患者均有临床或超声心动图证实有瓣膜疾病。大多数患者(80%)在事件发生前接受过BPG治疗,既往无不良反应。在8个病例中,反应是致命的;1例复苏成功,1例不需要治疗。只有3例符合与过敏反应一致的1级布莱顿标准。结论:这些结果表明过敏反应不是BPG不良反应的主要原因。提出了严重RHD患者服用BPG后猝死的另一种机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Severe adverse events following benzathine penicillin G injection for rheumatic heart disease prophylaxis: cardiac compromise more likely than anaphylaxis.

Objective: Secondary prophylaxis through long-term antibiotic administration is essential to prevent the progression of acute rheumatic fever to rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) has been shown to be the most efficacious antibiotic for this purpose; however, adverse events associated with BPG administration have been anecdotally reported. This study therefore aimed to collate case reports of adverse events associated with BPG administration for RHD prophylaxis.

Study design: A literature review was used to explore reported adverse reactions to BPG and inform development of a case report questionnaire. This questionnaire was circulated through professional networks to solicit retrospective reports of adverse events from treating physicians. Returned surveys were tabulated and thematically analysed. Reactions were assessed using the Brighton Collaboration case definition to identity potential anaphylaxis.

Results: We obtained 10 case reports from various locations, with patients ranging in age from early-teens to adults. All patients had clinical or echocardiogram-obtained evidence of valvular disease. The majority of patients (80%) had received BPG prior to the event with no previous adverse reaction. In eight cases, the reaction was fatal; in one case resuscitation was successful and in one case treatment was not required. Only three cases met Level 1 Brighton criteria consistent with anaphylaxis.

Conclusion: These results indicate that anaphylaxis is not a major cause of adverse reactions to BPG. An alternative mechanism for sudden death following BPG administration in people with severe RHD is proposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信