Arnold M Mahesan, Seifeldin Sadek, Hadi Ramadan, Silvina Bocca, Anthea B M Paul, Laurel Stadtmauer
{"title":"本科生和医学生对选择性卵母细胞冷冻保存的知识和态度。","authors":"Arnold M Mahesan, Seifeldin Sadek, Hadi Ramadan, Silvina Bocca, Anthea B M Paul, Laurel Stadtmauer","doi":"10.1186/s40738-019-0057-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess knowledge and attitudes regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation among female undergraduate students (UG) and medical students (MS) in Eastern Virginia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous cross-sectional study surveying female UG at a local university and MS at our academic medical center in May of 2017. The survey contained questions on demographic information, interest in fertility preservation, and knowledge about age related changes in fertility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 74 of 102 female UG and 95 of 117 female MS who responded, for a response rate of 73 and 81% respectively. UG were significantly younger than MS (21.4 vs 26.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Further, UG generally planned on conceiving at a younger age than MS (age 26-30 vs 31-35), and favored younger ages to consider oocyte cryopreservation (age 26-30 vs 31-35). Only a minority of both UG and MS were willing to undergo egg freezing at the current price of approximately $10,000 (15% vs 26% respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.044). Moreover, 73% of students overall responded that they would be more likely to freeze oocytes if their employer paid. Notably, both UG and MS underestimated age of fertility decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both UG and MS revealed a need for education on age-related changes in fertility. Most UG and MS would not undergo elective oocyte cryopreservation at the present cost but would consider it at a lower cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-019-0057-9","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and attitudes regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation in undergraduate and medical students.\",\"authors\":\"Arnold M Mahesan, Seifeldin Sadek, Hadi Ramadan, Silvina Bocca, Anthea B M Paul, Laurel Stadtmauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40738-019-0057-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess knowledge and attitudes regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation among female undergraduate students (UG) and medical students (MS) in Eastern Virginia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous cross-sectional study surveying female UG at a local university and MS at our academic medical center in May of 2017. The survey contained questions on demographic information, interest in fertility preservation, and knowledge about age related changes in fertility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 74 of 102 female UG and 95 of 117 female MS who responded, for a response rate of 73 and 81% respectively. UG were significantly younger than MS (21.4 vs 26.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Further, UG generally planned on conceiving at a younger age than MS (age 26-30 vs 31-35), and favored younger ages to consider oocyte cryopreservation (age 26-30 vs 31-35). Only a minority of both UG and MS were willing to undergo egg freezing at the current price of approximately $10,000 (15% vs 26% respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.044). Moreover, 73% of students overall responded that they would be more likely to freeze oocytes if their employer paid. Notably, both UG and MS underestimated age of fertility decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both UG and MS revealed a need for education on age-related changes in fertility. Most UG and MS would not undergo elective oocyte cryopreservation at the present cost but would consider it at a lower cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-019-0057-9\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-019-0057-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-019-0057-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
背景:了解东维吉尼亚州女本科生(UG)和女医学生(MS)对选择性卵母细胞冷冻保存的知识和态度。方法:采用匿名横断面研究,于2017年5月对当地某高校女性UG和我院学术医学中心MS进行调查。调查的问题包括人口统计信息、对保持生育能力的兴趣以及对与年龄有关的生育率变化的了解。结果:102例女性UG应答74例,117例女性MS应答95例,应答率分别为73%和81%。UG组明显比MS组年轻(21.4 vs 26.8, p p = 0.044)。此外,73%的学生表示,如果雇主付钱,他们更有可能冷冻卵母细胞。值得注意的是,UG和MS都低估了生育率下降的年龄。结论:UG和MS都表明需要对生育能力的年龄相关变化进行教育。大多数UG和MS在目前的成本下不会进行选择性卵母细胞冷冻保存,但会考虑较低的成本。
Knowledge and attitudes regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation in undergraduate and medical students.
Background: To assess knowledge and attitudes regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation among female undergraduate students (UG) and medical students (MS) in Eastern Virginia.
Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional study surveying female UG at a local university and MS at our academic medical center in May of 2017. The survey contained questions on demographic information, interest in fertility preservation, and knowledge about age related changes in fertility.
Results: There were 74 of 102 female UG and 95 of 117 female MS who responded, for a response rate of 73 and 81% respectively. UG were significantly younger than MS (21.4 vs 26.8, p < 0.001). Further, UG generally planned on conceiving at a younger age than MS (age 26-30 vs 31-35), and favored younger ages to consider oocyte cryopreservation (age 26-30 vs 31-35). Only a minority of both UG and MS were willing to undergo egg freezing at the current price of approximately $10,000 (15% vs 26% respectively, p = 0.044). Moreover, 73% of students overall responded that they would be more likely to freeze oocytes if their employer paid. Notably, both UG and MS underestimated age of fertility decline.
Conclusion: Both UG and MS revealed a need for education on age-related changes in fertility. Most UG and MS would not undergo elective oocyte cryopreservation at the present cost but would consider it at a lower cost.