块茎摄入量的生物标志物。

Xiaomin Zhou, Qian Gao, Giulia Praticò, Jie Chen, Lars Ove Dragsted
{"title":"块茎摄入量的生物标志物。","authors":"Xiaomin Zhou,&nbsp;Qian Gao,&nbsp;Giulia Praticò,&nbsp;Jie Chen,&nbsp;Lars Ove Dragsted","doi":"10.1186/s12263-019-0631-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tubers are important crops as well as staple foods in human nutrition. Among tubers, the potato in particular has been investigated for its health effects. However, except for its contribution to energy and effects related to resistant starch, the role of potatoes and other tubers in human health is still debated. In order to establish firm evidence for the health effects of dietary tubers and processed tuber products, it is essential to assess total intake accurately. The dietary assessment in most studies relies mainly on self-reporting and may give imprecise quantitative information on dietary intakes. Biomarkers of food intake (BFIs) are useful objective means to assess intake of specific foods or may be used as an additional measure to calibrate the measurement error in dietary reports. Here, intake biomarkers for common tubers, including potatoes and heated potato products, sweet potato, cassava, yam, and Jerusalem artichoke, are reviewed according to the biomarker of food intake reviews (BFIRev) standardized protocols for review and validation. Candidate BFIs for heated potato product include α-chaconine, α-solanine, and solanidine; less evidence is available to indicate peonidin 3-caffeoylsophoroside-5-glucoside and cyanidin 3-caffeoylsophoroside-5-glucoside as putative biomarkers having high potential specificity for purple sweet potato intake; linamarin may in addition be considered as a putative BFI for cassava. Other tubers also contain toxic glycosides or common contaminants as characteristic components but their putative use as intake biomarkers is not well documented. Alkyl pyrazines, acrylamide, and acrolein are formed during cooking of heated potato products while these have not yet been investigated for other tubers; these markers may not be specific only to heated potato but measurements of these compounds in blood or urine may be combined with more specific markers of the heated products, e.g., with glycoalkaloids to assess heated potato products consumption. Further studies are needed to assess the specificity, robustness, reliability, and analytical performance for the candidate tuber intake biomarkers identified in this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":12554,"journal":{"name":"Genes & Nutrition","volume":"14 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12263-019-0631-0","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomarkers of tuber intake.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomin Zhou,&nbsp;Qian Gao,&nbsp;Giulia Praticò,&nbsp;Jie Chen,&nbsp;Lars Ove Dragsted\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12263-019-0631-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tubers are important crops as well as staple foods in human nutrition. Among tubers, the potato in particular has been investigated for its health effects. However, except for its contribution to energy and effects related to resistant starch, the role of potatoes and other tubers in human health is still debated. In order to establish firm evidence for the health effects of dietary tubers and processed tuber products, it is essential to assess total intake accurately. The dietary assessment in most studies relies mainly on self-reporting and may give imprecise quantitative information on dietary intakes. Biomarkers of food intake (BFIs) are useful objective means to assess intake of specific foods or may be used as an additional measure to calibrate the measurement error in dietary reports. Here, intake biomarkers for common tubers, including potatoes and heated potato products, sweet potato, cassava, yam, and Jerusalem artichoke, are reviewed according to the biomarker of food intake reviews (BFIRev) standardized protocols for review and validation. Candidate BFIs for heated potato product include α-chaconine, α-solanine, and solanidine; less evidence is available to indicate peonidin 3-caffeoylsophoroside-5-glucoside and cyanidin 3-caffeoylsophoroside-5-glucoside as putative biomarkers having high potential specificity for purple sweet potato intake; linamarin may in addition be considered as a putative BFI for cassava. Other tubers also contain toxic glycosides or common contaminants as characteristic components but their putative use as intake biomarkers is not well documented. Alkyl pyrazines, acrylamide, and acrolein are formed during cooking of heated potato products while these have not yet been investigated for other tubers; these markers may not be specific only to heated potato but measurements of these compounds in blood or urine may be combined with more specific markers of the heated products, e.g., with glycoalkaloids to assess heated potato products consumption. Further studies are needed to assess the specificity, robustness, reliability, and analytical performance for the candidate tuber intake biomarkers identified in this review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12263-019-0631-0\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0631-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12263-019-0631-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

块茎是重要的作物,也是人类营养的主食。在块茎中,尤其是马铃薯,人们对其健康影响进行了研究。然而,除了它对能量的贡献和与抗性淀粉有关的作用外,土豆和其他块茎在人类健康中的作用仍存在争议。为了建立膳食块茎和加工块茎产品对健康影响的确凿证据,准确评估总摄入量至关重要。大多数研究中的饮食评估主要依赖于自我报告,可能会提供关于饮食摄入量的不精确的定量信息。食物摄入量生物标志物(BFI)是评估特定食物摄入量的有用客观手段,也可作为校准饮食报告中测量误差的额外措施。在这里,根据食品摄入生物标志物审查(BFIRev)标准化审查和验证方案,对常见块茎的摄入生物标记物进行了审查,包括土豆和加热土豆制品、红薯、木薯、山药和菊芋。加热马铃薯产品的候选BFI包括α-茶锥菌碱、α-茄碱和茄烷;较少的证据表明牡丹苷3-咖啡酰槐苷-5-葡萄糖苷和矢车菊素3-咖啡酰苦参苷-5-葡萄苷是对紫甘薯摄入具有高潜在特异性的假定生物标志物;此外,linamarin可以被认为是木薯的假定BFI。其他块茎也含有有毒糖苷或常见污染物作为特征成分,但它们作为摄入生物标志物的假定用途没有得到充分的证明。烷基吡嗪、丙烯酰胺和丙烯醛是在加热土豆制品的烹饪过程中形成的,而这些尚未对其他块茎进行研究;这些标记物可能不仅对加热的土豆具有特异性,而且血液或尿液中这些化合物的测量可以与加热的产品的更具特异性的标记物相结合,例如与配糖生物碱相结合,以评估加热的土豆产品的消耗量。需要进一步的研究来评估本综述中确定的候选块茎摄入生物标志物的特异性、稳健性、可靠性和分析性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomarkers of tuber intake.

Biomarkers of tuber intake.

Biomarkers of tuber intake.

Tubers are important crops as well as staple foods in human nutrition. Among tubers, the potato in particular has been investigated for its health effects. However, except for its contribution to energy and effects related to resistant starch, the role of potatoes and other tubers in human health is still debated. In order to establish firm evidence for the health effects of dietary tubers and processed tuber products, it is essential to assess total intake accurately. The dietary assessment in most studies relies mainly on self-reporting and may give imprecise quantitative information on dietary intakes. Biomarkers of food intake (BFIs) are useful objective means to assess intake of specific foods or may be used as an additional measure to calibrate the measurement error in dietary reports. Here, intake biomarkers for common tubers, including potatoes and heated potato products, sweet potato, cassava, yam, and Jerusalem artichoke, are reviewed according to the biomarker of food intake reviews (BFIRev) standardized protocols for review and validation. Candidate BFIs for heated potato product include α-chaconine, α-solanine, and solanidine; less evidence is available to indicate peonidin 3-caffeoylsophoroside-5-glucoside and cyanidin 3-caffeoylsophoroside-5-glucoside as putative biomarkers having high potential specificity for purple sweet potato intake; linamarin may in addition be considered as a putative BFI for cassava. Other tubers also contain toxic glycosides or common contaminants as characteristic components but their putative use as intake biomarkers is not well documented. Alkyl pyrazines, acrylamide, and acrolein are formed during cooking of heated potato products while these have not yet been investigated for other tubers; these markers may not be specific only to heated potato but measurements of these compounds in blood or urine may be combined with more specific markers of the heated products, e.g., with glycoalkaloids to assess heated potato products consumption. Further studies are needed to assess the specificity, robustness, reliability, and analytical performance for the candidate tuber intake biomarkers identified in this review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信