Marina Cecelja, Amelia Moore, Ignac Fogelman, Michelle L Frost, Glen M Blake, Phil Chowienczyk
{"title":"使用PET/CT评估18F-NaF示踪剂摄取作为绝经后妇女主动脉钙化的预测指标:一项纵向研究","authors":"Marina Cecelja, Amelia Moore, Ignac Fogelman, Michelle L Frost, Glen M Blake, Phil Chowienczyk","doi":"10.1177/2048004019848870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography is associated with arterial stiffening and is an important predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Uptake of <sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride (<sup>18</sup>F-NaF) in the aortic wall reflects metabolically active areas of calcification. The aim of this study was to determine if <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in the aorta is associated with calcification and progression of calcification as detected by computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one postmenopausal women (mean age 62 ± 6 years) underwent assessment of aortic <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake using positron emission tomography/computer tomography at baseline and a repeat computed tomography scan after a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.3 years. Tracer uptake was quantified by calculating the target-to-background (TBR) ratios at baseline and follow-up. Calcification was assessed at baseline and follow-up using computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the follow-up period, aortic calcium volume increased from 0.46 ± 0.62 to 0.71 ± 0.93 cm<sup>3</sup> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, the change in calcium volume did not correlate with baseline TBR either unadjusted (<i>r</i> = 0.00, <i>P</i> = 1.00) or adjusted for age and baseline calcium volume (beta coefficient = -0.18, <i>P</i> = 0.42). TBR at baseline did not differ between participants with (<i>n</i> = 16) compared to those without (<i>n</i> = 5) progression in calcium volume (2.43 ± 0.46 vs. 2.31 ± 0.38, <i>P</i> = 0.58). In aortic segments identified to have the highest tracer uptake at baseline, calcium volume did not significantly change over the follow-up period (<i>P</i> = 0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a cohort of postmenopausal women, <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake as measured by TBR in the lumbar aorta did not predict progression of aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography over a four-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"8 ","pages":"2048004019848870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004019848870","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of aortic <sup>18</sup>F-NaF tracer uptake using PET/CT as a predictor of aortic calcification in postmenopausal women: A longitudinal study.\",\"authors\":\"Marina Cecelja, Amelia Moore, Ignac Fogelman, Michelle L Frost, Glen M Blake, Phil Chowienczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2048004019848870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography is associated with arterial stiffening and is an important predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Uptake of <sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride (<sup>18</sup>F-NaF) in the aortic wall reflects metabolically active areas of calcification. The aim of this study was to determine if <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in the aorta is associated with calcification and progression of calcification as detected by computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one postmenopausal women (mean age 62 ± 6 years) underwent assessment of aortic <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake using positron emission tomography/computer tomography at baseline and a repeat computed tomography scan after a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.3 years. Tracer uptake was quantified by calculating the target-to-background (TBR) ratios at baseline and follow-up. Calcification was assessed at baseline and follow-up using computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the follow-up period, aortic calcium volume increased from 0.46 ± 0.62 to 0.71 ± 0.93 cm<sup>3</sup> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, the change in calcium volume did not correlate with baseline TBR either unadjusted (<i>r</i> = 0.00, <i>P</i> = 1.00) or adjusted for age and baseline calcium volume (beta coefficient = -0.18, <i>P</i> = 0.42). TBR at baseline did not differ between participants with (<i>n</i> = 16) compared to those without (<i>n</i> = 5) progression in calcium volume (2.43 ± 0.46 vs. 2.31 ± 0.38, <i>P</i> = 0.58). In aortic segments identified to have the highest tracer uptake at baseline, calcium volume did not significantly change over the follow-up period (<i>P</i> = 0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a cohort of postmenopausal women, <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake as measured by TBR in the lumbar aorta did not predict progression of aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography over a four-year follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"2048004019848870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004019848870\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004019848870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004019848870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
计算机断层扫描检测到的主动脉钙化与动脉硬化有关,是心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的重要预测指标。主动脉壁18f -氟化钠(18F-NaF)的摄取反映了钙化代谢活跃区域。本研究的目的是确定主动脉18F-NaF摄取是否与计算机断层扫描检测到的钙化和钙化进展有关。方法:21名绝经后妇女(平均年龄62±6岁)在基线时使用正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描评估主动脉18F-NaF摄取,并在平均随访3.8±1.3年后进行重复计算机断层扫描。通过计算基线和随访时的目标-背景(TBR)比率来量化示踪剂摄取。在基线和随访时使用计算机断层扫描评估钙化情况。结果:在随访期间,主动脉钙容量从0.46±0.62 cm3增加到0.71±0.93 cm3 (P r = 0.00, P = 1.00)或根据年龄和基线钙容量调整(β系数= -0.18,P = 0.42)。基线TBR在钙容量进展(n = 16)与未进展(n = 5)的参与者之间没有差异(2.43±0.46 vs. 2.31±0.38,P = 0.58)。在基线时示踪剂摄取最高的主动脉段,钙容量在随访期间没有显著变化(P = 0.41)。结论:在绝经后妇女队列中,腰主动脉TBR测量的18F-NaF摄取不能预测四年随访期间计算机断层扫描检测到的主动脉钙化进展。
Evaluation of aortic 18F-NaF tracer uptake using PET/CT as a predictor of aortic calcification in postmenopausal women: A longitudinal study.
Introduction: Aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography is associated with arterial stiffening and is an important predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Uptake of 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) in the aortic wall reflects metabolically active areas of calcification. The aim of this study was to determine if 18F-NaF uptake in the aorta is associated with calcification and progression of calcification as detected by computed tomography.
Methods: Twenty-one postmenopausal women (mean age 62 ± 6 years) underwent assessment of aortic 18F-NaF uptake using positron emission tomography/computer tomography at baseline and a repeat computed tomography scan after a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.3 years. Tracer uptake was quantified by calculating the target-to-background (TBR) ratios at baseline and follow-up. Calcification was assessed at baseline and follow-up using computed tomography.
Results: Over the follow-up period, aortic calcium volume increased from 0.46 ± 0.62 to 0.71 ± 0.93 cm3 (P < 0.05). However, the change in calcium volume did not correlate with baseline TBR either unadjusted (r = 0.00, P = 1.00) or adjusted for age and baseline calcium volume (beta coefficient = -0.18, P = 0.42). TBR at baseline did not differ between participants with (n = 16) compared to those without (n = 5) progression in calcium volume (2.43 ± 0.46 vs. 2.31 ± 0.38, P = 0.58). In aortic segments identified to have the highest tracer uptake at baseline, calcium volume did not significantly change over the follow-up period (P = 0.41).
Conclusion: In a cohort of postmenopausal women, 18F-NaF uptake as measured by TBR in the lumbar aorta did not predict progression of aortic calcification as detected by computed tomography over a four-year follow-up.