头颈癌手术中的静脉血栓栓塞。

Cancers of the head & neck Pub Date : 2016-11-01 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s41199-016-0014-9
Faisal I Ahmad, Daniel R Clayburgh
{"title":"头颈癌手术中的静脉血栓栓塞。","authors":"Faisal I Ahmad,&nbsp;Daniel R Clayburgh","doi":"10.1186/s41199-016-0014-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Historically, otolaryngology surgery has been seen as very low risk of VTE, given the relatively short procedures and healthy patient population. However, head and neck surgery patients have multiple additional risk factors for VTE compared to general otolaryngology patients, and only recently has research been directed at examining this population of patients regarding VTE risk.</p><p><strong>Review: </strong>VTE has long been recognized as a major issue in other surgical specialties, with VTE rates of 15-60 % in some specialties in the absence of prophylaxis with either mechanical compression or anticoagulation. Multiple large-scale retrospective studies have shown that the incidence of VTE in otolaryngology patients is quite low, ranging between 0.1 and 1.6 %. However, these studies indicated that head and neck cancer patients may have an increased risk of VTE. Further retrospective studies focusing on head and neck cancer patients found a VTE rate of approximately 2 %, but one study also found a suspected VTE rate of 5.6 % based on clinical symptoms, indicating that retrospective studies may underreport the true incidence. A single prospective study found a 13 % risk of VTE after major head and neck surgery. Furthermore, risk stratification using the Caprini risk assessment model demonstrates that the highest risk patients may have a VTE risk of 18.3 %, although this may be lowered (but not eliminated) through the use of appropriate prophylactic anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VTE is likely a more significant concern in head and neck surgery patients than previously realized. Appropriate prophylaxis with mechanical compression and anticoagulation is essential; risk stratification may serve as a useful tool to identify head and neck cancer patients at highest risk for VTE.</p>","PeriodicalId":72518,"journal":{"name":"Cancers of the head & neck","volume":"1 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41199-016-0014-9","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venous thromboembolism in head and neck cancer surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Faisal I Ahmad,&nbsp;Daniel R Clayburgh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41199-016-0014-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Historically, otolaryngology surgery has been seen as very low risk of VTE, given the relatively short procedures and healthy patient population. However, head and neck surgery patients have multiple additional risk factors for VTE compared to general otolaryngology patients, and only recently has research been directed at examining this population of patients regarding VTE risk.</p><p><strong>Review: </strong>VTE has long been recognized as a major issue in other surgical specialties, with VTE rates of 15-60 % in some specialties in the absence of prophylaxis with either mechanical compression or anticoagulation. Multiple large-scale retrospective studies have shown that the incidence of VTE in otolaryngology patients is quite low, ranging between 0.1 and 1.6 %. However, these studies indicated that head and neck cancer patients may have an increased risk of VTE. Further retrospective studies focusing on head and neck cancer patients found a VTE rate of approximately 2 %, but one study also found a suspected VTE rate of 5.6 % based on clinical symptoms, indicating that retrospective studies may underreport the true incidence. A single prospective study found a 13 % risk of VTE after major head and neck surgery. Furthermore, risk stratification using the Caprini risk assessment model demonstrates that the highest risk patients may have a VTE risk of 18.3 %, although this may be lowered (but not eliminated) through the use of appropriate prophylactic anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VTE is likely a more significant concern in head and neck surgery patients than previously realized. Appropriate prophylaxis with mechanical compression and anticoagulation is essential; risk stratification may serve as a useful tool to identify head and neck cancer patients at highest risk for VTE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers of the head & neck\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41199-016-0014-9\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers of the head & neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41199-016-0014-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers of the head & neck","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41199-016-0014-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是围手术期发病率和死亡率的主要原因。从历史上看,耳鼻喉外科手术被认为是静脉血栓栓塞的风险非常低,因为手术时间相对较短,患者群体健康。然而,与普通耳鼻喉科患者相比,头颈部手术患者有许多额外的静脉血栓栓塞危险因素,直到最近才有研究针对这类患者进行静脉血栓栓塞风险的检查。回顾:静脉血栓栓塞长期以来一直被认为是其他外科专业的主要问题,在没有机械压迫或抗凝预防的情况下,一些专业的静脉血栓栓塞率为15- 60%。多项大规模回顾性研究表明,耳鼻喉科患者静脉血栓栓塞的发生率很低,在0.1% ~ 1.6%之间。然而,这些研究表明,头颈癌患者患静脉血栓栓塞的风险可能会增加。进一步针对头颈癌患者的回顾性研究发现静脉血栓栓塞率约为2%,但一项研究也发现基于临床症状的疑似静脉血栓栓塞率为5.6%,这表明回顾性研究可能低估了真实发生率。一项单一的前瞻性研究发现,重大头颈部手术后静脉血栓栓塞的风险为13%。此外,使用Caprini风险评估模型的风险分层显示,最高风险患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险可能为18.3%,尽管通过使用适当的预防性抗凝治疗可以降低(但不能消除)。结论:静脉血栓栓塞可能是头颈部手术患者比以前认识到的更重要的问题。适当的预防与机械压迫和抗凝是必不可少的;风险分层可以作为识别静脉血栓栓塞风险最高的头颈癌患者的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Venous thromboembolism in head and neck cancer surgery.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Historically, otolaryngology surgery has been seen as very low risk of VTE, given the relatively short procedures and healthy patient population. However, head and neck surgery patients have multiple additional risk factors for VTE compared to general otolaryngology patients, and only recently has research been directed at examining this population of patients regarding VTE risk.

Review: VTE has long been recognized as a major issue in other surgical specialties, with VTE rates of 15-60 % in some specialties in the absence of prophylaxis with either mechanical compression or anticoagulation. Multiple large-scale retrospective studies have shown that the incidence of VTE in otolaryngology patients is quite low, ranging between 0.1 and 1.6 %. However, these studies indicated that head and neck cancer patients may have an increased risk of VTE. Further retrospective studies focusing on head and neck cancer patients found a VTE rate of approximately 2 %, but one study also found a suspected VTE rate of 5.6 % based on clinical symptoms, indicating that retrospective studies may underreport the true incidence. A single prospective study found a 13 % risk of VTE after major head and neck surgery. Furthermore, risk stratification using the Caprini risk assessment model demonstrates that the highest risk patients may have a VTE risk of 18.3 %, although this may be lowered (but not eliminated) through the use of appropriate prophylactic anticoagulation.

Conclusion: VTE is likely a more significant concern in head and neck surgery patients than previously realized. Appropriate prophylaxis with mechanical compression and anticoagulation is essential; risk stratification may serve as a useful tool to identify head and neck cancer patients at highest risk for VTE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信