降低高药价的繁荣:卫生与公众服务部的计划对一些玩家来说不是一个福音。

Q1 Medicine
P and T Pub Date : 2019-03-01
Stephen Barlas
{"title":"降低高药价的繁荣:卫生与公众服务部的计划对一些玩家来说不是一个福音。","authors":"Stephen Barlas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Trump administration's multipronged effort to use regulatory tools to lower drug prices includes old and new initiatives. But opposition from some players is evident in each instance. Some of that opposition may be based on sound reasoning, some of it may be based on self-interest. The author discusses advertising, protected-class drugs, what's next for rebates, and more.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"44 3","pages":"122-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385728/pdf/ptj4403122.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lowering the Boom on High Drug Prices: HHS Plans Not a Boon to Some Players.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Barlas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Trump administration's multipronged effort to use regulatory tools to lower drug prices includes old and new initiatives. But opposition from some players is evident in each instance. Some of that opposition may be based on sound reasoning, some of it may be based on self-interest. The author discusses advertising, protected-class drugs, what's next for rebates, and more.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"P and T\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"122-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6385728/pdf/ptj4403122.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"P and T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特朗普政府利用监管工具降低药品价格的多管齐下的努力包括新旧举措。但每次都有一些玩家反对。有些反对意见可能是基于合理的推理,有些可能是基于自身利益。作者讨论了广告、受保护的药品、回扣的下一步是什么等等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lowering the Boom on High Drug Prices: HHS Plans Not a Boon to Some Players.

Lowering the Boom on High Drug Prices: HHS Plans Not a Boon to Some Players.

The Trump administration's multipronged effort to use regulatory tools to lower drug prices includes old and new initiatives. But opposition from some players is evident in each instance. Some of that opposition may be based on sound reasoning, some of it may be based on self-interest. The author discusses advertising, protected-class drugs, what's next for rebates, and more.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信