脊椎按摩椎体半脱位第9部分:从1979年到1995年的复合体、模型和共识

Q3 Health Professions
Simon A. Senzon MA, DC
{"title":"脊椎按摩椎体半脱位第9部分:从1979年到1995年的复合体、模型和共识","authors":"Simon A. Senzon MA, DC","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2018.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss the history of chiropractic vertebral subluxation (CVS) between 1979 and 1995, with an emphasis on complexes, models, and consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>New models were developed and critiqued during this period. The first subluxation complex model was proposed by Faye. Other theorists such as Lantz and Dishman built upon his model. The complex models were integrated into consensus statements by the International Chiropractic Association and the American Chiropractic Association, and later by profession-wide processes. The plurality of the CVS encompassed known theories and included integration of stress models and biochemistry. The professional consensus around CVS was comprehensive as shown by the process models that included stakeholders in the profession. Calls for more empirical research and changes to terminology increased during this era. Influential articles from this period potentially contained errors and relied on older studies that may no longer be valid.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The challenges to researching this complex entity during that time were daunting for many and pointed to challenges of using the word “subluxation\" to encompass the multiplicity that defined CVS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 130-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2018.10.007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chiropractic Vertebral Subluxation Part 9: Complexes, Models, and Consensus From 1979 to 1995\",\"authors\":\"Simon A. Senzon MA, DC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echu.2018.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss the history of chiropractic vertebral subluxation (CVS) between 1979 and 1995, with an emphasis on complexes, models, and consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>New models were developed and critiqued during this period. The first subluxation complex model was proposed by Faye. Other theorists such as Lantz and Dishman built upon his model. The complex models were integrated into consensus statements by the International Chiropractic Association and the American Chiropractic Association, and later by profession-wide processes. The plurality of the CVS encompassed known theories and included integration of stress models and biochemistry. The professional consensus around CVS was comprehensive as shown by the process models that included stakeholders in the profession. Calls for more empirical research and changes to terminology increased during this era. Influential articles from this period potentially contained errors and relied on older studies that may no longer be valid.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The challenges to researching this complex entity during that time were daunting for many and pointed to challenges of using the word “subluxation\\\" to encompass the multiplicity that defined CVS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 130-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2018.10.007\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349918300172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349918300172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的回顾和讨论1979年至1995年间脊椎指压性椎体半脱位(CVS)的历史,重点介绍其复杂性、模型和共识。在此期间,新的模型被开发和批评。第一个半脱位复合体模型由Faye提出。其他理论家,如兰茨和迪什曼,都是建立在他的模型之上的。这些复杂的模型被国际脊椎指压协会和美国脊椎指压协会整合到共识声明中,后来被整个专业流程所采用。CVS的多元性包含了已知的理论,包括压力模型和生物化学的整合。如流程模型所示,专业人员对CVS的共识是全面的,流程模型包括了专业人员中的涉众。在这个时代,对更多实证研究和术语变化的呼吁增加了。这一时期有影响力的文章可能包含错误,并依赖于可能不再有效的旧研究。结论研究这一复杂实体的挑战对许多人来说是艰巨的,并指出了使用“半脱位”一词来包含定义CVS的多样性的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Chiropractic Vertebral Subluxation Part 9: Complexes, Models, and Consensus From 1979 to 1995

The Chiropractic Vertebral Subluxation Part 9: Complexes, Models, and Consensus From 1979 to 1995

The Chiropractic Vertebral Subluxation Part 9: Complexes, Models, and Consensus From 1979 to 1995

The Chiropractic Vertebral Subluxation Part 9: Complexes, Models, and Consensus From 1979 to 1995

Objective

The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss the history of chiropractic vertebral subluxation (CVS) between 1979 and 1995, with an emphasis on complexes, models, and consensus.

Discussion

New models were developed and critiqued during this period. The first subluxation complex model was proposed by Faye. Other theorists such as Lantz and Dishman built upon his model. The complex models were integrated into consensus statements by the International Chiropractic Association and the American Chiropractic Association, and later by profession-wide processes. The plurality of the CVS encompassed known theories and included integration of stress models and biochemistry. The professional consensus around CVS was comprehensive as shown by the process models that included stakeholders in the profession. Calls for more empirical research and changes to terminology increased during this era. Influential articles from this period potentially contained errors and relied on older studies that may no longer be valid.

Conclusion

The challenges to researching this complex entity during that time were daunting for many and pointed to challenges of using the word “subluxation" to encompass the multiplicity that defined CVS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信