不同印模技术制备氧化锆三单元固定局部义齿的配合评价

Q1 Medicine
Ghassan Moustapha, Khaled Azzam, Emad AlShwaimi, Munir Silwadi, Marco Ferrari, Ziad Salameh
{"title":"不同印模技术制备氧化锆三单元固定局部义齿的配合评价","authors":"Ghassan Moustapha,&nbsp;Khaled Azzam,&nbsp;Emad AlShwaimi,&nbsp;Munir Silwadi,&nbsp;Marco Ferrari,&nbsp;Ziad Salameh","doi":"10.1111/jicd.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconium fixed partial denture using different impression techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A Nissin Typodont model, including maxillary central incisor and canine with missing lateral incisor, was selected for the present study. Thirty zirconium frameworks were fabricated following three impression techniques (N = 10), conventional silicone impression (group C), scanned dental impression (group S), and Trios 3 (3Shape) intraoral scanner (group T). An extra-fine milling strategy was applied.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Group T had the smallest discrepancy compared to groups C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.006) and S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.052) at the marginal level, whereas it was larger at the incisal tip. Discrepancies in group T were smaller than group C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.004) when measured at the axial walls, and smaller than group S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.045) when measured at the chamfer area for the central teeth only. Samples in group T showed a greater percentage of equally extended restorations (52.5%), while other groups were mainly underextended (group C: 63.7%, group S: 68.8%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Better adaptation was achieved with the intraoral scanner group, except at the incisal tip. Conventional and scanned impressions revealed a greater percentage of underextended restorations<b>.</b></p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12413","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the fit of zirconia three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated by different impression techniques\",\"authors\":\"Ghassan Moustapha,&nbsp;Khaled Azzam,&nbsp;Emad AlShwaimi,&nbsp;Munir Silwadi,&nbsp;Marco Ferrari,&nbsp;Ziad Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jicd.12413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconium fixed partial denture using different impression techniques.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A Nissin Typodont model, including maxillary central incisor and canine with missing lateral incisor, was selected for the present study. Thirty zirconium frameworks were fabricated following three impression techniques (N = 10), conventional silicone impression (group C), scanned dental impression (group S), and Trios 3 (3Shape) intraoral scanner (group T). An extra-fine milling strategy was applied.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Group T had the smallest discrepancy compared to groups C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.006) and S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.052) at the marginal level, whereas it was larger at the incisal tip. Discrepancies in group T were smaller than group C (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.004) when measured at the axial walls, and smaller than group S (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.045) when measured at the chamfer area for the central teeth only. Samples in group T showed a greater percentage of equally extended restorations (52.5%), while other groups were mainly underextended (group C: 63.7%, group S: 68.8%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Better adaptation was achieved with the intraoral scanner group, except at the incisal tip. Conventional and scanned impressions revealed a greater percentage of underextended restorations<b>.</b></p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12413\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的评价不同印模技术下锆固定义齿的内、边缘贴合效果。方法选择包括上颌中切牙和缺失侧切牙的犬齿的Nissin型牙模型进行研究。采用三种印模技术(N = 10),常规硅胶印模(C组),扫描牙印模(S组)和Trios 3 (3Shape)口腔内扫描仪(T组)制作30个锆框架。采用超精细铣削策略。结果T组与C组(P = 0.006)、S组(P = 0.052)在边缘水平差异最小,而在切尖水平差异较大。当测量轴壁时,T组的差异小于C组(P = 0.004),当仅测量中牙的倒角区域时,T组的差异小于S组(P = 0.045)。T组样品中相同延伸的修复体比例较高(52.5%),而其他组主要是未延伸的修复体(C组:63.7%,S组:68.8%)。结论除切尖处外,口腔内扫描组具有较好的适应能力。常规和扫描的印象显示更大比例的延伸不足的修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the fit of zirconia three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated by different impression techniques

Aim

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconium fixed partial denture using different impression techniques.

Methods

A Nissin Typodont model, including maxillary central incisor and canine with missing lateral incisor, was selected for the present study. Thirty zirconium frameworks were fabricated following three impression techniques (N = 10), conventional silicone impression (group C), scanned dental impression (group S), and Trios 3 (3Shape) intraoral scanner (group T). An extra-fine milling strategy was applied.

Results

Group T had the smallest discrepancy compared to groups C (= 0.006) and S (= 0.052) at the marginal level, whereas it was larger at the incisal tip. Discrepancies in group T were smaller than group C (= 0.004) when measured at the axial walls, and smaller than group S (= 0.045) when measured at the chamfer area for the central teeth only. Samples in group T showed a greater percentage of equally extended restorations (52.5%), while other groups were mainly underextended (group C: 63.7%, group S: 68.8%).

Conclusion

Better adaptation was achieved with the intraoral scanner group, except at the incisal tip. Conventional and scanned impressions revealed a greater percentage of underextended restorations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry
Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry (JICD) aims to publish quality, peer reviewed original research and topical reviews on all aspects of investigative and clinical dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Although international in outlook, the Editor especially encourages papers from the Asia Pacific. The journal also aims to provide clinicians, scientists and students of dentistry with a knowledge transfer platform for rapid publication of reports through an international journal, which will be available free online until 2012. Its scope, therefore, is broad, inclusive and international, but with a particular focus on Asia Pacific. The Editor welcomes manuscripts in the following key thematic areas in oral and maxillofacial sciences: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Conservative Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials, Dental Pedagogy, Endodontics and Traumatology, Implant Dentistry, Oral Biosciences, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Orthodontics, Oral Radiology, Oral Rehabilitation, Paedodontics, Periodontology and Periodontal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信