观点:印度的精神卫生政策:七套问题和一些答案。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Arshad Mirza, Nirvikar Singh
{"title":"观点:印度的精神卫生政策:七套问题和一些答案。","authors":"Arshad Mirza,&nbsp;Nirvikar Singh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper frames the state of mental health policy in India in terms of seven sets of questions, and seeks to provide at least partial answers to these questions, based on a meta-analysis of existing research. The context of the analysis is the arguably poor state of mental health care in India, as well as an unprecedented level of policy attention to the issue.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>In brief, the questions we pose pertain to (i) the provision of such care in hospitals, (ii) non-hospital provision, including by non-medical providers, (iii) issues of education and social acceptance, (iv) affordability, (v) within-country variation of care and possibilities for benchmarking, (vi) aggregate resource impacts of a concerted effort to change policies and improve care, and (vii) the shape of a more effective \"continuum of care\" for mental health issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Given the complexity of the subject, this paper is meant to serve as a framing of issues for further research, but in doing so, to clarify what issues are most pressing, those that are most difficult and perhaps those that can be tackled more readily, to create some momentum in changing the relatively poor state of mental health care in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While new laws and policies being introduced in India propose ideas and changes that are groundbreaking for that country, leading to cautious optimism, there still are many gaps in the understanding of the challenges of the provision of increased access to, as well as better quality, mental health care in India. These challenges can be understood on two fronts: one is the psychiatric and medical aspect of the issues, and the other is the management and administration of the system.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Perhaps the highest priority in achieving the goals of greater access and better quality is to increase the number of trained personnel at all levels of specialization and skilling that are relevant. Further, while the new legal framework and policy identify the importance of information technology in rapid expansion of access to mental healthcare, more context-specific research and trials are needed. With respect to the administration and management needs of the public system, important challenges will be the need for significant organizational innovations in the education system, and cultural changes that allow specialized medical professionals to accept the use of software and less-qualified, more dispersed, frontline providers. A final area is the interface between the public and private sectors, including the role of non-profit organizations: challenges include information sharing, division of responsibilities, and resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care provision and use: </strong>Our analysis suggests that incorporating information technology, along with training professionals at a variety of skill levels in its use, may provide a resource-feasible approach to improving access to mental healthcare at reasonable cost and quality in the Indian context.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>India's mental health policies are already undergoing major changes, and our analysis emphasizes the need for translating these generic policies into specific and implementable versions that can be tested at the local level across different regional and social contexts in India.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>The overall challenge is daunting, being the need to expand access and improve quality, while still managing costs, all within an overall healthcare system that is itself struggling to achieve these goals. Further research based on piloting and trials of assistive software and training programs will likely be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"22 1","pages":"25-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERSPECTIVES: Mental Health Policy in India: Seven Sets of Questions and Some Answers.\",\"authors\":\"Arshad Mirza,&nbsp;Nirvikar Singh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper frames the state of mental health policy in India in terms of seven sets of questions, and seeks to provide at least partial answers to these questions, based on a meta-analysis of existing research. The context of the analysis is the arguably poor state of mental health care in India, as well as an unprecedented level of policy attention to the issue.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>In brief, the questions we pose pertain to (i) the provision of such care in hospitals, (ii) non-hospital provision, including by non-medical providers, (iii) issues of education and social acceptance, (iv) affordability, (v) within-country variation of care and possibilities for benchmarking, (vi) aggregate resource impacts of a concerted effort to change policies and improve care, and (vii) the shape of a more effective \\\"continuum of care\\\" for mental health issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Given the complexity of the subject, this paper is meant to serve as a framing of issues for further research, but in doing so, to clarify what issues are most pressing, those that are most difficult and perhaps those that can be tackled more readily, to create some momentum in changing the relatively poor state of mental health care in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While new laws and policies being introduced in India propose ideas and changes that are groundbreaking for that country, leading to cautious optimism, there still are many gaps in the understanding of the challenges of the provision of increased access to, as well as better quality, mental health care in India. These challenges can be understood on two fronts: one is the psychiatric and medical aspect of the issues, and the other is the management and administration of the system.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Perhaps the highest priority in achieving the goals of greater access and better quality is to increase the number of trained personnel at all levels of specialization and skilling that are relevant. Further, while the new legal framework and policy identify the importance of information technology in rapid expansion of access to mental healthcare, more context-specific research and trials are needed. With respect to the administration and management needs of the public system, important challenges will be the need for significant organizational innovations in the education system, and cultural changes that allow specialized medical professionals to accept the use of software and less-qualified, more dispersed, frontline providers. A final area is the interface between the public and private sectors, including the role of non-profit organizations: challenges include information sharing, division of responsibilities, and resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care provision and use: </strong>Our analysis suggests that incorporating information technology, along with training professionals at a variety of skill levels in its use, may provide a resource-feasible approach to improving access to mental healthcare at reasonable cost and quality in the Indian context.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>India's mental health policies are already undergoing major changes, and our analysis emphasizes the need for translating these generic policies into specific and implementable versions that can be tested at the local level across different regional and social contexts in India.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>The overall challenge is daunting, being the need to expand access and improve quality, while still managing costs, all within an overall healthcare system that is itself struggling to achieve these goals. Further research based on piloting and trials of assistive software and training programs will likely be useful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"25-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文框架的精神卫生政策的状态在印度方面的七组问题,并试图提供至少部分的答案,这些问题,基于现有研究的荟萃分析。分析的背景是印度可说是糟糕的精神卫生保健状况,以及对这一问题前所未有的政策关注。研究目的:简而言之,我们提出的问题涉及(i)在医院提供此类护理,(ii)非医院提供,包括由非医疗提供者提供,(iii)教育和社会接受问题,(iv)可负担性,(v)国内护理的差异和基准的可能性,(vi)共同努力改变政策和改善护理的总资源影响,以及(vii)形成更有效的心理健康问题“连续护理”。方法:鉴于这一主题的复杂性,本文旨在为进一步研究提供问题框架,但这样做是为了澄清哪些问题是最紧迫的,哪些问题是最困难的,也许哪些问题可以更容易地解决,从而为改变印度相对较差的精神卫生保健状况创造一些动力。结果:虽然印度出台的新法律和政策提出了对该国具有开创性的想法和变革,导致谨慎乐观,但在了解在印度提供更多机会和更好质量的精神保健方面所面临的挑战方面,仍然存在许多差距。这些挑战可以从两个方面来理解:一个是问题的精神病学和医学方面,另一个是系统的管理和行政。讨论:在实现更大的机会和更好的质量的目标方面,也许最优先的是增加相关的各级专业和技能方面受过训练的人员的数量。此外,虽然新的法律框架和政策确定了信息技术在迅速扩大获得精神保健服务方面的重要性,但还需要更多针对具体情况的研究和试验。就公共系统的行政和管理需求而言,重要的挑战将是需要在教育系统中进行重大的组织创新,以及文化变革,使专业医疗专业人员接受使用软件和不太合格、更分散的一线提供者。最后一个领域是公共和私营部门之间的接口,包括非营利组织的角色:挑战包括信息共享、责任分工和资源分配。对卫生保健提供和使用的影响:我们的分析表明,结合信息技术,以及对各种技能水平的专业人员进行培训,在印度的情况下,可能提供一种资源可行的方法,以合理的成本和质量改善获得精神卫生保健的机会。对卫生政策的影响:印度的精神卫生政策已经发生了重大变化,我们的分析强调需要将这些一般性政策转化为具体和可执行的版本,以便在印度不同区域和社会背景下在地方一级进行测试。对进一步研究的启示:总体的挑战是令人生畏的,需要扩大访问和提高质量,同时仍然管理成本,所有这些都在一个整体的医疗保健系统内,它本身正在努力实现这些目标。基于辅助软件和培训计划的试点和试验的进一步研究可能会有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERSPECTIVES: Mental Health Policy in India: Seven Sets of Questions and Some Answers.

Background: This paper frames the state of mental health policy in India in terms of seven sets of questions, and seeks to provide at least partial answers to these questions, based on a meta-analysis of existing research. The context of the analysis is the arguably poor state of mental health care in India, as well as an unprecedented level of policy attention to the issue.

Aims of the study: In brief, the questions we pose pertain to (i) the provision of such care in hospitals, (ii) non-hospital provision, including by non-medical providers, (iii) issues of education and social acceptance, (iv) affordability, (v) within-country variation of care and possibilities for benchmarking, (vi) aggregate resource impacts of a concerted effort to change policies and improve care, and (vii) the shape of a more effective "continuum of care" for mental health issues.

Methods: Given the complexity of the subject, this paper is meant to serve as a framing of issues for further research, but in doing so, to clarify what issues are most pressing, those that are most difficult and perhaps those that can be tackled more readily, to create some momentum in changing the relatively poor state of mental health care in India.

Results: While new laws and policies being introduced in India propose ideas and changes that are groundbreaking for that country, leading to cautious optimism, there still are many gaps in the understanding of the challenges of the provision of increased access to, as well as better quality, mental health care in India. These challenges can be understood on two fronts: one is the psychiatric and medical aspect of the issues, and the other is the management and administration of the system.

Discussion: Perhaps the highest priority in achieving the goals of greater access and better quality is to increase the number of trained personnel at all levels of specialization and skilling that are relevant. Further, while the new legal framework and policy identify the importance of information technology in rapid expansion of access to mental healthcare, more context-specific research and trials are needed. With respect to the administration and management needs of the public system, important challenges will be the need for significant organizational innovations in the education system, and cultural changes that allow specialized medical professionals to accept the use of software and less-qualified, more dispersed, frontline providers. A final area is the interface between the public and private sectors, including the role of non-profit organizations: challenges include information sharing, division of responsibilities, and resource allocation.

Implications for health care provision and use: Our analysis suggests that incorporating information technology, along with training professionals at a variety of skill levels in its use, may provide a resource-feasible approach to improving access to mental healthcare at reasonable cost and quality in the Indian context.

Implications for health policies: India's mental health policies are already undergoing major changes, and our analysis emphasizes the need for translating these generic policies into specific and implementable versions that can be tested at the local level across different regional and social contexts in India.

Implications for further research: The overall challenge is daunting, being the need to expand access and improve quality, while still managing costs, all within an overall healthcare system that is itself struggling to achieve these goals. Further research based on piloting and trials of assistive software and training programs will likely be useful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信