使用参考点压痕的骨组织力学行为的临床测量。

IF 0.8 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Andrew Chang, Garrett W Easson, Simon Y Tang
{"title":"使用参考点压痕的骨组织力学行为的临床测量。","authors":"Andrew Chang,&nbsp;Garrett W Easson,&nbsp;Simon Y Tang","doi":"10.1007/s12018-018-9249-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last thirty years, it has become increasingly clear the amount of bone (e.g. 'bone quantity') and the quality of the bone matrix (e.g. 'bone quality') both critically contribute to bone's tissue-level mechanical behavior and the subsequent ability of bone to resist fracture. Although determining the tissue-level mechanical behavior of bone through mechanical testing is relatively straightforward in the laboratory, the destructive nature of such testing is unfeasible in humans and in animal models requiring longitudinal observation. Therefore, surrogate measurements are necessary for quantifying tissue-level mechanical behavior for the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of bone strength and fracture risk <i>in vivo</i>. A specific implementation of indentation known as reference point indentation (RPI) enables the mechanical testing of bone tissue without the need to excise and prepare the bone surface. However, this compromises the ability to carefully control the specimen geometry that is required to define the bone tissue material properties. Yet the versatility of such measurements in clinical populations is provocative, and to date there are a number of promising studies that have utilized this tool to discern bone pathologies and to monitor the effects of therapeutics on bone quality. Concurrently, on-going efforts continue to investigate the aspects of bone material behavior measured by RPI, and the compositional factors that contribute to these measurements. There are currently two variants, cyclic- and impact- RPI, that have been utilized in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review surveys clinical studies that utilize RPI, with particular emphasis on the clinical instrument, as well as the endeavors to understand the fundamental mechanisms of such measurements. Ultimately, an improved awareness in the tradeoffs and limitations of <i>in vivo</i> RPI is critical towards the effective and successful utilization of this tool for the overall improvement of fragility determination in the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":45316,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":"16 3","pages":"87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12018-018-9249-9","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Chang,&nbsp;Garrett W Easson,&nbsp;Simon Y Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12018-018-9249-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the last thirty years, it has become increasingly clear the amount of bone (e.g. 'bone quantity') and the quality of the bone matrix (e.g. 'bone quality') both critically contribute to bone's tissue-level mechanical behavior and the subsequent ability of bone to resist fracture. Although determining the tissue-level mechanical behavior of bone through mechanical testing is relatively straightforward in the laboratory, the destructive nature of such testing is unfeasible in humans and in animal models requiring longitudinal observation. Therefore, surrogate measurements are necessary for quantifying tissue-level mechanical behavior for the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of bone strength and fracture risk <i>in vivo</i>. A specific implementation of indentation known as reference point indentation (RPI) enables the mechanical testing of bone tissue without the need to excise and prepare the bone surface. However, this compromises the ability to carefully control the specimen geometry that is required to define the bone tissue material properties. Yet the versatility of such measurements in clinical populations is provocative, and to date there are a number of promising studies that have utilized this tool to discern bone pathologies and to monitor the effects of therapeutics on bone quality. Concurrently, on-going efforts continue to investigate the aspects of bone material behavior measured by RPI, and the compositional factors that contribute to these measurements. There are currently two variants, cyclic- and impact- RPI, that have been utilized in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review surveys clinical studies that utilize RPI, with particular emphasis on the clinical instrument, as well as the endeavors to understand the fundamental mechanisms of such measurements. Ultimately, an improved awareness in the tradeoffs and limitations of <i>in vivo</i> RPI is critical towards the effective and successful utilization of this tool for the overall improvement of fragility determination in the clinic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"87-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12018-018-9249-9\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-018-9249-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-018-9249-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在过去的三十年里,人们越来越清楚地认识到骨头的数量(例如:“骨量”)和骨基质的质量(例如:“骨质量”)都对骨的组织水平力学行为和随后的骨抗骨折能力至关重要。尽管在实验室中通过力学测试来确定骨的组织水平力学行为相对简单,但这种测试的破坏性在需要纵向观察的人类和动物模型中是不可行的。因此,在临床前和临床评估体内骨强度和骨折风险时,有必要采用替代测量来量化组织水平的力学行为。被称为参考点压痕(RPI)的压痕的具体实现使骨组织的机械测试无需切除和准备骨表面。然而,这损害了仔细控制试样几何形状的能力,这是定义骨组织材料特性所必需的。然而,这种测量在临床人群中的多功能性是令人兴奋的,迄今为止,有许多有前途的研究利用这种工具来识别骨病理和监测治疗对骨质量的影响。同时,正在进行的努力继续研究RPI测量的骨材料行为的各个方面,以及促成这些测量的成分因素。目前有两种变体,循环RPI和冲击RPI,已用于临床前和临床研究。本文综述了利用RPI的临床研究,特别强调临床仪器,以及努力了解这种测量的基本机制。最终,提高对体内RPI的权衡和局限性的认识对于有效和成功地利用该工具来全面改善临床脆弱性测定至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation.

Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation.

Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation.

Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation.

Over the last thirty years, it has become increasingly clear the amount of bone (e.g. 'bone quantity') and the quality of the bone matrix (e.g. 'bone quality') both critically contribute to bone's tissue-level mechanical behavior and the subsequent ability of bone to resist fracture. Although determining the tissue-level mechanical behavior of bone through mechanical testing is relatively straightforward in the laboratory, the destructive nature of such testing is unfeasible in humans and in animal models requiring longitudinal observation. Therefore, surrogate measurements are necessary for quantifying tissue-level mechanical behavior for the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of bone strength and fracture risk in vivo. A specific implementation of indentation known as reference point indentation (RPI) enables the mechanical testing of bone tissue without the need to excise and prepare the bone surface. However, this compromises the ability to carefully control the specimen geometry that is required to define the bone tissue material properties. Yet the versatility of such measurements in clinical populations is provocative, and to date there are a number of promising studies that have utilized this tool to discern bone pathologies and to monitor the effects of therapeutics on bone quality. Concurrently, on-going efforts continue to investigate the aspects of bone material behavior measured by RPI, and the compositional factors that contribute to these measurements. There are currently two variants, cyclic- and impact- RPI, that have been utilized in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review surveys clinical studies that utilize RPI, with particular emphasis on the clinical instrument, as well as the endeavors to understand the fundamental mechanisms of such measurements. Ultimately, an improved awareness in the tradeoffs and limitations of in vivo RPI is critical towards the effective and successful utilization of this tool for the overall improvement of fragility determination in the clinic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism is an international review journal aimed at integrating new information from both basic and clinical science into the context of clinical practice in the wide field of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. Although one purpose of the journal is to deal with the well-known classical aspects of bone and mineral physiology, the journal’s unique character is to highlight information about the advancing field of molecular medicine, which now finds linkages between this classical field and disease states that in the past were considered distinct. For example, cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis share many biochemical pathways. New molecular tools show common pathways with bone physiology and obesity, diabetes mellitus, and energy metabolism. The focus on the novel is a major aspect of this journal’s purpose. The rapid developments in the field needs to be represented in a comprehensive way in order to keep students, clinicians and researchers up-to date. In order to assure that all latest developments are covered, the journal publishes, not only, unsolicited reviews, but also invited reviews on most important topics as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信