Eugenio Pedullà, Carlo Genovese, Riccardo Messina, Giusy R. M. La Rosa, Giacomo Corsentino, Silvia Rapisarda, Maria T. Arias-Moliz, Gianna Tempera, Simone Grandini
{"title":"无线超声或超声波装置对粪肠球菌感染根管的抗菌效果","authors":"Eugenio Pedullà, Carlo Genovese, Riccardo Messina, Giusy R. M. La Rosa, Giacomo Corsentino, Silvia Rapisarda, Maria T. Arias-Moliz, Gianna Tempera, Simone Grandini","doi":"10.1111/jicd.12434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immediate and residual antimicrobial activity of cordless sonic or ultrasonic devices on <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>E faecalis</i>)-infected teeth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 140 single-rooted extracted teeth with <i>E faecalis</i> were grouped as follows (N = 15): conventional syringe irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite activated by ultrasonic device (group 1) or cordless ultrasonic device (group 2), EndoActivator (group 3) or without activation (group 4), conventional syringe irrigation with sterile bi-distilled water and ultrasonic device (group 5), EndoUltra (group 6), EndoActivator (group 7), or without activation (group 8). The remaining 20 teeth were used for positive and negative controls. Colony-forming units (CFU) and turbidity were recorded from bacteriological samples taken before and after irrigation and after 24 hours of re-incubation. Data were statistically analyzed using Student's <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's multiple comparison tests (<i>P</i> < .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Groups 1 and 2 showed higher antimicrobial efficacy than groups 3 and 4 (<i>P</i> < .05). No bacteria reduction was found in groups 5-8 (<i>P</i> > .05). After 24 hours, regrowth of bacteria was not significantly different for all groups (<i>P</i> > .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Ultrasound produced lower CFU and turbidity after treatment and after re-incubation of 24 hours than sonic or no activation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12434","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial efficacy of cordless sonic or ultrasonic devices on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio Pedullà, Carlo Genovese, Riccardo Messina, Giusy R. M. La Rosa, Giacomo Corsentino, Silvia Rapisarda, Maria T. Arias-Moliz, Gianna Tempera, Simone Grandini\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jicd.12434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immediate and residual antimicrobial activity of cordless sonic or ultrasonic devices on <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>E faecalis</i>)-infected teeth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 140 single-rooted extracted teeth with <i>E faecalis</i> were grouped as follows (N = 15): conventional syringe irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite activated by ultrasonic device (group 1) or cordless ultrasonic device (group 2), EndoActivator (group 3) or without activation (group 4), conventional syringe irrigation with sterile bi-distilled water and ultrasonic device (group 5), EndoUltra (group 6), EndoActivator (group 7), or without activation (group 8). The remaining 20 teeth were used for positive and negative controls. Colony-forming units (CFU) and turbidity were recorded from bacteriological samples taken before and after irrigation and after 24 hours of re-incubation. Data were statistically analyzed using Student's <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's multiple comparison tests (<i>P</i> < .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Groups 1 and 2 showed higher antimicrobial efficacy than groups 3 and 4 (<i>P</i> < .05). No bacteria reduction was found in groups 5-8 (<i>P</i> > .05). After 24 hours, regrowth of bacteria was not significantly different for all groups (<i>P</i> > .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ultrasound produced lower CFU and turbidity after treatment and after re-incubation of 24 hours than sonic or no activation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12434\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antimicrobial efficacy of cordless sonic or ultrasonic devices on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals
Aim
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immediate and residual antimicrobial activity of cordless sonic or ultrasonic devices on Enterococcus faecalis (E faecalis)-infected teeth.
Methods
A total of 140 single-rooted extracted teeth with E faecalis were grouped as follows (N = 15): conventional syringe irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite activated by ultrasonic device (group 1) or cordless ultrasonic device (group 2), EndoActivator (group 3) or without activation (group 4), conventional syringe irrigation with sterile bi-distilled water and ultrasonic device (group 5), EndoUltra (group 6), EndoActivator (group 7), or without activation (group 8). The remaining 20 teeth were used for positive and negative controls. Colony-forming units (CFU) and turbidity were recorded from bacteriological samples taken before and after irrigation and after 24 hours of re-incubation. Data were statistically analyzed using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's multiple comparison tests (P < .05).
Results
Groups 1 and 2 showed higher antimicrobial efficacy than groups 3 and 4 (P < .05). No bacteria reduction was found in groups 5-8 (P > .05). After 24 hours, regrowth of bacteria was not significantly different for all groups (P > .05).
Conclusions
Ultrasound produced lower CFU and turbidity after treatment and after re-incubation of 24 hours than sonic or no activation.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry (JICD) aims to publish quality, peer reviewed original research and topical reviews on all aspects of investigative and clinical dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Although international in outlook, the Editor especially encourages papers from the Asia Pacific. The journal also aims to provide clinicians, scientists and students of dentistry with a knowledge transfer platform for rapid publication of reports through an international journal, which will be available free online until 2012. Its scope, therefore, is broad, inclusive and international, but with a particular focus on Asia Pacific. The Editor welcomes manuscripts in the following key thematic areas in oral and maxillofacial sciences: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Conservative Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials, Dental Pedagogy, Endodontics and Traumatology, Implant Dentistry, Oral Biosciences, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Orthodontics, Oral Radiology, Oral Rehabilitation, Paedodontics, Periodontology and Periodontal Medicine.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
