老年双柱髋臼骨折采用骨内固定与假体复合方案,有限元模型稳定性更好。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
András Kocsis, Károly Váradi, Gábor Szalai, Tamás Kovács, Tamás Bodzay
{"title":"老年双柱髋臼骨折采用骨内固定与假体复合方案,有限元模型稳定性更好。","authors":"András Kocsis,&nbsp;Károly Váradi,&nbsp;Gábor Szalai,&nbsp;Tamás Kovács,&nbsp;Tamás Bodzay","doi":"10.5606/ehc.2019.66592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare mechanical stability of osteosynthesis (plate and screw fixation) alone versus the same method supplemented with hip arthroplasty (hybrid solution) for double column fractures in elderly.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Mechanical investigations were performed on an advanced finite element pelvis model developed for double column fractures. The following simulated implant combinations were analyzed: modular acetabular basket with a ring with polyaxial screws and U-plate; plates with polyaxial screws placed on the medial-horizontal (linea terminalis) and quadrilateral bone surfaces; modular acetabular cup with U-plates; and polyaxial screws in sizes optimized based on a finite element model (FEM). Using the models, the possible shifts in peak load positions arising in different movement patterns caused by load and tension and implant deformation were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hybrid systems resulted in minimal deformation of the implants already available on the market. We observed less possible shifts and greater stability in the acetabular fracture zones, compared to conventional osteosynthesis alone. Optimization with available and compatible implant sizes led to a further significant increase in stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hybrid method combining osteosynthesis and prosthesis implantation provide more stability in biomechanical models in the treatment of double column fractures in elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":50551,"journal":{"name":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","volume":"30 2","pages":"106-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid solution combining osteosynthesis and endoprosthesis for double column acetabular fractures in the elderly provide more stability with finite element model.\",\"authors\":\"András Kocsis,&nbsp;Károly Váradi,&nbsp;Gábor Szalai,&nbsp;Tamás Kovács,&nbsp;Tamás Bodzay\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/ehc.2019.66592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare mechanical stability of osteosynthesis (plate and screw fixation) alone versus the same method supplemented with hip arthroplasty (hybrid solution) for double column fractures in elderly.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Mechanical investigations were performed on an advanced finite element pelvis model developed for double column fractures. The following simulated implant combinations were analyzed: modular acetabular basket with a ring with polyaxial screws and U-plate; plates with polyaxial screws placed on the medial-horizontal (linea terminalis) and quadrilateral bone surfaces; modular acetabular cup with U-plates; and polyaxial screws in sizes optimized based on a finite element model (FEM). Using the models, the possible shifts in peak load positions arising in different movement patterns caused by load and tension and implant deformation were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hybrid systems resulted in minimal deformation of the implants already available on the market. We observed less possible shifts and greater stability in the acetabular fracture zones, compared to conventional osteosynthesis alone. Optimization with available and compatible implant sizes led to a further significant increase in stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hybrid method combining osteosynthesis and prosthesis implantation provide more stability in biomechanical models in the treatment of double column fractures in elderly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"106-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.66592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.66592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较单独植骨(钢板和螺钉固定)与相同方法加髋关节置换术(混合溶液)治疗老年双柱骨折的机械稳定性。患者和方法:采用先进的有限元骨盆模型对双柱骨折进行力学研究。分析了以下模拟假体组合:模组化髋臼篮带多轴螺钉和u型钢板;在中水平骨(终线)和四边形骨表面放置带多轴螺钉的钢板;带u型钢板的组合式髋臼杯;以及基于有限元模型优化的多轴螺钉尺寸。利用该模型,测量了载荷、张力和植入物变形在不同运动模式下可能引起的峰值载荷位置变化。结果:混合系统使市场上已有的植入物变形最小。我们观察到髋臼骨折区移位的可能性更小,稳定性更强,与常规的骨融合术相比。优化可用的和兼容的种植体尺寸导致稳定性进一步显著增加。结论:骨固定与假体植入相结合的混合方法治疗老年双柱骨折的生物力学模型更稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid solution combining osteosynthesis and endoprosthesis for double column acetabular fractures in the elderly provide more stability with finite element model.

Objectives: This study aims to compare mechanical stability of osteosynthesis (plate and screw fixation) alone versus the same method supplemented with hip arthroplasty (hybrid solution) for double column fractures in elderly.

Patients and methods: Mechanical investigations were performed on an advanced finite element pelvis model developed for double column fractures. The following simulated implant combinations were analyzed: modular acetabular basket with a ring with polyaxial screws and U-plate; plates with polyaxial screws placed on the medial-horizontal (linea terminalis) and quadrilateral bone surfaces; modular acetabular cup with U-plates; and polyaxial screws in sizes optimized based on a finite element model (FEM). Using the models, the possible shifts in peak load positions arising in different movement patterns caused by load and tension and implant deformation were measured.

Results: Hybrid systems resulted in minimal deformation of the implants already available on the market. We observed less possible shifts and greater stability in the acetabular fracture zones, compared to conventional osteosynthesis alone. Optimization with available and compatible implant sizes led to a further significant increase in stability.

Conclusion: Hybrid method combining osteosynthesis and prosthesis implantation provide more stability in biomechanical models in the treatment of double column fractures in elderly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
43.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (formerly published as Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi) is the official publication of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is open access journal. The full text of the articles of the Journal is freely available without embargo since 1990. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is international, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of joint diseases and related surgey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信