脑卒中康复的分层:功能结果的五年概况。

Pub Date : 2018-12-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-14 DOI:10.1142/S1013702518500129
Bryan Ping Ho Chung
{"title":"脑卒中康复的分层:功能结果的五年概况。","authors":"Bryan Ping Ho Chung","doi":"10.1142/S1013702518500129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke rehabilitation in inpatient setting requires high intensity of manpower and resources. Early stratification of patients with stroke could facilitate early discharge plan and reduce avoidable length of stay (LOS) in hospital. Stratification of patients with stroke in clinical setting is usually based on functional scores which are quite time-consuming and require a special training to complete the full score.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to explore whether Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) can serve as a stratification tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation center. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited. The patients were divided into seven groups according to their admission MFAC. The between-group difference in LOS, functional outcomes at admission and discharge including Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) as well as MRMI gain, MRMI efficiency, MBI gain, and MBI efficiency were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 and 3 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MRMI gain (6.2 and 6.6, respectively) and subjects with admission categories of MFAC 3 to 5 had highly significant ( <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MRMI efficiency (0.34, 0.40, and 0.39, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 to 5 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MBI gain (9.7, 10.2, 9.3, and 7.0, respectively) and the subjects with admission categories of MFAC 4 to 5 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MBI efficiency (0.70 and 0.72, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and 2 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) LOS (27.7 and 26.6, respectively). MFAC profile was also established to represent the distribution of discharge MFAC of subjects according to their admission MFAC. The chance of subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and MFAC 2 progress to any kind of walker (MFAC <math><mo>></mo></math> 2) is 12.7% and 58.2%, respectively. The chance of subjects with admission MFAC 3, MFAC 4 and MFAC 5 progress to independent walker (MFAC <math><mo>></mo></math> 5) is 6.7%, 14.8%, and 50.3%, respectively. Both admission MFAC and admission MBI had strong correlations with discharge MFAC ( <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>84</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> and <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>78</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> , respectively), discharge MRMI ( <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>82</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> and <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>78</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> , respectively) and discharge MBI ( <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>78</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> and <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>94</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> , respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that patients on admission with moderate disability in term of MFAC had the greatest mobility gain and basic activities of daily living (ADL) gain from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Admission MFAC could be a stratification tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702518500129","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratification of stroke rehabilitation: Five-year profiles of functional outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Ping Ho Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S1013702518500129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke rehabilitation in inpatient setting requires high intensity of manpower and resources. Early stratification of patients with stroke could facilitate early discharge plan and reduce avoidable length of stay (LOS) in hospital. Stratification of patients with stroke in clinical setting is usually based on functional scores which are quite time-consuming and require a special training to complete the full score.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to explore whether Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) can serve as a stratification tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation center. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited. The patients were divided into seven groups according to their admission MFAC. The between-group difference in LOS, functional outcomes at admission and discharge including Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) as well as MRMI gain, MRMI efficiency, MBI gain, and MBI efficiency were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 and 3 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MRMI gain (6.2 and 6.6, respectively) and subjects with admission categories of MFAC 3 to 5 had highly significant ( <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MRMI efficiency (0.34, 0.40, and 0.39, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 to 5 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MBI gain (9.7, 10.2, 9.3, and 7.0, respectively) and the subjects with admission categories of MFAC 4 to 5 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) MBI efficiency (0.70 and 0.72, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and 2 had a highly significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) LOS (27.7 and 26.6, respectively). MFAC profile was also established to represent the distribution of discharge MFAC of subjects according to their admission MFAC. The chance of subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and MFAC 2 progress to any kind of walker (MFAC <math><mo>></mo></math> 2) is 12.7% and 58.2%, respectively. The chance of subjects with admission MFAC 3, MFAC 4 and MFAC 5 progress to independent walker (MFAC <math><mo>></mo></math> 5) is 6.7%, 14.8%, and 50.3%, respectively. Both admission MFAC and admission MBI had strong correlations with discharge MFAC ( <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>84</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> and <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>78</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> , respectively), discharge MRMI ( <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>82</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> and <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>78</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> , respectively) and discharge MBI ( <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>78</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> and <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>94</mn></math> , <math><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0001</mn></math> , respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that patients on admission with moderate disability in term of MFAC had the greatest mobility gain and basic activities of daily living (ADL) gain from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Admission MFAC could be a stratification tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702518500129\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702518500129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702518500129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:住院患者的脑卒中康复需要高强度的人力和资源。脑卒中患者的早期分层可以促进早期出院计划,并减少可避免的住院时间。在临床环境中,脑卒中患者的分层通常基于功能评分,这相当耗时,需要经过特殊训练才能完成满分。目的:本研究的目的是探讨改良功能性救护车类别(MFAC)是否可以作为卒中患者住院康复的分层工具。方法:这是一项对住院康复中心中风患者的人口统计学和功能结果的回顾性描述性研究。2011年至2015年,共招募了2722名完成中风康复计划的患者。根据入院MFAC将患者分为7组。分析了LOS、入院和出院时的功能结果(包括改良Rivermead活动指数(MRMI)和改良Barthel指数(MBI))以及MRMI增益、MRMI效率、MBI增益和MBI效率的组间差异。结果:入院类别为MFAC 2和3的受试者具有高度显著(p 0.001)的MRMI增益(分别为6.2和6.6),入院类别为MFC 3至5的受试对象具有高度显著的(p 001)MRMI效率(分别为0.34、0.40和0.39)。入院类别为MFAC 2至5的受试者具有高度显著(p 0.001)的MBI增益(分别为9.7、10.2、9.3和7.0),入院类别为MFAC 4至5的被试者具有非常显著(p 001)的MBI效率(分别为0.70和0.72)。入院类别为MFAC 1和2的受试者的LOS具有高度显著性(p 0.001)(分别为27.7和26.6)。还建立了MFAC档案,以表示受试者出院MFAC根据其入院MFAC的分布。入院类别为MFAC 1和MFAC 2的受试者进展为任何类型的助行器(MFAC>2)的几率分别为12.7%和58.2%。入院的MFAC 3、MFAC 4和MFAC 5的受试者发展为独立行走者(MFAC>5)的几率分别为6.7%、14.8%和50.3%。入院MFAC和入院MBI均与出院MFAC呈正相关(r分别为0.84,P0.0001和0.78,P0.0000),出院MRMI(r分别为0.82,P0.0001和r分别为0.78,P0.0000)和出院MBI(r分别是0.78,p0.0001和r=0.94,P0.001)。入院MFAC可能是住院康复中中风患者的分层工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stratification of stroke rehabilitation: Five-year profiles of functional outcomes.

Stratification of stroke rehabilitation: Five-year profiles of functional outcomes.

Stratification of stroke rehabilitation: Five-year profiles of functional outcomes.

分享
查看原文
Stratification of stroke rehabilitation: Five-year profiles of functional outcomes.

Background: Stroke rehabilitation in inpatient setting requires high intensity of manpower and resources. Early stratification of patients with stroke could facilitate early discharge plan and reduce avoidable length of stay (LOS) in hospital. Stratification of patients with stroke in clinical setting is usually based on functional scores which are quite time-consuming and require a special training to complete the full score.

Objective: The objective of the study was to explore whether Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) can serve as a stratification tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.

Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation center. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited. The patients were divided into seven groups according to their admission MFAC. The between-group difference in LOS, functional outcomes at admission and discharge including Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) as well as MRMI gain, MRMI efficiency, MBI gain, and MBI efficiency were analyzed.

Results: Subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 and 3 had a highly significant ( p < 0 . 001 ) MRMI gain (6.2 and 6.6, respectively) and subjects with admission categories of MFAC 3 to 5 had highly significant ( P < 0 . 001 ) MRMI efficiency (0.34, 0.40, and 0.39, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 to 5 had a highly significant ( p < 0 . 001 ) MBI gain (9.7, 10.2, 9.3, and 7.0, respectively) and the subjects with admission categories of MFAC 4 to 5 had a highly significant ( p < 0 . 001 ) MBI efficiency (0.70 and 0.72, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and 2 had a highly significant ( p < 0 . 001 ) LOS (27.7 and 26.6, respectively). MFAC profile was also established to represent the distribution of discharge MFAC of subjects according to their admission MFAC. The chance of subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and MFAC 2 progress to any kind of walker (MFAC > 2) is 12.7% and 58.2%, respectively. The chance of subjects with admission MFAC 3, MFAC 4 and MFAC 5 progress to independent walker (MFAC > 5) is 6.7%, 14.8%, and 50.3%, respectively. Both admission MFAC and admission MBI had strong correlations with discharge MFAC ( r = 0 . 84 , P < 0 . 0001 and r = 0 . 78 , P < 0 . 0001 , respectively), discharge MRMI ( r = 0 . 82 , P < 0 . 0001 and r = 0 . 78 , P < 0 . 0001 , respectively) and discharge MBI ( r = 0 . 78 , P < 0 . 0001 and r = 0 . 94 , P < 0 . 0001 , respectively).

Conclusion: This study showed that patients on admission with moderate disability in term of MFAC had the greatest mobility gain and basic activities of daily living (ADL) gain from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Admission MFAC could be a stratification tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信