Maren A McGurran, Lisa M Richter, Nathan D Leedahl, David D Leedahl
{"title":"综合COPD治疗交换方案对住院患者30天再入院率的影响","authors":"Maren A McGurran, Lisa M Richter, Nathan D Leedahl, David D Leedahl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. The economic effect of COPD management is substantial, and the prevalence of the disease continues to rise with the growth of older populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and financial impact of a comprehensive therapeutic interchange program (CTIP) in hospitalized patients with COPD. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate, with the following secondary outcomes: 30-day mortality and pharmacy-inhaled medication cost per patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a multi-center, retrospective, electronic chart review of patients with a diagnosis of COPD admitted to two hospitals from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. Our intervention group was admitted to a 550-bed tertiary care hospital and was managed with a pharmacist-led CTIP for inhaled products used in COPD. Our control group was admitted to a 545-bed tertiary care hospital, which did not have a CTIP in place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,885 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COPD were included in the analysis (1,350 in the intervention group and 1,535 in the control group). Univariable analysis demonstrated that the intervention group was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5.8% vs. 8.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.012) and a lower average pharmacy-inhaled medication cost ($221 vs. $311; <i>P</i> = < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the use of a pharmacist-led CTIP of COPD inhalers does not worsen patient outcomes and may provide pharmacy cost savings. The cohort managed with a CTIP was statistically associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate and lower pharmacy-inhaled medication costs without any difference in 30-day mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"44 4","pages":"185-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428498/pdf/ptj4404185.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Comprehensive COPD Therapeutic Interchange Program on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Hospitalized Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Maren A McGurran, Lisa M Richter, Nathan D Leedahl, David D Leedahl\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. The economic effect of COPD management is substantial, and the prevalence of the disease continues to rise with the growth of older populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and financial impact of a comprehensive therapeutic interchange program (CTIP) in hospitalized patients with COPD. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate, with the following secondary outcomes: 30-day mortality and pharmacy-inhaled medication cost per patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a multi-center, retrospective, electronic chart review of patients with a diagnosis of COPD admitted to two hospitals from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. Our intervention group was admitted to a 550-bed tertiary care hospital and was managed with a pharmacist-led CTIP for inhaled products used in COPD. Our control group was admitted to a 545-bed tertiary care hospital, which did not have a CTIP in place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,885 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COPD were included in the analysis (1,350 in the intervention group and 1,535 in the control group). Univariable analysis demonstrated that the intervention group was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5.8% vs. 8.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.012) and a lower average pharmacy-inhaled medication cost ($221 vs. $311; <i>P</i> = < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the use of a pharmacist-led CTIP of COPD inhalers does not worsen patient outcomes and may provide pharmacy cost savings. The cohort managed with a CTIP was statistically associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate and lower pharmacy-inhaled medication costs without any difference in 30-day mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"P and T\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"185-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428498/pdf/ptj4404185.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"P and T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是美国第三大死亡原因。慢性阻塞性肺病管理的经济效果是巨大的,随着老年人口的增长,该疾病的患病率继续上升。本研究的目的是评估综合治疗交换计划(CTIP)对住院COPD患者的临床和财务影响。主要终点是30天再入院率,次要终点是30天死亡率和每位患者的药物吸入费用。方法:本研究对2016年7月1日至2017年6月30日两家医院诊断为COPD的患者进行了多中心、回顾性、电子病历回顾。我们的干预组住进了一家拥有550张床位的三级医院,由药剂师领导的慢性阻塞性肺病吸入产品CTIP管理。我们的对照组被送往一家拥有545张床位的三级医院,该医院没有CTIP。结果:2885例诊断为COPD的住院患者被纳入分析(干预组1350例,对照组1535例)。单变量分析表明,干预组的30天再入院率较低(5.8% vs 8.3%;P = 0.012),平均吸入药物费用较低(221美元对311美元;P = < 0.01)。30天死亡率无统计学差异。结论:本研究表明,使用药剂师主导的慢性阻塞性肺病吸入器CTIP不会使患者预后恶化,并可能节省药费。使用CTIP管理的队列在统计学上与较低的30天再入院率和较低的药物吸入药物成本相关,但在30天死亡率方面没有任何差异。
Impact of a Comprehensive COPD Therapeutic Interchange Program on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Hospitalized Patients.
Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. The economic effect of COPD management is substantial, and the prevalence of the disease continues to rise with the growth of older populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and financial impact of a comprehensive therapeutic interchange program (CTIP) in hospitalized patients with COPD. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate, with the following secondary outcomes: 30-day mortality and pharmacy-inhaled medication cost per patient.
Methods: This study was a multi-center, retrospective, electronic chart review of patients with a diagnosis of COPD admitted to two hospitals from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. Our intervention group was admitted to a 550-bed tertiary care hospital and was managed with a pharmacist-led CTIP for inhaled products used in COPD. Our control group was admitted to a 545-bed tertiary care hospital, which did not have a CTIP in place.
Results: 2,885 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COPD were included in the analysis (1,350 in the intervention group and 1,535 in the control group). Univariable analysis demonstrated that the intervention group was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5.8% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.012) and a lower average pharmacy-inhaled medication cost ($221 vs. $311; P = < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the use of a pharmacist-led CTIP of COPD inhalers does not worsen patient outcomes and may provide pharmacy cost savings. The cohort managed with a CTIP was statistically associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate and lower pharmacy-inhaled medication costs without any difference in 30-day mortality.