{"title":"抗苗勒管激素是复发性流产患者活产的预测因子。","authors":"Gayathree Murugappan, Lora Shahine, Ruth B Lathi","doi":"10.1186/s40738-019-0054-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian reserve testing is not routinely performed in the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The objective of this study was to determine if AMH levels are predictive of live birth rate in RPL patients pursuing expectant management (EM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of RPL patients. Patients tried to conceive spontaneously for 12 calendar months or until they achieved a live birth, whichever occurred first. All patients with the intent to conceive were included regardless of final outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-five RPL patients treated from 2009 to 2017 were included. In a univariate logistic regression, AMH < 1 ng/mL was associated with decreased likelihood of live birth (OR 0.38; CI 0.16-0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and increasing age (OR 0.91; CI 0.83-0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Likelihood of live birth was not significantly associated with BMI (OR 1.21; CI 0.83-1.77, <i>p</i> = 0.31), three or four or more prior pregnancy losses (OR 0.93; CI 0.40-2.22, <i>p</i> = 0.87 and OR 0.52; CI 0.19-1.42, <i>p</i> = 0.20, respectively) and prior live births (OR 1.00; CI 0.48-2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.99). AMH < 1 ng/mL was shown to be a stronger predictor of live birth than age using a multivariate model adjusting for age, AMH, and time to conception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMH < 1 ng/mL is associated with decreased likelihood of live birth among RPL patients pursuing EM, and may be a stronger predictor of live birth than age in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-019-0054-z","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimullerian hormone is a predictor of live birth in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.\",\"authors\":\"Gayathree Murugappan, Lora Shahine, Ruth B Lathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40738-019-0054-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian reserve testing is not routinely performed in the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The objective of this study was to determine if AMH levels are predictive of live birth rate in RPL patients pursuing expectant management (EM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of RPL patients. Patients tried to conceive spontaneously for 12 calendar months or until they achieved a live birth, whichever occurred first. All patients with the intent to conceive were included regardless of final outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-five RPL patients treated from 2009 to 2017 were included. In a univariate logistic regression, AMH < 1 ng/mL was associated with decreased likelihood of live birth (OR 0.38; CI 0.16-0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and increasing age (OR 0.91; CI 0.83-0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Likelihood of live birth was not significantly associated with BMI (OR 1.21; CI 0.83-1.77, <i>p</i> = 0.31), three or four or more prior pregnancy losses (OR 0.93; CI 0.40-2.22, <i>p</i> = 0.87 and OR 0.52; CI 0.19-1.42, <i>p</i> = 0.20, respectively) and prior live births (OR 1.00; CI 0.48-2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.99). AMH < 1 ng/mL was shown to be a stronger predictor of live birth than age using a multivariate model adjusting for age, AMH, and time to conception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMH < 1 ng/mL is associated with decreased likelihood of live birth among RPL patients pursuing EM, and may be a stronger predictor of live birth than age in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-019-0054-z\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-019-0054-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-019-0054-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
背景:卵巢储备测试不是评估复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)的常规方法。本研究的目的是确定AMH水平是否可以预测采用预期治疗(EM)的RPL患者的活产率。方法:对RPL患者进行回顾性队列研究。患者尝试自然受孕12个月或直到他们实现活产,以先发生者为准。无论最终结果如何,所有有意怀孕的患者都被纳入研究。结果:2009年至2017年共纳入155例RPL患者。在单变量logistic回归中,AMH p = 0.03)和年龄增加(OR 0.91;CI 0.83-0.99, p = 0.04)。活产的可能性与BMI无显著相关(OR 1.21;CI 0.83-1.77, p = 0.31), 3次或4次或更多次流产(or 0.93;CI 0.40-2.22, p = 0.87, OR 0.52;CI分别为0.19-1.42,p = 0.20)和之前的活产(OR 1.00;CI 0.48-2.08, p = 0.99)。结论:AMH
Antimullerian hormone is a predictor of live birth in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Background: Ovarian reserve testing is not routinely performed in the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The objective of this study was to determine if AMH levels are predictive of live birth rate in RPL patients pursuing expectant management (EM).
Methods: Retrospective cohort study of RPL patients. Patients tried to conceive spontaneously for 12 calendar months or until they achieved a live birth, whichever occurred first. All patients with the intent to conceive were included regardless of final outcome.
Results: One hundred fifty-five RPL patients treated from 2009 to 2017 were included. In a univariate logistic regression, AMH < 1 ng/mL was associated with decreased likelihood of live birth (OR 0.38; CI 0.16-0.87, p = 0.03) and increasing age (OR 0.91; CI 0.83-0.99, p = 0.04). Likelihood of live birth was not significantly associated with BMI (OR 1.21; CI 0.83-1.77, p = 0.31), three or four or more prior pregnancy losses (OR 0.93; CI 0.40-2.22, p = 0.87 and OR 0.52; CI 0.19-1.42, p = 0.20, respectively) and prior live births (OR 1.00; CI 0.48-2.08, p = 0.99). AMH < 1 ng/mL was shown to be a stronger predictor of live birth than age using a multivariate model adjusting for age, AMH, and time to conception.
Conclusions: AMH < 1 ng/mL is associated with decreased likelihood of live birth among RPL patients pursuing EM, and may be a stronger predictor of live birth than age in this population.