加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)与全身化疗和贝伐单抗相关,安全性和可行性评估。单中心比较研究。

Matthieu Siebert, Mohammad Alyami, Frederic Mercier, Colin Gallice, Laurent Villeneuve, Nathalie Laplace, Guillaume Passot, Naoual Bakrin, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian
{"title":"加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)与全身化疗和贝伐单抗相关,安全性和可行性评估。单中心比较研究。","authors":"Matthieu Siebert,&nbsp;Mohammad Alyami,&nbsp;Frederic Mercier,&nbsp;Colin Gallice,&nbsp;Laurent Villeneuve,&nbsp;Nathalie Laplace,&nbsp;Guillaume Passot,&nbsp;Naoual Bakrin,&nbsp;Olivier Glehen,&nbsp;Vahan Kepenekian","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising technic for unresectable peritoneal metastasis (PM). Targeted therapies such as bevacizumab have demonstrated their efficacy in advanced colorectal and ovarian cancer. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this bidimensional therapeutic association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively maintained PIPAC database was retrospectively analyzed from December 2015 to March 2018. All patients who underwent PIPAC for unresectable PM were selected. Patients with systemic chemotherapy including bevacizumab (BEVA group) were compared with patients with systemic chemotherapy without bevacizumab (NON-BEVA group). Major morbidity and mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>134 patients underwent 397 PIPAC in Lyon Sud University Hospital. 26 Patients had 88 PIPAC in the BEVA group were compared to 108 patients who had 309 PIPAC in the NON-BEVA group. Patients in the BEVA group demonstrated a higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI 20 vs. 16, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in overall 30-day morbidity (BEVA: 13 (14.8%) vs NON-BEVA: 29 (9.4%); p = 0.147). There was no statistical difference for grade III-IV complications (BEVA: 4 (4.5%) vs NON-BEVA 10 (3.2%); P = 0.521). Major complications from BEVA group were as follow, 2 bowel obstructions, one hematoma and one severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum compound. There was no 30-day mortality in the BEVA group compared to 6 (5.5%) mortality in the NON-BEVA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIPAC associated with bevacizumab is feasible, safe and well tolerated. The potential oncologic benefit of the concomitant use of bevacizumab and PIPAC remains to be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":519500,"journal":{"name":"European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology","volume":"47 1","pages":"139-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.021","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in association with systemic chemotherapy and bevacizumab, evaluation of safety and feasibility. A single center comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Siebert,&nbsp;Mohammad Alyami,&nbsp;Frederic Mercier,&nbsp;Colin Gallice,&nbsp;Laurent Villeneuve,&nbsp;Nathalie Laplace,&nbsp;Guillaume Passot,&nbsp;Naoual Bakrin,&nbsp;Olivier Glehen,&nbsp;Vahan Kepenekian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising technic for unresectable peritoneal metastasis (PM). Targeted therapies such as bevacizumab have demonstrated their efficacy in advanced colorectal and ovarian cancer. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this bidimensional therapeutic association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively maintained PIPAC database was retrospectively analyzed from December 2015 to March 2018. All patients who underwent PIPAC for unresectable PM were selected. Patients with systemic chemotherapy including bevacizumab (BEVA group) were compared with patients with systemic chemotherapy without bevacizumab (NON-BEVA group). Major morbidity and mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>134 patients underwent 397 PIPAC in Lyon Sud University Hospital. 26 Patients had 88 PIPAC in the BEVA group were compared to 108 patients who had 309 PIPAC in the NON-BEVA group. Patients in the BEVA group demonstrated a higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI 20 vs. 16, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in overall 30-day morbidity (BEVA: 13 (14.8%) vs NON-BEVA: 29 (9.4%); p = 0.147). There was no statistical difference for grade III-IV complications (BEVA: 4 (4.5%) vs NON-BEVA 10 (3.2%); P = 0.521). Major complications from BEVA group were as follow, 2 bowel obstructions, one hematoma and one severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum compound. There was no 30-day mortality in the BEVA group compared to 6 (5.5%) mortality in the NON-BEVA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIPAC associated with bevacizumab is feasible, safe and well tolerated. The potential oncologic benefit of the concomitant use of bevacizumab and PIPAC remains to be evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"139-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.021\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

简介:加压腹腔喷雾化疗(PIPAC)是治疗不可切除腹膜转移(PM)的一种很有前途的技术。靶向治疗如贝伐单抗已被证明对晚期结直肠癌和卵巢癌有效。我们的目的是评估这种双向治疗关联的可行性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2015年12月至2018年3月前瞻性维护的PIPAC数据库。所有接受PIPAC治疗不可切除PM的患者均入选。将包括贝伐单抗的全身化疗患者(BEVA组)与不含贝伐单抗的全身化疗患者(NON-BEVA组)进行比较。分析主要发病率和死亡率。结果:里昂大学附属医院134例患者行397次PIPAC, BEVA组26例患者行88次PIPAC,非BEVA组108例患者行309次PIPAC。BEVA组患者表现出更高的腹膜癌指数(PCI 20 vs. 16, p )结论:PIPAC联合贝伐单抗是可行、安全且耐受性良好的。同时使用贝伐单抗和PIPAC的潜在肿瘤学益处仍有待评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in association with systemic chemotherapy and bevacizumab, evaluation of safety and feasibility. A single center comparative study.

Introduction: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising technic for unresectable peritoneal metastasis (PM). Targeted therapies such as bevacizumab have demonstrated their efficacy in advanced colorectal and ovarian cancer. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this bidimensional therapeutic association.

Methods: A prospectively maintained PIPAC database was retrospectively analyzed from December 2015 to March 2018. All patients who underwent PIPAC for unresectable PM were selected. Patients with systemic chemotherapy including bevacizumab (BEVA group) were compared with patients with systemic chemotherapy without bevacizumab (NON-BEVA group). Major morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

Results: 134 patients underwent 397 PIPAC in Lyon Sud University Hospital. 26 Patients had 88 PIPAC in the BEVA group were compared to 108 patients who had 309 PIPAC in the NON-BEVA group. Patients in the BEVA group demonstrated a higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI 20 vs. 16, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in overall 30-day morbidity (BEVA: 13 (14.8%) vs NON-BEVA: 29 (9.4%); p = 0.147). There was no statistical difference for grade III-IV complications (BEVA: 4 (4.5%) vs NON-BEVA 10 (3.2%); P = 0.521). Major complications from BEVA group were as follow, 2 bowel obstructions, one hematoma and one severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum compound. There was no 30-day mortality in the BEVA group compared to 6 (5.5%) mortality in the NON-BEVA group.

Conclusion: PIPAC associated with bevacizumab is feasible, safe and well tolerated. The potential oncologic benefit of the concomitant use of bevacizumab and PIPAC remains to be evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信