幼儿园师生实时互动中句法复杂性的协同适应过程

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Astrid Menninga, Marijn van Dijk, Ralf Cox, Henderien Steenbeek, Paul van Geert
{"title":"幼儿园师生实时互动中句法复杂性的协同适应过程","authors":"Astrid Menninga,&nbsp;Marijn van Dijk,&nbsp;Ralf Cox,&nbsp;Henderien Steenbeek,&nbsp;Paul van Geert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Under the premise that language learning is bidirectional in nature, this study aimed to investigate syntactic coordination within teacher-student interactions by using cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA). Seven teachers' and a group of their students' interactions were repeatedly measured in the course of an intervention in early science education. Results showed changes in the proportion of recurrent points; in case of simple sentences teachers and students became less coordinated over time, whereas in case of complex sentences teachers and students showed increasing coordination. Results also revealed less rigid (more flexible) syntactic coordination, although there were no changes in the relative contribution of teacher and students to this. In the light of the intervention under investigation this is an important result. This means that teachers and students learn to use more complex language and coordinate their language complexity better in order to co-construct science discourse. The application of CRQA provides new insights and contributes to better understanding of the dynamics of syntactic coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":"23 2","pages":"229-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Adaptation Processes of Syntactic Complexity in Real-Time Kindergarten Teacher-Student Interactions.\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Menninga,&nbsp;Marijn van Dijk,&nbsp;Ralf Cox,&nbsp;Henderien Steenbeek,&nbsp;Paul van Geert\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Under the premise that language learning is bidirectional in nature, this study aimed to investigate syntactic coordination within teacher-student interactions by using cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA). Seven teachers' and a group of their students' interactions were repeatedly measured in the course of an intervention in early science education. Results showed changes in the proportion of recurrent points; in case of simple sentences teachers and students became less coordinated over time, whereas in case of complex sentences teachers and students showed increasing coordination. Results also revealed less rigid (more flexible) syntactic coordination, although there were no changes in the relative contribution of teacher and students to this. In the light of the intervention under investigation this is an important result. This means that teachers and students learn to use more complex language and coordinate their language complexity better in order to co-construct science discourse. The application of CRQA provides new insights and contributes to better understanding of the dynamics of syntactic coordination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"229-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在语言学习具有双向性的前提下,本研究旨在通过交叉递归量化分析(cross- recurrent quantification analysis, CRQA)研究师生互动中的句法协调。在早期科学教育的干预过程中,反复测量了七名教师和一组学生的互动。结果显示:复发点比例的变化;在简单句中,随着时间的推移,教师和学生的协调性越来越差,而在复杂句中,教师和学生的协调性越来越高。结果还显示,尽管教师和学生在这方面的相对贡献没有变化,但刚性(更灵活)的句法协调程度有所降低。鉴于正在调查的干预措施,这是一个重要的结果。这意味着教师和学生学习使用更复杂的语言,并更好地协调他们的语言复杂性,以共同构建科学话语。CRQA的应用提供了新的见解,有助于更好地理解句法协调的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-Adaptation Processes of Syntactic Complexity in Real-Time Kindergarten Teacher-Student Interactions.

Under the premise that language learning is bidirectional in nature, this study aimed to investigate syntactic coordination within teacher-student interactions by using cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA). Seven teachers' and a group of their students' interactions were repeatedly measured in the course of an intervention in early science education. Results showed changes in the proportion of recurrent points; in case of simple sentences teachers and students became less coordinated over time, whereas in case of complex sentences teachers and students showed increasing coordination. Results also revealed less rigid (more flexible) syntactic coordination, although there were no changes in the relative contribution of teacher and students to this. In the light of the intervention under investigation this is an important result. This means that teachers and students learn to use more complex language and coordinate their language complexity better in order to co-construct science discourse. The application of CRQA provides new insights and contributes to better understanding of the dynamics of syntactic coordination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信