十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤的手术治疗及预后。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica Pub Date : 2019-01-01
L Gu, P A Khadaroo, M Chen, H Qian, H Zhu, X Li, J Pan, X Zhong, X Wang
{"title":"十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤的手术治疗及预后。","authors":"L Gu,&nbsp;P A Khadaroo,&nbsp;M Chen,&nbsp;H Qian,&nbsp;H Zhu,&nbsp;X Li,&nbsp;J Pan,&nbsp;X Zhong,&nbsp;X Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>This retrospective study purports to examine these characteristics and compare the surgical procedures available and appropriate for the treatment of patients affected by duodenal GISTs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective examination of reports and studies carried out between May 2012 and March 2017, and covering patients with primary GISTs of the duodenum was performed using modules from the SPSS package. Comparisons of treatment effects resulting from the administration of two differential methods of surgical treatment namely pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and limited resection (LR), were effected on the reports of the GIST patients thus selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of these 62 patients who had undergone resection of duodenal GISTs, 47 (76%) had limited resection (LR) and 15 (24%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In Multivariate analyses, tumor size was an independent predictive factor for recurrence (p=0.008). ASA, tumor size, and PD were independent and significant prognostic factors on OS (p=0.021, p=0.024, and p=0.030, respectively). In the very low and low risk group, and high-risk group, there were no significant differences in the RFS (recurrence-free survival) and OS (overall survival) between the LR and PD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When technically feasible, LR should be given due consideration as a reliable and curative option for duodenal GISTs achieving satisfactory RFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50942,"journal":{"name":"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica","volume":"82 1","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management and outcomes of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.\",\"authors\":\"L Gu,&nbsp;P A Khadaroo,&nbsp;M Chen,&nbsp;H Qian,&nbsp;H Zhu,&nbsp;X Li,&nbsp;J Pan,&nbsp;X Zhong,&nbsp;X Wang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>This retrospective study purports to examine these characteristics and compare the surgical procedures available and appropriate for the treatment of patients affected by duodenal GISTs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective examination of reports and studies carried out between May 2012 and March 2017, and covering patients with primary GISTs of the duodenum was performed using modules from the SPSS package. Comparisons of treatment effects resulting from the administration of two differential methods of surgical treatment namely pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and limited resection (LR), were effected on the reports of the GIST patients thus selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of these 62 patients who had undergone resection of duodenal GISTs, 47 (76%) had limited resection (LR) and 15 (24%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In Multivariate analyses, tumor size was an independent predictive factor for recurrence (p=0.008). ASA, tumor size, and PD were independent and significant prognostic factors on OS (p=0.021, p=0.024, and p=0.030, respectively). In the very low and low risk group, and high-risk group, there were no significant differences in the RFS (recurrence-free survival) and OS (overall survival) between the LR and PD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When technically feasible, LR should be given due consideration as a reliable and curative option for duodenal GISTs achieving satisfactory RFS and OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"11-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:本回顾性研究旨在检查这些特征,并比较治疗十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤患者的可用和合适的手术方法。患者和方法:使用SPSS软件包中的模块对2012年5月至2017年3月期间进行的报告和研究进行回顾性检查,涵盖原发性十二指肠gist患者。比较两种不同的手术治疗方法,即胰十二指肠切除术(PD)和有限切除术(LR)对胃肠道间质瘤患者报告的治疗效果。结果:在62例行十二指肠gist切除术的患者中,47例(76%)行有限切除术(LR), 15例(24%)行胰十二指肠切除术(PD)。在多变量分析中,肿瘤大小是复发的独立预测因素(p=0.008)。ASA、肿瘤大小、PD是影响OS的独立且显著的预后因素(p=0.021、p=0.024、p=0.030)。在极低、低风险组和高风险组,LR组和PD组的无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)无显著差异。结论:在技术可行的情况下,对于获得满意的RFS和OS的十二指肠gist,应适当考虑LR作为可靠和治愈的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management and outcomes of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Background and study aims: This retrospective study purports to examine these characteristics and compare the surgical procedures available and appropriate for the treatment of patients affected by duodenal GISTs.

Patients and methods: A retrospective examination of reports and studies carried out between May 2012 and March 2017, and covering patients with primary GISTs of the duodenum was performed using modules from the SPSS package. Comparisons of treatment effects resulting from the administration of two differential methods of surgical treatment namely pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and limited resection (LR), were effected on the reports of the GIST patients thus selected.

Results: Out of these 62 patients who had undergone resection of duodenal GISTs, 47 (76%) had limited resection (LR) and 15 (24%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In Multivariate analyses, tumor size was an independent predictive factor for recurrence (p=0.008). ASA, tumor size, and PD were independent and significant prognostic factors on OS (p=0.021, p=0.024, and p=0.030, respectively). In the very low and low risk group, and high-risk group, there were no significant differences in the RFS (recurrence-free survival) and OS (overall survival) between the LR and PD groups.

Conclusions: When technically feasible, LR should be given due consideration as a reliable and curative option for duodenal GISTs achieving satisfactory RFS and OS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica
Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信