José Antonio Delgado, Daniel Morell-Garcia, Josep Miquel Bauça
{"title":"溶血干扰研究:以钠离子为例。","authors":"José Antonio Delgado, Daniel Morell-Garcia, Josep Miquel Bauça","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite many studies assessing hemolysis interference in almost every clinically relevant magnitude, sodium has poorly been assessed. Our aim was to evaluate hemolysis interference on plasma sodium, using different strategies of hemolysis preparation, at different baseline sodium ion concentrations and bias specifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two different strategies were used for the preparation of hemolysis from lithium heparin blood samples. Repeatibility was calculated at two levels for each strategy and interferograms were outlined for both approaches at sodium concentrations between 130-145 mmol/L. Results were interpreted according to different specifications: reference change value, RiLiBAK, Westgard's database, RCPA-QAP and CLIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coefficients of variation of the hemolyzed samples using the first strategy were lower than for the second strategy (0.23-0.78% vs 0.57-48.6%, for 0.2 g/dL free Hb and 0.28-0.44% vs 0.40-135.1%, for 0.9 g/dL free Hb). Statistically significant differences were seen when comparing the slopes of the pairs of interferograms at each sodium concentration obtained by both strategies (p<0.001 for 130 mmol/L; p=0.068 for 135 mmol/L; p=0.002 for 140 mmol/L and p=0.001 for 145 mmol/L). Hemolysis cut-off values were generally independent of the sodium concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reproducibility of hemolysate preparation is procedure-dependent. A greater standardization is needed for the preparation of a true hemolysate to better quantify the degree of interference of clinically relevant analytes, especially those with higher complexity such as sodium. We found a concentration-independent cut-off value for the hemolysis index that allows the establishment of a single and robust value in every laboratory, according to their quality specifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":193105,"journal":{"name":"EJIFCC","volume":"30 1","pages":"25-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/a7/ejifcc-30-025.PMC6416812.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemolysis Interference Studies: The Particular Case of Sodium Ion.\",\"authors\":\"José Antonio Delgado, Daniel Morell-Garcia, Josep Miquel Bauça\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite many studies assessing hemolysis interference in almost every clinically relevant magnitude, sodium has poorly been assessed. Our aim was to evaluate hemolysis interference on plasma sodium, using different strategies of hemolysis preparation, at different baseline sodium ion concentrations and bias specifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two different strategies were used for the preparation of hemolysis from lithium heparin blood samples. Repeatibility was calculated at two levels for each strategy and interferograms were outlined for both approaches at sodium concentrations between 130-145 mmol/L. Results were interpreted according to different specifications: reference change value, RiLiBAK, Westgard's database, RCPA-QAP and CLIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coefficients of variation of the hemolyzed samples using the first strategy were lower than for the second strategy (0.23-0.78% vs 0.57-48.6%, for 0.2 g/dL free Hb and 0.28-0.44% vs 0.40-135.1%, for 0.9 g/dL free Hb). Statistically significant differences were seen when comparing the slopes of the pairs of interferograms at each sodium concentration obtained by both strategies (p<0.001 for 130 mmol/L; p=0.068 for 135 mmol/L; p=0.002 for 140 mmol/L and p=0.001 for 145 mmol/L). Hemolysis cut-off values were generally independent of the sodium concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reproducibility of hemolysate preparation is procedure-dependent. A greater standardization is needed for the preparation of a true hemolysate to better quantify the degree of interference of clinically relevant analytes, especially those with higher complexity such as sodium. We found a concentration-independent cut-off value for the hemolysis index that allows the establishment of a single and robust value in every laboratory, according to their quality specifications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJIFCC\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"25-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/a7/ejifcc-30-025.PMC6416812.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJIFCC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJIFCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管许多研究评估了几乎所有临床相关程度的溶血干扰,但钠的评估很少。我们的目的是评估在不同基线钠离子浓度和偏差规格下,使用不同的溶血制剂策略对血浆钠的溶血干扰。方法:采用两种不同的方法制备肝素锂溶血剂。在钠浓度为130-145 mmol/L时,计算了每种方法在两个水平上的重复性,并绘制了两种方法的干涉图。根据参考变化值、RiLiBAK、Westgard’s数据库、rppa - qap和CLIA等不同规范对结果进行解释。结果:使用第一种策略的溶血样品变异系数低于第二种策略(0.2 g/dL游离Hb为0.23-0.78% vs 0.57-48.6%, 0.9 g/dL游离Hb为0.28-0.44% vs 0.40-135.1%)。当比较两种方法在不同钠浓度下获得的干涉图对斜率时,可以看到统计学上的显著差异(结论:溶血制剂的重现性依赖于程序。真正溶血物的制备需要更大的标准化,以更好地量化临床相关分析物的干扰程度,特别是那些具有较高复杂性的分析物,如钠。我们发现了溶血指数的一个与浓度无关的临界值,该临界值允许在每个实验室根据其质量规范建立一个单一且可靠的值。
Hemolysis Interference Studies: The Particular Case of Sodium Ion.
Background: Despite many studies assessing hemolysis interference in almost every clinically relevant magnitude, sodium has poorly been assessed. Our aim was to evaluate hemolysis interference on plasma sodium, using different strategies of hemolysis preparation, at different baseline sodium ion concentrations and bias specifications.
Methods: Two different strategies were used for the preparation of hemolysis from lithium heparin blood samples. Repeatibility was calculated at two levels for each strategy and interferograms were outlined for both approaches at sodium concentrations between 130-145 mmol/L. Results were interpreted according to different specifications: reference change value, RiLiBAK, Westgard's database, RCPA-QAP and CLIA.
Results: The coefficients of variation of the hemolyzed samples using the first strategy were lower than for the second strategy (0.23-0.78% vs 0.57-48.6%, for 0.2 g/dL free Hb and 0.28-0.44% vs 0.40-135.1%, for 0.9 g/dL free Hb). Statistically significant differences were seen when comparing the slopes of the pairs of interferograms at each sodium concentration obtained by both strategies (p<0.001 for 130 mmol/L; p=0.068 for 135 mmol/L; p=0.002 for 140 mmol/L and p=0.001 for 145 mmol/L). Hemolysis cut-off values were generally independent of the sodium concentration.
Conclusions: Reproducibility of hemolysate preparation is procedure-dependent. A greater standardization is needed for the preparation of a true hemolysate to better quantify the degree of interference of clinically relevant analytes, especially those with higher complexity such as sodium. We found a concentration-independent cut-off value for the hemolysis index that allows the establishment of a single and robust value in every laboratory, according to their quality specifications.