纪念“38号病人”——所有试管婴儿母亲的母亲?

Q1 Social Sciences
Fiona Littleton , Susan Bewley
{"title":"纪念“38号病人”——所有试管婴儿母亲的母亲?","authors":"Fiona Littleton ,&nbsp;Susan Bewley","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This commentary addresses one aspect of the early history of IVF in Britain. Specific data are re-examined from the recently published, anonymized database of medical records from the Oldham period of research conducted by Robert Edwards, Patrick Steptoe and their team of assistants between 1969 and 1978. By focusing on a reformulation of the ‘scheduled treatment cycles per patient’, attention is drawn to the small, but nevertheless not insignificant, number of subjects who returned to Oldham at least five times or more to undergo innovative procedures and/or receive other experimental treatments over the duration of the research project. These multiple efforts are contrasted with the single or double treatment cycles received by the majority of the infertile women involved, including the only two experiencing live births, Lesley Brown and Grace Montgomery. The re-presented data facilitates new interpretations and raises fresh research questions about the nature of contemporary and present characterisations of the major protagonists in the ‘IVF story’, the identity of those women who originally took part and the origin of and reasons for discrepancies in the records maintained about research subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Honouring ‘Patient 38’ – a mother of all IVF mothers?\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Littleton ,&nbsp;Susan Bewley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This commentary addresses one aspect of the early history of IVF in Britain. Specific data are re-examined from the recently published, anonymized database of medical records from the Oldham period of research conducted by Robert Edwards, Patrick Steptoe and their team of assistants between 1969 and 1978. By focusing on a reformulation of the ‘scheduled treatment cycles per patient’, attention is drawn to the small, but nevertheless not insignificant, number of subjects who returned to Oldham at least five times or more to undergo innovative procedures and/or receive other experimental treatments over the duration of the research project. These multiple efforts are contrasted with the single or double treatment cycles received by the majority of the infertile women involved, including the only two experiencing live births, Lesley Brown and Grace Montgomery. The re-presented data facilitates new interpretations and raises fresh research questions about the nature of contemporary and present characterisations of the major protagonists in the ‘IVF story’, the identity of those women who originally took part and the origin of and reasons for discrepancies in the records maintained about research subjects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661818300303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661818300303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇评论论述了英国试管婴儿早期历史的一个方面。具体数据重新检查了最近公布的匿名数据库,这些数据库是由罗伯特·爱德华兹、帕特里克·斯特普托和他们的助手团队在1969年至1978年期间进行的奥尔德姆时期的研究。通过对“每位患者的计划治疗周期”的重新制定,将注意力吸引到数量不多但并非微不足道的受试者上,这些受试者在研究项目期间至少五次或更多次返回Oldham接受创新程序和/或接受其他实验性治疗。这些多重努力与大多数不孕妇女接受的单次或两次治疗周期形成鲜明对比,其中包括仅有的两名活产妇女,莱斯利·布朗和格蕾丝·蒙哥马利。重新呈现的数据促进了新的解释,并提出了新的研究问题,即“试管婴儿故事”中主要主角的当代和当前特征的本质,最初参与研究的妇女的身份,以及关于研究对象的记录中差异的起源和原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Honouring ‘Patient 38’ – a mother of all IVF mothers?

This commentary addresses one aspect of the early history of IVF in Britain. Specific data are re-examined from the recently published, anonymized database of medical records from the Oldham period of research conducted by Robert Edwards, Patrick Steptoe and their team of assistants between 1969 and 1978. By focusing on a reformulation of the ‘scheduled treatment cycles per patient’, attention is drawn to the small, but nevertheless not insignificant, number of subjects who returned to Oldham at least five times or more to undergo innovative procedures and/or receive other experimental treatments over the duration of the research project. These multiple efforts are contrasted with the single or double treatment cycles received by the majority of the infertile women involved, including the only two experiencing live births, Lesley Brown and Grace Montgomery. The re-presented data facilitates new interpretations and raises fresh research questions about the nature of contemporary and present characterisations of the major protagonists in the ‘IVF story’, the identity of those women who originally took part and the origin of and reasons for discrepancies in the records maintained about research subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信