侥幸的猜测?Rasch测量理论在南非五年级数学成绩数据中的应用。

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Sarah Bansilal, Caroline Long, Andrea Juan
{"title":"侥幸的猜测?Rasch测量理论在南非五年级数学成绩数据中的应用。","authors":"Sarah Bansilal,&nbsp;Caroline Long,&nbsp;Andrea Juan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of multiple-choice items in assessments in the interest of increased efficiency brings associated challenges, notably the phenomenon of guessing. The purpose of this study is to use Rasch measurement theory to investigate the extent of guessing in a sample of responses taken from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015. A method of checking the extent of the guessing in test data, a tailored analysis, is applied to the data from a sample of 2188 learners on a subset of items. The analysis confirms prior research that showed that as the difficulty of the item increases, the probability of guessing also increases. An outcome of the tailored analysis is that items at the high proficiency end of the continuum, increase in difficulty. A consequence of item difficulties being estimated as relatively lower than they would be without guessing, is that learner proficiency at the higher end is under estimated while the achievement of learners with lower proficiencies are over estimated. Hence, it is important that finer analysis of systemic data takes into account guessing, so that more nuanced information can be obtained to inform subsequent cycles of education planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"20 2","pages":"206-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lucky Guess? Applying Rasch Measurement Theory to Grade 5 South African Mathematics Achievement Data.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Bansilal,&nbsp;Caroline Long,&nbsp;Andrea Juan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of multiple-choice items in assessments in the interest of increased efficiency brings associated challenges, notably the phenomenon of guessing. The purpose of this study is to use Rasch measurement theory to investigate the extent of guessing in a sample of responses taken from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015. A method of checking the extent of the guessing in test data, a tailored analysis, is applied to the data from a sample of 2188 learners on a subset of items. The analysis confirms prior research that showed that as the difficulty of the item increases, the probability of guessing also increases. An outcome of the tailored analysis is that items at the high proficiency end of the continuum, increase in difficulty. A consequence of item difficulties being estimated as relatively lower than they would be without guessing, is that learner proficiency at the higher end is under estimated while the achievement of learners with lower proficiencies are over estimated. Hence, it is important that finer analysis of systemic data takes into account guessing, so that more nuanced information can be obtained to inform subsequent cycles of education planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"206-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高效率,在评估中使用多项选择题带来了相关的挑战,特别是猜测现象。本研究的目的是使用Rasch测量理论来调查2015年国际数学与科学趋势研究(TIMSS)中回答样本中的猜测程度。一种检查测试数据中猜测程度的方法,一种量身定制的分析,应用于来自2188个学习者样本的数据。该分析证实了先前的研究,即随着题目难度的增加,猜测的概率也会增加。量身定制分析的结果是,在连续体的高熟练度端,难度增加。项目难度的估计值相对低于他们在没有猜测的情况下的估计值的结果是,高水平学习者的熟练程度被低估了,而低水平学习者的成就被高估了。因此,对系统数据进行更细致的分析,考虑到猜测是很重要的,这样才能获得更细致的信息,为后续的教育规划周期提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lucky Guess? Applying Rasch Measurement Theory to Grade 5 South African Mathematics Achievement Data.

The use of multiple-choice items in assessments in the interest of increased efficiency brings associated challenges, notably the phenomenon of guessing. The purpose of this study is to use Rasch measurement theory to investigate the extent of guessing in a sample of responses taken from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015. A method of checking the extent of the guessing in test data, a tailored analysis, is applied to the data from a sample of 2188 learners on a subset of items. The analysis confirms prior research that showed that as the difficulty of the item increases, the probability of guessing also increases. An outcome of the tailored analysis is that items at the high proficiency end of the continuum, increase in difficulty. A consequence of item difficulties being estimated as relatively lower than they would be without guessing, is that learner proficiency at the higher end is under estimated while the achievement of learners with lower proficiencies are over estimated. Hence, it is important that finer analysis of systemic data takes into account guessing, so that more nuanced information can be obtained to inform subsequent cycles of education planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信