评估连续被动运动(CPM)和主动膝关节运动装置的足部负荷。

Benedikt Stolz, Casper Grim, Christoph Lutter, Kolja Gelse, Monika Schell, Bernd Swoboda, Hans-Dieter Carl, Thilo Hotfiel
{"title":"评估连续被动运动(CPM)和主动膝关节运动装置的足部负荷。","authors":"Benedikt Stolz,&nbsp;Casper Grim,&nbsp;Christoph Lutter,&nbsp;Kolja Gelse,&nbsp;Monika Schell,&nbsp;Bernd Swoboda,&nbsp;Hans-Dieter Carl,&nbsp;Thilo Hotfiel","doi":"10.1055/a-0648-8699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous passive motion (CPM) and active knee joint motion devices are commonly applied after various surgical procedures. Despite the growing use of active motion devices, there is a paucity of data comparing plantar loads between the different mobilization techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate foot loads during knee joint mobilization in continuous passive and active knee joint motion devices and to compare this data to the physiological load of full weight-bearing.</p><p><strong>Patients/material and methods: </strong>Fifteen healthy participants (7 women and 8 men, 25 ± 3 years, 66 ± 6 kg, 175 ± 10 cm, BMI 21.9 ± 2) were recruited. Plantar loads were measured via dynamic pedobarography using a continuous passive motion device (ARTROMOT-K1, ORMED GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) and an active motion device (CAMOped, OPED AG, Cham, Switzerland), each with a restricted range of motion of 0-0-90° (ex/flex) and free ROM for the knee joint. For the active motion device, cycles were performed at four different resistance levels (0-III). Data were assessed using the pedar<sup>®</sup> X system (Novel Inc., Munich, Germany), which monitors loads from the foot-sole interface. Force values were compared between motion devices and normal gait, which served as the reference for conditions of full weight-bearing. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normal gait revealed peak forces of 694 ± 96 N, defined as 100 %. The CPM device produced plantar forces of less than 1.5 N. Using the active motion device in the setting of 0-0-90° produced foot loads of < 1.5 N (resistance 0-II) and 3.4 ± 9.3 N with a resistance of III (p < 0.001). Conditions of free ROM resulted in foot loads of 4.5 ± 4.5 N (resistance 0), 7.7 ± 10.7 N (resistance I), 6.7 ± 10.4 (resistance II) and 6.7 ± 6.9 N with a resistance of III (p < 0.001), corresponding to 0.6 %, 1.1 %, 1.0 % and 1.0 % of full weight-bearing, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Motion exercises of the knee joint can be performed both with passive and active devices in accordance with strict weight-bearing restrictions, which are often recommended by surgeons. Also, active motion devices can be used when the ankle joint or foot have to be offloaded. Further studies assessing intraarticular joint load conditions have to be performed to confirm the findings obtained in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520779,"journal":{"name":"Sportverletzung Sportschaden : Organ der Gesellschaft fur Orthopadisch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin","volume":" ","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-0648-8699","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Foot Loads in Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) and Active Knee Joint Motion Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Stolz,&nbsp;Casper Grim,&nbsp;Christoph Lutter,&nbsp;Kolja Gelse,&nbsp;Monika Schell,&nbsp;Bernd Swoboda,&nbsp;Hans-Dieter Carl,&nbsp;Thilo Hotfiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-0648-8699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous passive motion (CPM) and active knee joint motion devices are commonly applied after various surgical procedures. Despite the growing use of active motion devices, there is a paucity of data comparing plantar loads between the different mobilization techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate foot loads during knee joint mobilization in continuous passive and active knee joint motion devices and to compare this data to the physiological load of full weight-bearing.</p><p><strong>Patients/material and methods: </strong>Fifteen healthy participants (7 women and 8 men, 25 ± 3 years, 66 ± 6 kg, 175 ± 10 cm, BMI 21.9 ± 2) were recruited. Plantar loads were measured via dynamic pedobarography using a continuous passive motion device (ARTROMOT-K1, ORMED GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) and an active motion device (CAMOped, OPED AG, Cham, Switzerland), each with a restricted range of motion of 0-0-90° (ex/flex) and free ROM for the knee joint. For the active motion device, cycles were performed at four different resistance levels (0-III). Data were assessed using the pedar<sup>®</sup> X system (Novel Inc., Munich, Germany), which monitors loads from the foot-sole interface. Force values were compared between motion devices and normal gait, which served as the reference for conditions of full weight-bearing. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normal gait revealed peak forces of 694 ± 96 N, defined as 100 %. The CPM device produced plantar forces of less than 1.5 N. Using the active motion device in the setting of 0-0-90° produced foot loads of < 1.5 N (resistance 0-II) and 3.4 ± 9.3 N with a resistance of III (p < 0.001). Conditions of free ROM resulted in foot loads of 4.5 ± 4.5 N (resistance 0), 7.7 ± 10.7 N (resistance I), 6.7 ± 10.4 (resistance II) and 6.7 ± 6.9 N with a resistance of III (p < 0.001), corresponding to 0.6 %, 1.1 %, 1.0 % and 1.0 % of full weight-bearing, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Motion exercises of the knee joint can be performed both with passive and active devices in accordance with strict weight-bearing restrictions, which are often recommended by surgeons. Also, active motion devices can be used when the ankle joint or foot have to be offloaded. Further studies assessing intraarticular joint load conditions have to be performed to confirm the findings obtained in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sportverletzung Sportschaden : Organ der Gesellschaft fur Orthopadisch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-0648-8699\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sportverletzung Sportschaden : Organ der Gesellschaft fur Orthopadisch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0648-8699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sportverletzung Sportschaden : Organ der Gesellschaft fur Orthopadisch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0648-8699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:持续被动运动(CPM)和主动膝关节运动装置通常在各种外科手术后应用。尽管越来越多地使用主动运动装置,但比较不同运动技术之间足底负荷的数据缺乏。本研究的目的是调查在连续被动和主动膝关节运动装置中膝关节活动期间的足部负荷,并将这些数据与完全负重的生理负荷进行比较。患者/材料和方法:招募15名健康受试者(女性7名,男性8名,年龄25±3岁,66±6 kg, 175±10 cm, BMI 21.9±2)。使用连续被动运动装置(ARTROMOT-K1, ORMED GmbH, Freiburg, Germany)和主动运动装置(camped, op AG, Cham, Switzerland),通过动态足镜测量足底负荷,每个装置的运动范围为0-0-90°(前/屈)和膝关节自由ROM。对于主动运动装置,在四个不同的阻力水平(0-III)下进行循环。数据使用pedar®X系统(Novel Inc., Munich, Germany)进行评估,该系统监测脚底界面的载荷。比较运动装置与正常步态的受力值,为完全负重工况提供参考。结果p值:正常步态的峰值力为694±96 N,定义为100%。CPM装置产生的足底力小于1.5 n。在0-0-90°的环境下使用主动运动装置产生的足部负荷为。结论:在严格的负重限制下,被动和主动装置均可进行膝关节运动锻炼,这是外科医生经常推荐的。此外,当踝关节或脚必须卸载时,可以使用主动运动设备。评估关节内关节负荷状况的进一步研究必须进行,以证实本研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Foot Loads in Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) and Active Knee Joint Motion Devices.

Background: Continuous passive motion (CPM) and active knee joint motion devices are commonly applied after various surgical procedures. Despite the growing use of active motion devices, there is a paucity of data comparing plantar loads between the different mobilization techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate foot loads during knee joint mobilization in continuous passive and active knee joint motion devices and to compare this data to the physiological load of full weight-bearing.

Patients/material and methods: Fifteen healthy participants (7 women and 8 men, 25 ± 3 years, 66 ± 6 kg, 175 ± 10 cm, BMI 21.9 ± 2) were recruited. Plantar loads were measured via dynamic pedobarography using a continuous passive motion device (ARTROMOT-K1, ORMED GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) and an active motion device (CAMOped, OPED AG, Cham, Switzerland), each with a restricted range of motion of 0-0-90° (ex/flex) and free ROM for the knee joint. For the active motion device, cycles were performed at four different resistance levels (0-III). Data were assessed using the pedar® X system (Novel Inc., Munich, Germany), which monitors loads from the foot-sole interface. Force values were compared between motion devices and normal gait, which served as the reference for conditions of full weight-bearing. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Normal gait revealed peak forces of 694 ± 96 N, defined as 100 %. The CPM device produced plantar forces of less than 1.5 N. Using the active motion device in the setting of 0-0-90° produced foot loads of < 1.5 N (resistance 0-II) and 3.4 ± 9.3 N with a resistance of III (p < 0.001). Conditions of free ROM resulted in foot loads of 4.5 ± 4.5 N (resistance 0), 7.7 ± 10.7 N (resistance I), 6.7 ± 10.4 (resistance II) and 6.7 ± 6.9 N with a resistance of III (p < 0.001), corresponding to 0.6 %, 1.1 %, 1.0 % and 1.0 % of full weight-bearing, respectively.

Conclusion: Motion exercises of the knee joint can be performed both with passive and active devices in accordance with strict weight-bearing restrictions, which are often recommended by surgeons. Also, active motion devices can be used when the ankle joint or foot have to be offloaded. Further studies assessing intraarticular joint load conditions have to be performed to confirm the findings obtained in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信