氧化锆和二硅酸锂树脂胶结牙本质的脱粘机理。

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2019-01-24 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23337931.2018.1561188
Mina Aker Sagen, Ketil Kvam, Eystein Ivar Ruyter, Hans Jacob Rønold
{"title":"氧化锆和二硅酸锂树脂胶结牙本质的脱粘机理。","authors":"Mina Aker Sagen,&nbsp;Ketil Kvam,&nbsp;Eystein Ivar Ruyter,&nbsp;Hans Jacob Rønold","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2018.1561188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate cemented to dentin mimicking what could occur in a clinical setting. A null hypothesis of no difference in tensile bond strength between groups of zirconia and lithium disilicate cemented with resin cements was also tested. Zirconia rods (<i>n</i> = 100) were randomly assigned to two different surface treatment groups; air borne particle abrasion and hot etching by potassium hydrogen difluoride (KHF<sub>2</sub>). Lithium disilicate rods (<i>n</i> = 50) were surface etched by hydrofluoric acid (HF). Five different dual cure resin cements were used for cementing rods to bovine dentin. Ten rods of each test group were cemented with each cement. Test specimens were thermocycled before tensile bond strength testing. Fracture morphology was visualized by light microscope. Mean surface roughness (Sa value) was calculated for randomly selected rods. Cohesive fracture in cement was the most frequent observed fracture morphology. Combination of adhesive and cohesive fractures were second most common. Fracture characterized as an adhesive between rod and cement was not observed for KHF<sub>2</sub> etched zirconia. Highest mean tensile bond strength was observed when cementing air borne particle abraded zirconia with Variolink Esthetic (Ivoclar Vivadent). All surface treatments resulted in Sa values that were significant different from each other. The number of cohesive cement fractures observed suggested that the cement was the weakest link in bonding of zirconia and lithium disilicate.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"5 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2018.1561188","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin.\",\"authors\":\"Mina Aker Sagen,&nbsp;Ketil Kvam,&nbsp;Eystein Ivar Ruyter,&nbsp;Hans Jacob Rønold\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337931.2018.1561188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate cemented to dentin mimicking what could occur in a clinical setting. A null hypothesis of no difference in tensile bond strength between groups of zirconia and lithium disilicate cemented with resin cements was also tested. Zirconia rods (<i>n</i> = 100) were randomly assigned to two different surface treatment groups; air borne particle abrasion and hot etching by potassium hydrogen difluoride (KHF<sub>2</sub>). Lithium disilicate rods (<i>n</i> = 50) were surface etched by hydrofluoric acid (HF). Five different dual cure resin cements were used for cementing rods to bovine dentin. Ten rods of each test group were cemented with each cement. Test specimens were thermocycled before tensile bond strength testing. Fracture morphology was visualized by light microscope. Mean surface roughness (Sa value) was calculated for randomly selected rods. Cohesive fracture in cement was the most frequent observed fracture morphology. Combination of adhesive and cohesive fractures were second most common. Fracture characterized as an adhesive between rod and cement was not observed for KHF<sub>2</sub> etched zirconia. Highest mean tensile bond strength was observed when cementing air borne particle abraded zirconia with Variolink Esthetic (Ivoclar Vivadent). All surface treatments resulted in Sa values that were significant different from each other. The number of cohesive cement fractures observed suggested that the cement was the weakest link in bonding of zirconia and lithium disilicate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"22-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2018.1561188\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1561188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1561188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

评估氧化锆和二硅酸锂胶结到牙本质的脱粘机制,模拟在临床环境中可能发生的情况。用树脂胶结剂粘合的氧化锆和二硅酸锂之间的抗拉强度无差异的零假设也被检验。氧化锆棒(n = 100)随机分为两个不同的表面处理组;二氟化氢钾(KHF2)空气颗粒磨损和热蚀刻。用氢氟酸(HF)蚀刻二硅酸锂棒(n = 50)表面。采用五种不同的双固化树脂胶结剂对牛牙本质进行棒固接。每组10根棒材用每种水泥进行胶结。试件在拉伸粘结强度测试前进行热循环。光镜下观察断口形貌。随机选择棒材计算平均表面粗糙度(Sa值)。水泥内聚性断裂是最常见的断裂形态。粘连性和内聚性骨折的合并是第二常见的。在KHF2蚀刻氧化锆中未观察到以棒和水泥之间粘接剂为特征的骨折。用Variolink美学(Ivoclar Vivadent)胶结空气颗粒磨损的氧化锆时,观察到最高的平均拉伸强度。不同表面处理导致的Sa值差异显著。黏结水泥裂缝的数量表明,水泥是氧化锆与二硅酸锂结合的最薄弱环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin.

Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin.

Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin.

Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin.

To evaluate debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate cemented to dentin mimicking what could occur in a clinical setting. A null hypothesis of no difference in tensile bond strength between groups of zirconia and lithium disilicate cemented with resin cements was also tested. Zirconia rods (n = 100) were randomly assigned to two different surface treatment groups; air borne particle abrasion and hot etching by potassium hydrogen difluoride (KHF2). Lithium disilicate rods (n = 50) were surface etched by hydrofluoric acid (HF). Five different dual cure resin cements were used for cementing rods to bovine dentin. Ten rods of each test group were cemented with each cement. Test specimens were thermocycled before tensile bond strength testing. Fracture morphology was visualized by light microscope. Mean surface roughness (Sa value) was calculated for randomly selected rods. Cohesive fracture in cement was the most frequent observed fracture morphology. Combination of adhesive and cohesive fractures were second most common. Fracture characterized as an adhesive between rod and cement was not observed for KHF2 etched zirconia. Highest mean tensile bond strength was observed when cementing air borne particle abraded zirconia with Variolink Esthetic (Ivoclar Vivadent). All surface treatments resulted in Sa values that were significant different from each other. The number of cohesive cement fractures observed suggested that the cement was the weakest link in bonding of zirconia and lithium disilicate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信