轻轻地做!:用于光电子能谱的碱金属-固体电解质界面的原位制备

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Joshua S. Gibson, Sudarshan Narayanan, Jack E. N. Swallow, Pardeep Kumar-Thakur, Mauro Pasta, Tien-Lin Lee and Robert S. Weatherup
{"title":"轻轻地做!:用于光电子能谱的碱金属-固体电解质界面的原位制备","authors":"Joshua S. Gibson, Sudarshan Narayanan, Jack E. N. Swallow, Pardeep Kumar-Thakur, Mauro Pasta, Tien-Lin Lee and Robert S. Weatherup","doi":"10.1039/D1FD00118C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The key charge transfer processes in electrochemical energy storage devices occur at electrode–electrolyte interfaces, which are typically buried, making it challenging to access their interfacial chemistry. In the case of Li-ion batteries, metallic Li electrodes hold promise for increasing energy and power densities and, when used in conjunction with solid electrolytes, the adverse safety implications associated with dendrite formation in organic liquid electrolytes can potentially be overcome. To better understand the stability of solid electrolytes when in contact with alkali metals and the reactions that occur, here we consider the deposition of thin (~10 nm) alkali metal films onto solid electrolyte surfaces, where the metal is thin enough that X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy can probe the buried electrode–electrolyte interface. We highlight the importance of <em>in situ</em> alkali metal deposition by assessing the contaminant species that are present after glovebox handling and the use of ‘inert’ transfer devices. Consequently, we compare and contrast three available methods for <em>in situ</em> alkali-metal deposition; Li sputter deposition, Li evaporation, and Li plating induced by e<small><sup>?</sup></small> flood-gun irradiation. Studies on both a sulphide solid electrolyte (Li<small><sub>6</sub></small>PS<small><sub>5</sub></small>Cl), and a single-layer graphene probe surface reveal that the more energetic Li deposition methods, such as sputtering, can induce surface damage and interfacial mixing that are not seen with thermal evaporation. This indicates that the appropriate selection of the Li deposition method for <em>in situ</em> studies is required to observe representative behaviour, and the results of previous studies involving energetic deposition may warrant further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":76,"journal":{"name":"Faraday Discussions","volume":"236 ","pages":" 267-287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2022/fd/d1fd00118c?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gently does it!: in situ preparation of alkali metal–solid electrolyte interfaces for photoelectron spectroscopy†\",\"authors\":\"Joshua S. Gibson, Sudarshan Narayanan, Jack E. N. Swallow, Pardeep Kumar-Thakur, Mauro Pasta, Tien-Lin Lee and Robert S. Weatherup\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D1FD00118C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The key charge transfer processes in electrochemical energy storage devices occur at electrode–electrolyte interfaces, which are typically buried, making it challenging to access their interfacial chemistry. In the case of Li-ion batteries, metallic Li electrodes hold promise for increasing energy and power densities and, when used in conjunction with solid electrolytes, the adverse safety implications associated with dendrite formation in organic liquid electrolytes can potentially be overcome. To better understand the stability of solid electrolytes when in contact with alkali metals and the reactions that occur, here we consider the deposition of thin (~10 nm) alkali metal films onto solid electrolyte surfaces, where the metal is thin enough that X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy can probe the buried electrode–electrolyte interface. We highlight the importance of <em>in situ</em> alkali metal deposition by assessing the contaminant species that are present after glovebox handling and the use of ‘inert’ transfer devices. Consequently, we compare and contrast three available methods for <em>in situ</em> alkali-metal deposition; Li sputter deposition, Li evaporation, and Li plating induced by e<small><sup>?</sup></small> flood-gun irradiation. Studies on both a sulphide solid electrolyte (Li<small><sub>6</sub></small>PS<small><sub>5</sub></small>Cl), and a single-layer graphene probe surface reveal that the more energetic Li deposition methods, such as sputtering, can induce surface damage and interfacial mixing that are not seen with thermal evaporation. This indicates that the appropriate selection of the Li deposition method for <em>in situ</em> studies is required to observe representative behaviour, and the results of previous studies involving energetic deposition may warrant further evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faraday Discussions\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\" 267-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2022/fd/d1fd00118c?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faraday Discussions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/fd/d1fd00118c\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faraday Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/fd/d1fd00118c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电化学储能装置中关键的电荷转移过程发生在电极-电解质界面,这些界面通常是埋藏的,这使得获取其界面化学具有挑战性。就锂离子电池而言,金属锂电极有望提高能量和功率密度,当与固体电解质结合使用时,有机液体电解质中枝晶形成的不利安全影响可能会被克服。为了更好地了解固体电解质与碱金属接触时的稳定性以及发生的反应,我们考虑在固体电解质表面沉积薄(~10 nm)的碱金属薄膜,其中金属足够薄,x射线光电子能谱可以探测埋藏的电极-电解质界面。我们通过评估手套箱处理和使用“惰性”转移装置后存在的污染物种类,强调原位碱金属沉积的重要性。因此,我们比较和对比了三种可用的原位碱金属沉积方法;Li溅射沉积、Li蒸发和e?flood-gun辐照。对硫化物固体电解质(Li6PS5Cl)和单层石墨烯探针表面的研究表明,更高能的锂沉积方法,如溅射,可以引起表面损伤和界面混合,这是热蒸发所没有的。这表明,原位研究需要适当选择锂沉积方法来观察具有代表性的行为,并且先前涉及高能沉积的研究结果可能值得进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gently does it!: in situ preparation of alkali metal–solid electrolyte interfaces for photoelectron spectroscopy†

Gently does it!: in situ preparation of alkali metal–solid electrolyte interfaces for photoelectron spectroscopy†

The key charge transfer processes in electrochemical energy storage devices occur at electrode–electrolyte interfaces, which are typically buried, making it challenging to access their interfacial chemistry. In the case of Li-ion batteries, metallic Li electrodes hold promise for increasing energy and power densities and, when used in conjunction with solid electrolytes, the adverse safety implications associated with dendrite formation in organic liquid electrolytes can potentially be overcome. To better understand the stability of solid electrolytes when in contact with alkali metals and the reactions that occur, here we consider the deposition of thin (~10 nm) alkali metal films onto solid electrolyte surfaces, where the metal is thin enough that X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy can probe the buried electrode–electrolyte interface. We highlight the importance of in situ alkali metal deposition by assessing the contaminant species that are present after glovebox handling and the use of ‘inert’ transfer devices. Consequently, we compare and contrast three available methods for in situ alkali-metal deposition; Li sputter deposition, Li evaporation, and Li plating induced by e? flood-gun irradiation. Studies on both a sulphide solid electrolyte (Li6PS5Cl), and a single-layer graphene probe surface reveal that the more energetic Li deposition methods, such as sputtering, can induce surface damage and interfacial mixing that are not seen with thermal evaporation. This indicates that the appropriate selection of the Li deposition method for in situ studies is required to observe representative behaviour, and the results of previous studies involving energetic deposition may warrant further evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Faraday Discussions
Faraday Discussions 化学-物理化学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
259
期刊介绍: Discussion summary and research papers from discussion meetings that focus on rapidly developing areas of physical chemistry and its interfaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信