Naomi Fukuda, Krupa Gandhi, Eunjung Lim, Anne Leake
{"title":"亚太岛民糖尿病困扰量表的验证。","authors":"Naomi Fukuda, Krupa Gandhi, Eunjung Lim, Anne Leake","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes distress (DD) generally refers to the emotional and cognitive stress caused by the daily management of diabetes. The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)-17 is a 17-item instrument that is frequently used to screen DD and the Fisher's DDS2, developed by Fisher, et al, is a two-item instrument to quickly identify DD. However, these scales have been validated in Caucasian populations but not in Asian Pacific Islander (API) populations. This study aimed to 1) evaluate content validity of the DDS17 by evaluating correlation with hemoglobin A1c and 2) identify two items to develop a brief screening tool, DDS2, for an API population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 443 patients at a diabetes center in Hawai'i. On their initial visit, patients filled out the DDS17 as a part of the standard of care. The DDS17 showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). The two items of our DDS2 with the highest phi coefficient (0.59 each) to the total DDS17 subscales were selected from the interpersonal distress and the emotional burden subscales. The phi coefficient (0.74) of our DDS2 was higher than that of the Fisher's DDS2 (0.60). All DDS items showed positive correlation with hemoglobin A1c (DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher's DDS2: r = 0.21, respectively). Therefore, these scales can be used to measure DD in an API population and the positive correlation suggests that addressing DD may improve glycemic control and vice versa. Clinicians with limited time may consider using our DDS2 rather than DDS17 to quickly screen the API population for DD.</p>","PeriodicalId":73197,"journal":{"name":"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health","volume":"78 1","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333958/pdf/hjmph7801_0003.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Diabetes Distress Scale in an Asian Pacific Islander Population.\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Fukuda, Krupa Gandhi, Eunjung Lim, Anne Leake\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetes distress (DD) generally refers to the emotional and cognitive stress caused by the daily management of diabetes. The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)-17 is a 17-item instrument that is frequently used to screen DD and the Fisher's DDS2, developed by Fisher, et al, is a two-item instrument to quickly identify DD. However, these scales have been validated in Caucasian populations but not in Asian Pacific Islander (API) populations. This study aimed to 1) evaluate content validity of the DDS17 by evaluating correlation with hemoglobin A1c and 2) identify two items to develop a brief screening tool, DDS2, for an API population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 443 patients at a diabetes center in Hawai'i. On their initial visit, patients filled out the DDS17 as a part of the standard of care. The DDS17 showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). The two items of our DDS2 with the highest phi coefficient (0.59 each) to the total DDS17 subscales were selected from the interpersonal distress and the emotional burden subscales. The phi coefficient (0.74) of our DDS2 was higher than that of the Fisher's DDS2 (0.60). All DDS items showed positive correlation with hemoglobin A1c (DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher's DDS2: r = 0.21, respectively). Therefore, these scales can be used to measure DD in an API population and the positive correlation suggests that addressing DD may improve glycemic control and vice versa. Clinicians with limited time may consider using our DDS2 rather than DDS17 to quickly screen the API population for DD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"3-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333958/pdf/hjmph7801_0003.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
糖尿病窘迫(Diabetes distress, DD)一般是指日常糖尿病管理过程中产生的情绪和认知压力。糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)-17是一个17项的工具,经常用于筛查DD, Fisher等人开发的Fisher's DDS2是一个两项的工具,用于快速识别DD。然而,这些量表已在高加索人群中得到验证,但未在亚太岛民(API)人群中得到验证。本研究旨在1)通过评估DDS17与血红蛋白A1c的相关性来评估DDS17的含量效度;2)确定两个项目来开发一种用于API人群的简短筛选工具DDS2。我们对夏威夷一家糖尿病中心的443名患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。在初次就诊时,患者填写了DDS17,作为标准护理的一部分。DDS17具有较高的信度(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94)。从人际困扰和情绪负担两个分量表中,选择我们的DDS2中与总DDS17分量表的phi系数最高的两个项目,各为0.59。我们的DDS2的phi系数(0.74)高于Fisher的DDS2(0.60)。所有DDS项与血红蛋白A1c呈正相关(DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher’s DDS2: r = 0.21)。因此,这些量表可用于测量API人群的DD,正相关表明解决DD可能改善血糖控制,反之亦然。时间有限的临床医生可以考虑使用我们的DDS2而不是DDS17来快速筛查API人群的DD。
Validation of the Diabetes Distress Scale in an Asian Pacific Islander Population.
Diabetes distress (DD) generally refers to the emotional and cognitive stress caused by the daily management of diabetes. The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)-17 is a 17-item instrument that is frequently used to screen DD and the Fisher's DDS2, developed by Fisher, et al, is a two-item instrument to quickly identify DD. However, these scales have been validated in Caucasian populations but not in Asian Pacific Islander (API) populations. This study aimed to 1) evaluate content validity of the DDS17 by evaluating correlation with hemoglobin A1c and 2) identify two items to develop a brief screening tool, DDS2, for an API population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 443 patients at a diabetes center in Hawai'i. On their initial visit, patients filled out the DDS17 as a part of the standard of care. The DDS17 showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). The two items of our DDS2 with the highest phi coefficient (0.59 each) to the total DDS17 subscales were selected from the interpersonal distress and the emotional burden subscales. The phi coefficient (0.74) of our DDS2 was higher than that of the Fisher's DDS2 (0.60). All DDS items showed positive correlation with hemoglobin A1c (DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher's DDS2: r = 0.21, respectively). Therefore, these scales can be used to measure DD in an API population and the positive correlation suggests that addressing DD may improve glycemic control and vice versa. Clinicians with limited time may consider using our DDS2 rather than DDS17 to quickly screen the API population for DD.