[使用1.5 T MR扫描仪对初级运动皮层进行连续实时fMRI生物反馈的经验]。

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
M Ye Mel'nikov, A A Savelov, M B Shtark, M A Pokrovskiy, E D Petrovskiy, L I Kozlova, K G Mazhirina, D D Bezmaternikh
{"title":"[使用1.5 T MR扫描仪对初级运动皮层进行连续实时fMRI生物反馈的经验]。","authors":"M Ye Mel'nikov,&nbsp;A A Savelov,&nbsp;M B Shtark,&nbsp;M A Pokrovskiy,&nbsp;E D Petrovskiy,&nbsp;L I Kozlova,&nbsp;K G Mazhirina,&nbsp;D D Bezmaternikh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neurofeedback based on the motor areas fMRI signal may be a promising treatment for improving motor impairment in post-stroke conditions and Parkinson's disease. In the majority of the studies has been conducted using the 3 T MR machines, and the region of interest has been placed to the secondary motor areas. The current study attempted to perform an fMRI neurofeeback based on response of the right hand projection locus within primary motor cortex utilizing the 1.5 T MR scanner and using the optimal parameters for the named magnetic field strength. The subjects were 16 healthy participants who underwent a 30-minute imaging session comprised 1) individual func- tional localization of the region of interest (using the hand clinging task) and attempts to control its activity with 2) motor imagery and 3) any cognitive strategy chosen by participant. In both self-regulation conditions subjects activated G. precentralis, G. cinguli anterior, G. frontalis superior, G. parietalis inferior, and 6-th Brodman area. Activation maps for these two tasks didn't differ one from another significantly, and the involved area had only a few overlays with the region of interest map which signifies that training was unsucessful. The limitations of the study and factors influenc- ing the biofeedback efficacy negatively are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49337,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni I P Pavlova","volume":"67 1","pages":"83-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Experience of the Continuous Real Time fMRI Biofeedback of the Primary Motor Cortex Using a 1.5 T MR Scanner].\",\"authors\":\"M Ye Mel'nikov,&nbsp;A A Savelov,&nbsp;M B Shtark,&nbsp;M A Pokrovskiy,&nbsp;E D Petrovskiy,&nbsp;L I Kozlova,&nbsp;K G Mazhirina,&nbsp;D D Bezmaternikh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The neurofeedback based on the motor areas fMRI signal may be a promising treatment for improving motor impairment in post-stroke conditions and Parkinson's disease. In the majority of the studies has been conducted using the 3 T MR machines, and the region of interest has been placed to the secondary motor areas. The current study attempted to perform an fMRI neurofeeback based on response of the right hand projection locus within primary motor cortex utilizing the 1.5 T MR scanner and using the optimal parameters for the named magnetic field strength. The subjects were 16 healthy participants who underwent a 30-minute imaging session comprised 1) individual func- tional localization of the region of interest (using the hand clinging task) and attempts to control its activity with 2) motor imagery and 3) any cognitive strategy chosen by participant. In both self-regulation conditions subjects activated G. precentralis, G. cinguli anterior, G. frontalis superior, G. parietalis inferior, and 6-th Brodman area. Activation maps for these two tasks didn't differ one from another significantly, and the involved area had only a few overlays with the region of interest map which signifies that training was unsucessful. The limitations of the study and factors influenc- ing the biofeedback efficacy negatively are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni I P Pavlova\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"83-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni I P Pavlova\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni I P Pavlova","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于运动区fMRI信号的神经反馈可能是改善脑卒中后运动障碍和帕金森病的一种有希望的治疗方法。在大多数研究中,使用3t MR机器进行,感兴趣的区域被放置在次级运动区域。本研究试图利用1.5 T MR扫描仪,利用命名磁场强度的最佳参数,对初级运动皮层内右手投射轨迹的反应进行fMRI神经反馈。研究对象是16名健康的参与者,他们接受了30分钟的成像,包括1)个人感兴趣区域的功能定位(使用手抓任务),并尝试用运动图像和3)参与者选择的任何认知策略来控制其活动。在这两种自我调节条件下,受试者激活中央前区、扣带回前区、额上区、顶叶下区和第6 Brodman区。这两个任务的激活图差异不明显,涉及的区域与感兴趣区域图只有很少的重叠,这表明训练不成功。讨论了本研究的局限性和对生物反馈效果产生负面影响的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Experience of the Continuous Real Time fMRI Biofeedback of the Primary Motor Cortex Using a 1.5 T MR Scanner].

The neurofeedback based on the motor areas fMRI signal may be a promising treatment for improving motor impairment in post-stroke conditions and Parkinson's disease. In the majority of the studies has been conducted using the 3 T MR machines, and the region of interest has been placed to the secondary motor areas. The current study attempted to perform an fMRI neurofeeback based on response of the right hand projection locus within primary motor cortex utilizing the 1.5 T MR scanner and using the optimal parameters for the named magnetic field strength. The subjects were 16 healthy participants who underwent a 30-minute imaging session comprised 1) individual func- tional localization of the region of interest (using the hand clinging task) and attempts to control its activity with 2) motor imagery and 3) any cognitive strategy chosen by participant. In both self-regulation conditions subjects activated G. precentralis, G. cinguli anterior, G. frontalis superior, G. parietalis inferior, and 6-th Brodman area. Activation maps for these two tasks didn't differ one from another significantly, and the involved area had only a few overlays with the region of interest map which signifies that training was unsucessful. The limitations of the study and factors influenc- ing the biofeedback efficacy negatively are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
9
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信