基于语料库的越南语“分类器”con和cái分析。

Mon-Khmer studies Pub Date : 2008-01-01
Giang Pham, Kathryn Kohnert
{"title":"基于语料库的越南语“分类器”con和cái分析。","authors":"Giang Pham,&nbsp;Kathryn Kohnert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to examine the use of two common Vietnamese 'classifiers,' <i>con</i> (animacy) and <i>cái</i> (inanimacy) using language corpora data of over one million words. This information may contribute to an ongoing debate of whether Vietnamese 'classifiers' are a distinct word class or a subclass of nouns. Frequency and distributions were calculated using computer software. Lexical-semantic functions were manually analyzed for each occurrence. Findings indicated that <i>con</i> and <i>cái</i> were highly frequent and distributed across text genres. However, neither form consistently demonstrated a classifying function: <i>con</i> indicated animacy less than 24% of the time, and <i>cái</i> indicated inanimacy less than 65% of the time. Corpus-based analysis is a useful tool to make comparisons between prototypical and 'real-life' language use. If Vietnamese 'classifiers' are not consistently used as such, considering this group of words a subclass of nouns rather than a distinct word class may be more parsimonious.</p>","PeriodicalId":92561,"journal":{"name":"Mon-Khmer studies","volume":"38 ","pages":"161-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326581/pdf/nihms957083.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A corpus-based analysis of Vietnamese 'classifiers' <i>con</i> and <i>cái</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Giang Pham,&nbsp;Kathryn Kohnert\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to examine the use of two common Vietnamese 'classifiers,' <i>con</i> (animacy) and <i>cái</i> (inanimacy) using language corpora data of over one million words. This information may contribute to an ongoing debate of whether Vietnamese 'classifiers' are a distinct word class or a subclass of nouns. Frequency and distributions were calculated using computer software. Lexical-semantic functions were manually analyzed for each occurrence. Findings indicated that <i>con</i> and <i>cái</i> were highly frequent and distributed across text genres. However, neither form consistently demonstrated a classifying function: <i>con</i> indicated animacy less than 24% of the time, and <i>cái</i> indicated inanimacy less than 65% of the time. Corpus-based analysis is a useful tool to make comparisons between prototypical and 'real-life' language use. If Vietnamese 'classifiers' are not consistently used as such, considering this group of words a subclass of nouns rather than a distinct word class may be more parsimonious.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mon-Khmer studies\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"161-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326581/pdf/nihms957083.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mon-Khmer studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mon-Khmer studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是使用超过一百万字的语料库数据来检查两种常见的越南语“分类器”con (animacy)和cái (inanimacy)的使用情况。这一信息可能有助于越南语“分类词”是一个独特的词类还是名词的子类的持续辩论。使用计算机软件计算频率和分布。每次出现的词汇-语义功能都是手工分析的。调查结果表明,con和cái的出现频率很高,并且分布在不同的文本类型中。然而,这两种形式都不一致地表现出分类功能:con表示有生命的时间少于24%,cái表示无生命的时间少于65%。基于语料库的分析是比较原型和“现实生活”语言使用的有用工具。如果越南语的“分类词”没有被一贯地这样使用,那么将这组词视为名词的子类而不是一个独特的词类可能会更简洁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A corpus-based analysis of Vietnamese 'classifiers' con and cái.

The purpose of this study is to examine the use of two common Vietnamese 'classifiers,' con (animacy) and cái (inanimacy) using language corpora data of over one million words. This information may contribute to an ongoing debate of whether Vietnamese 'classifiers' are a distinct word class or a subclass of nouns. Frequency and distributions were calculated using computer software. Lexical-semantic functions were manually analyzed for each occurrence. Findings indicated that con and cái were highly frequent and distributed across text genres. However, neither form consistently demonstrated a classifying function: con indicated animacy less than 24% of the time, and cái indicated inanimacy less than 65% of the time. Corpus-based analysis is a useful tool to make comparisons between prototypical and 'real-life' language use. If Vietnamese 'classifiers' are not consistently used as such, considering this group of words a subclass of nouns rather than a distinct word class may be more parsimonious.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信