二甲双胍使用与肾癌生存结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Madhur Nayan, Nahid Punjani, David N Juurlink, Antonio Finelli, Peter C Austin, Girish S Kulkarni, Elizabeth Uleryk, Robert J Hamilton
{"title":"二甲双胍使用与肾癌生存结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Madhur Nayan,&nbsp;Nahid Punjani,&nbsp;David N Juurlink,&nbsp;Antonio Finelli,&nbsp;Peter C Austin,&nbsp;Girish S Kulkarni,&nbsp;Elizabeth Uleryk,&nbsp;Robert J Hamilton","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000000512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Metformin has been associated with improved survival outcomes in various malignancies. However, studies in kidney cancer are conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between metformin and kidney cancer survival.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2017 to identify studies evaluating the association between metformin use and kidney cancer survival outcomes. We evaluated risk of bias with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free, progression-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival using random effects models, and explored heterogeneity with metaregression. We evaluated publication bias through Begg's and Egger's tests, and the trim and fill procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria, collectively involving 7426 patients. Five studies were at low risk of bias. The direction of association for metformin use was toward benefit for recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-2.74), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.07), cancer-specific (pooled HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.48-1.09), and overall survival (pooled HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.50-1.09), though none reached statistical significance. Metaregression found no study-level characteristic to be associated with the effect size, and there was no strong evidence of publication bias for any outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no evidence of a statistically significant association between metformin use and any survival outcome in kidney cancer. We discuss the potential for bias in chemoprevention studies and provide recommendations to reduce bias in future studies evaluating metformin in kidney cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":501816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"275-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000512","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metformin Use and Kidney Cancer Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Madhur Nayan,&nbsp;Nahid Punjani,&nbsp;David N Juurlink,&nbsp;Antonio Finelli,&nbsp;Peter C Austin,&nbsp;Girish S Kulkarni,&nbsp;Elizabeth Uleryk,&nbsp;Robert J Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COC.0000000000000512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Metformin has been associated with improved survival outcomes in various malignancies. However, studies in kidney cancer are conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between metformin and kidney cancer survival.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2017 to identify studies evaluating the association between metformin use and kidney cancer survival outcomes. We evaluated risk of bias with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free, progression-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival using random effects models, and explored heterogeneity with metaregression. We evaluated publication bias through Begg's and Egger's tests, and the trim and fill procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria, collectively involving 7426 patients. Five studies were at low risk of bias. The direction of association for metformin use was toward benefit for recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-2.74), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.07), cancer-specific (pooled HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.48-1.09), and overall survival (pooled HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.50-1.09), though none reached statistical significance. Metaregression found no study-level characteristic to be associated with the effect size, and there was no strong evidence of publication bias for any outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no evidence of a statistically significant association between metformin use and any survival outcome in kidney cancer. We discuss the potential for bias in chemoprevention studies and provide recommendations to reduce bias in future studies evaluating metformin in kidney cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"275-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000512\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:二甲双胍与改善各种恶性肿瘤的生存结果相关。然而,关于肾癌的研究是相互矛盾的。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估二甲双胍与肾癌生存之间的关系。材料和方法:我们检索了Medline和EMBASE数据库,从成立到2017年6月,以确定评估二甲双胍使用与肾癌生存结局之间关系的研究。我们用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应模型汇总了无复发、无进展、癌症特异性和总生存率的风险比(hr),并通过meta回归探讨了异质性。我们通过Begg's和Egger's检验以及修剪和填充程序来评估发表偏倚。结果:我们确定了9项符合纳入标准的研究,共涉及7426例患者。5项研究的偏倚风险较低。二甲双胍使用的相关方向是有利于无复发生存(HR, 0.99;95%可信区间[CI], 0.36-2.74),无进展生存期(合并HR, 0.84;95% CI, 0.66-1.07),癌症特异性(合并HR, 0.72;95% CI, 0.48-1.09)和总生存率(合并HR, 0.73;95% CI, 0.50-1.09),但没有达到统计学意义。回归分析没有发现与效应大小相关的研究水平特征,也没有强有力的证据表明任何结果存在发表偏倚。结论:在肾癌患者中,二甲双胍的使用与任何生存结果之间没有统计学上显著的关联。我们讨论了化学预防研究中可能存在的偏倚,并提出了在未来评估二甲双胍治疗肾癌的研究中减少偏倚的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metformin Use and Kidney Cancer Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: Metformin has been associated with improved survival outcomes in various malignancies. However, studies in kidney cancer are conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between metformin and kidney cancer survival.

Materials and methods: We searched Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2017 to identify studies evaluating the association between metformin use and kidney cancer survival outcomes. We evaluated risk of bias with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free, progression-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival using random effects models, and explored heterogeneity with metaregression. We evaluated publication bias through Begg's and Egger's tests, and the trim and fill procedure.

Results: We identified 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria, collectively involving 7426 patients. Five studies were at low risk of bias. The direction of association for metformin use was toward benefit for recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-2.74), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.07), cancer-specific (pooled HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.48-1.09), and overall survival (pooled HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.50-1.09), though none reached statistical significance. Metaregression found no study-level characteristic to be associated with the effect size, and there was no strong evidence of publication bias for any outcome.

Conclusions: There is no evidence of a statistically significant association between metformin use and any survival outcome in kidney cancer. We discuss the potential for bias in chemoprevention studies and provide recommendations to reduce bias in future studies evaluating metformin in kidney cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信