[预处理方法、培养基类型、包膜工艺、保存方法对MALDI-TOF MS鉴定精度的影响]。

Hiroki Hanaiwa, Keisuke Miyako, Taeko Narita, Kyohei Kato, Kazuhiro Shinto, Yumiko Funashima, Kenichi Sato, Tetsuhiro Harada, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura
{"title":"[预处理方法、培养基类型、包膜工艺、保存方法对MALDI-TOF MS鉴定精度的影响]。","authors":"Hiroki Hanaiwa,&nbsp;Keisuke Miyako,&nbsp;Taeko Narita,&nbsp;Kyohei Kato,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Shinto,&nbsp;Yumiko Funashima,&nbsp;Kenichi Sato,&nbsp;Tetsuhiro Harada,&nbsp;Zenzo Nagasawa,&nbsp;Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF MS, there are many reports of usefulness concerning direct identification from blood culture and identification of bacteria which cannot be identified with automatic analysis equipment. On the other hand, there are very few studies that investigate how various conditions influence on identification accuracy, such as the type of medium used for bacterial isolation and pure culture, the pretreatment methods, the difference in coating technique, and preservation methods. Therefore, we examined 10 strains of 2 drug-resistant bacteria species and 9 strains of 1 unnormal bacterium species. As a result, no significant differences were found in accuracy of identifying all strains of the target bacteria incubated for 24 hours and changing the types of medium, the pretreatment methods, and the coating techniques. In particular, methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> showed little change in the score value and the mass spectrum that assayed every 24 hours during the preservation period in all of the medium. In the case of <i>Vibrio vulnificus</i>, however, identification accuracy was decreased by the specific medium and storage conditions. It is suggested as this factor that the growth state of bacteria may have influenced the identification accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"28 2","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[On the identification accuracy of MALDI-TOF MS influence of pretreatment methods, types of medium, coating skills, and preservation methods].\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Hanaiwa,&nbsp;Keisuke Miyako,&nbsp;Taeko Narita,&nbsp;Kyohei Kato,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Shinto,&nbsp;Yumiko Funashima,&nbsp;Kenichi Sato,&nbsp;Tetsuhiro Harada,&nbsp;Zenzo Nagasawa,&nbsp;Tsukuru Umemura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF MS, there are many reports of usefulness concerning direct identification from blood culture and identification of bacteria which cannot be identified with automatic analysis equipment. On the other hand, there are very few studies that investigate how various conditions influence on identification accuracy, such as the type of medium used for bacterial isolation and pure culture, the pretreatment methods, the difference in coating technique, and preservation methods. Therefore, we examined 10 strains of 2 drug-resistant bacteria species and 9 strains of 1 unnormal bacterium species. As a result, no significant differences were found in accuracy of identifying all strains of the target bacteria incubated for 24 hours and changing the types of medium, the pretreatment methods, and the coating techniques. In particular, methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> showed little change in the score value and the mass spectrum that assayed every 24 hours during the preservation period in all of the medium. In the case of <i>Vibrio vulnificus</i>, however, identification accuracy was decreased by the specific medium and storage conditions. It is suggested as this factor that the growth state of bacteria may have influenced the identification accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"59-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在MALDI-TOF质谱法的细菌鉴定中,有许多关于直接从血液培养物中鉴定细菌和鉴定自动分析设备无法鉴定的细菌的报道。另一方面,对于细菌分离和纯培养所用的培养基类型、预处理方法、包膜技术的差异、保存方法等各种条件对鉴定准确性的影响研究甚少。因此,我们检测了2种耐药菌的10株和1种异常菌的9株。结果发现,不同培养基类型、预处理方法和包被技术对培养24小时的目标菌的所有菌株的鉴定准确性没有显著差异。特别是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠杆菌在所有培养基中保存期间的评分值和每24小时检测一次的质谱变化不大。然而,在创伤弧菌的情况下,鉴定的准确性因特定的培养基和储存条件而降低。因此,细菌的生长状态可能会影响鉴定的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[On the identification accuracy of MALDI-TOF MS influence of pretreatment methods, types of medium, coating skills, and preservation methods].

In bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF MS, there are many reports of usefulness concerning direct identification from blood culture and identification of bacteria which cannot be identified with automatic analysis equipment. On the other hand, there are very few studies that investigate how various conditions influence on identification accuracy, such as the type of medium used for bacterial isolation and pure culture, the pretreatment methods, the difference in coating technique, and preservation methods. Therefore, we examined 10 strains of 2 drug-resistant bacteria species and 9 strains of 1 unnormal bacterium species. As a result, no significant differences were found in accuracy of identifying all strains of the target bacteria incubated for 24 hours and changing the types of medium, the pretreatment methods, and the coating techniques. In particular, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli showed little change in the score value and the mass spectrum that assayed every 24 hours during the preservation period in all of the medium. In the case of Vibrio vulnificus, however, identification accuracy was decreased by the specific medium and storage conditions. It is suggested as this factor that the growth state of bacteria may have influenced the identification accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信