{"title":"[长效抗精神病药物注射应被视为精神分裂症患者的基本治疗选择吗?]。","authors":"Koji Matsuo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this article (and the corresponding symposium) was to assume an \"oppo- sition\" stance and argue against the presumed usefulness of long-acting injections (LAI) for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Here, LAI demonstrated limited patient applica- bility and were found to be used infrequently in Japan, with insufficient evidence to their effi- cacy suggesting that LAI would be more appropriate playing a supplementary role in the pharmacotherapy guidelines for schizophrenia. Additionally, any potential benefits of LAI have yet to be fully realized in Japan due to the fact that 80% of patients treated with LAI for schizophrenia are also prescribed antipsychotics orally, and a hesitance towards LAI by psy- chiatrists is likely to be reflected in their limited usage nationwide, an attitude which may present an ethical problem in terms of just principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":21638,"journal":{"name":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","volume":"118 8","pages":"598-606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Should Long-acting Antipsychotic Injection be Considered an Essential Treatment Option for Patients with Schizophrenia?].\",\"authors\":\"Koji Matsuo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this article (and the corresponding symposium) was to assume an \\\"oppo- sition\\\" stance and argue against the presumed usefulness of long-acting injections (LAI) for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Here, LAI demonstrated limited patient applica- bility and were found to be used infrequently in Japan, with insufficient evidence to their effi- cacy suggesting that LAI would be more appropriate playing a supplementary role in the pharmacotherapy guidelines for schizophrenia. Additionally, any potential benefits of LAI have yet to be fully realized in Japan due to the fact that 80% of patients treated with LAI for schizophrenia are also prescribed antipsychotics orally, and a hesitance towards LAI by psy- chiatrists is likely to be reflected in their limited usage nationwide, an attitude which may present an ethical problem in terms of just principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica\",\"volume\":\"118 8\",\"pages\":\"598-606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Should Long-acting Antipsychotic Injection be Considered an Essential Treatment Option for Patients with Schizophrenia?].
The objective of this article (and the corresponding symposium) was to assume an "oppo- sition" stance and argue against the presumed usefulness of long-acting injections (LAI) for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Here, LAI demonstrated limited patient applica- bility and were found to be used infrequently in Japan, with insufficient evidence to their effi- cacy suggesting that LAI would be more appropriate playing a supplementary role in the pharmacotherapy guidelines for schizophrenia. Additionally, any potential benefits of LAI have yet to be fully realized in Japan due to the fact that 80% of patients treated with LAI for schizophrenia are also prescribed antipsychotics orally, and a hesitance towards LAI by psy- chiatrists is likely to be reflected in their limited usage nationwide, an attitude which may present an ethical problem in terms of just principles.