[重新考虑抑郁症的森田疗法]。

Kei Nakamura
{"title":"[重新考虑抑郁症的森田疗法]。","authors":"Kei Nakamura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author outlined Morita therapy-based living-guidance (yojo) and inpatient treatment for depressed patients. He further discussed commonalities and differences between Morita therapy and \"the third generation\" of cognitive-behavioral therapies, such as behavioral activa- tion (BA) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT). Both Morita therapy and BA share at least a common view that it is effective to activate patients' constructive behavior at a certain point in depression treatment. In a corresponding manner, as MBCT emphasizes the \"being\" mode and Morita therapy, \"arugamama, or being as is,\" they both state that the turn- ing point to break the vicious cycle (or \"doing\" mode) is accepting thoughts and emotions as they are. However, Morita therapists, compared with BA therapists, seem to pay more attention to the necessity of resting and appropriate timing for introducing behavioral activation. MBCT has patients concentrate their attention on their own aspirations and bodily sensations (medita- tion), while in Morita therapy, their attentions are naturally diverted through the practice of daily life. Besides the differences of cultural backgrounds, there seem to be differences in depression models between Morita therapy and \"the third generation\" of CBT. In the BA model, the cause of depression lies in a lack of positive reinforcement, and negative reinforcement resulting from the avoidance of the experience of discomfort. The cognitive theory of depression places the model of the vicious cycle among the elements of cognition, emotion, and behavior. In this regard, MBCT shares a common assumption regarding the pathogenesis of depression with conventional cognitive therapy. As BA and MBCT are based on psychological models of depression, both treatments have been primarily practiced by clinical psychologists. On the other hand, medical doctors mainly offer a psychotherapeutic approach with medication treat- ments for depressive patients in Japan. In this context, the practice of treating depression is based primarily on medical models of endogenous depression. This is also true of Morita ther- apy, but in a broad sense. While those who follow medical models in a narrow sense try to identify the cause of illness and then to remove it, Morita therapists pay more attention to the recovery process rather than the pathogeneses of depression and attempt to promote patients' natural healing-power. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to refer to the model used in Morita therapy as \"a resilience model\".</p>","PeriodicalId":21638,"journal":{"name":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","volume":"118 12","pages":"931-937"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reconsidering Morita Therapy for Depression].\",\"authors\":\"Kei Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The author outlined Morita therapy-based living-guidance (yojo) and inpatient treatment for depressed patients. He further discussed commonalities and differences between Morita therapy and \\\"the third generation\\\" of cognitive-behavioral therapies, such as behavioral activa- tion (BA) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT). Both Morita therapy and BA share at least a common view that it is effective to activate patients' constructive behavior at a certain point in depression treatment. In a corresponding manner, as MBCT emphasizes the \\\"being\\\" mode and Morita therapy, \\\"arugamama, or being as is,\\\" they both state that the turn- ing point to break the vicious cycle (or \\\"doing\\\" mode) is accepting thoughts and emotions as they are. However, Morita therapists, compared with BA therapists, seem to pay more attention to the necessity of resting and appropriate timing for introducing behavioral activation. MBCT has patients concentrate their attention on their own aspirations and bodily sensations (medita- tion), while in Morita therapy, their attentions are naturally diverted through the practice of daily life. Besides the differences of cultural backgrounds, there seem to be differences in depression models between Morita therapy and \\\"the third generation\\\" of CBT. In the BA model, the cause of depression lies in a lack of positive reinforcement, and negative reinforcement resulting from the avoidance of the experience of discomfort. The cognitive theory of depression places the model of the vicious cycle among the elements of cognition, emotion, and behavior. In this regard, MBCT shares a common assumption regarding the pathogenesis of depression with conventional cognitive therapy. As BA and MBCT are based on psychological models of depression, both treatments have been primarily practiced by clinical psychologists. On the other hand, medical doctors mainly offer a psychotherapeutic approach with medication treat- ments for depressive patients in Japan. In this context, the practice of treating depression is based primarily on medical models of endogenous depression. This is also true of Morita ther- apy, but in a broad sense. While those who follow medical models in a narrow sense try to identify the cause of illness and then to remove it, Morita therapists pay more attention to the recovery process rather than the pathogeneses of depression and attempt to promote patients' natural healing-power. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to refer to the model used in Morita therapy as \\\"a resilience model\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica\",\"volume\":\"118 12\",\"pages\":\"931-937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者概述了基于森田疗法的生活指导(yojo)和抑郁症患者的住院治疗。他进一步讨论了森田疗法与“第三代”认知行为疗法(如行为激活疗法(BA)和基于正念的认知疗法(MBCT))之间的共性和差异。森田疗法和BA至少有一个共同的观点,即在抑郁症治疗的某一点上激活患者的建设性行为是有效的。相应地,MBCT强调的是“存在”模式,而森田疗法强调的是“arugamama”或“如其所是”,它们都指出,打破恶性循环(或“做”模式)的转折点是接受思想和情感的本来样子。然而,与BA治疗师相比,Morita治疗师似乎更注重休息的必要性和引入行为激活的适当时机。MBCT让患者将注意力集中在自己的愿望和身体感觉上(冥想),而在森田疗法中,他们的注意力自然地通过日常生活的实践转移。除了文化背景的差异外,森田疗法与“第三代”CBT的抑郁模式似乎也存在差异。在BA模型中,抑郁的原因在于缺乏正强化,而负强化则是由于回避不适的体验而导致的。抑郁症的认知理论将恶性循环的模型置于认知、情绪和行为的元素之间。在这方面,MBCT与传统认知疗法在抑郁症发病机制上有一个共同的假设。由于BA和MBCT是基于抑郁症的心理学模型,这两种治疗方法主要由临床心理学家实践。另一方面,在日本,医生主要通过药物治疗对抑郁症患者进行心理治疗。在这种情况下,治疗抑郁症的实践主要是基于内源性抑郁症的医学模型。森田疗法也是如此,但从广义上讲。那些遵循狭义医学模式的人试图找出疾病的原因,然后消除它,而森田治疗师更关注康复过程,而不是抑郁症的致病机制,并试图促进患者的自然治愈能力。因此,将森田疗法中使用的模型称为“弹性模型”可能更为合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Reconsidering Morita Therapy for Depression].

The author outlined Morita therapy-based living-guidance (yojo) and inpatient treatment for depressed patients. He further discussed commonalities and differences between Morita therapy and "the third generation" of cognitive-behavioral therapies, such as behavioral activa- tion (BA) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT). Both Morita therapy and BA share at least a common view that it is effective to activate patients' constructive behavior at a certain point in depression treatment. In a corresponding manner, as MBCT emphasizes the "being" mode and Morita therapy, "arugamama, or being as is," they both state that the turn- ing point to break the vicious cycle (or "doing" mode) is accepting thoughts and emotions as they are. However, Morita therapists, compared with BA therapists, seem to pay more attention to the necessity of resting and appropriate timing for introducing behavioral activation. MBCT has patients concentrate their attention on their own aspirations and bodily sensations (medita- tion), while in Morita therapy, their attentions are naturally diverted through the practice of daily life. Besides the differences of cultural backgrounds, there seem to be differences in depression models between Morita therapy and "the third generation" of CBT. In the BA model, the cause of depression lies in a lack of positive reinforcement, and negative reinforcement resulting from the avoidance of the experience of discomfort. The cognitive theory of depression places the model of the vicious cycle among the elements of cognition, emotion, and behavior. In this regard, MBCT shares a common assumption regarding the pathogenesis of depression with conventional cognitive therapy. As BA and MBCT are based on psychological models of depression, both treatments have been primarily practiced by clinical psychologists. On the other hand, medical doctors mainly offer a psychotherapeutic approach with medication treat- ments for depressive patients in Japan. In this context, the practice of treating depression is based primarily on medical models of endogenous depression. This is also true of Morita ther- apy, but in a broad sense. While those who follow medical models in a narrow sense try to identify the cause of illness and then to remove it, Morita therapists pay more attention to the recovery process rather than the pathogeneses of depression and attempt to promote patients' natural healing-power. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to refer to the model used in Morita therapy as "a resilience model".

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信