[切尔诺贝利灾难的后果-距离30年]。

L M Rozhdestvensky
{"title":"[切尔诺贝利灾难的后果-距离30年]。","authors":"L M Rozhdestvensky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are 2 most important questions regarding studies of the Chernobyl disaster: to what degree the opportunities to decrease injuries of the people affected by the disaster were realized and how the study of the con- sequences of the disaster impacted elucidation of low level radiation damage to human health. It can be as- sumed that not all scientific elaborations were realized to a proper degree (the use of iodine prophylaxis, radioprotectors). It was associated with impoper fulfillment of instructions by executive organs of radiation safety and medical emergency aid. However, the stationary medical treatment of patients with acute radiation disease was well organized. Insufficient consideration was given to non- radiological factors having an effect or,the psycho-emotional state of the people. Harmful effects of small doses on human health were not be found. The adverse delayed consequences (thyroid cancer, leucosis, and solid cancers) were found in the case of exceeding dose limit of 250 mGy. The upper border of low harmless.radiation doses could not be detected in those studies because of poor radiation dosimetry of liquidators, inadequate models of risk evaluation and ignoring influence of non-radiological factors on human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":79368,"journal":{"name":"Radiatsionnaia biologiia, radioecologiia","volume":"56 3","pages":"274-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Chernobyl Disaster Consequences from the -Distance of 30 Years].\",\"authors\":\"L M Rozhdestvensky\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are 2 most important questions regarding studies of the Chernobyl disaster: to what degree the opportunities to decrease injuries of the people affected by the disaster were realized and how the study of the con- sequences of the disaster impacted elucidation of low level radiation damage to human health. It can be as- sumed that not all scientific elaborations were realized to a proper degree (the use of iodine prophylaxis, radioprotectors). It was associated with impoper fulfillment of instructions by executive organs of radiation safety and medical emergency aid. However, the stationary medical treatment of patients with acute radiation disease was well organized. Insufficient consideration was given to non- radiological factors having an effect or,the psycho-emotional state of the people. Harmful effects of small doses on human health were not be found. The adverse delayed consequences (thyroid cancer, leucosis, and solid cancers) were found in the case of exceeding dose limit of 250 mGy. The upper border of low harmless.radiation doses could not be detected in those studies because of poor radiation dosimetry of liquidators, inadequate models of risk evaluation and ignoring influence of non-radiological factors on human health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiatsionnaia biologiia, radioecologiia\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"274-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiatsionnaia biologiia, radioecologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiatsionnaia biologiia, radioecologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于切尔诺贝利灾难的研究有两个最重要的问题:在多大程度上实现了减少受灾难影响的人受伤的机会,以及对灾难后果的研究如何影响了对低水平辐射对人类健康损害的阐明。可以认为,并非所有的科学阐述都得到了适当的实现(碘预防的使用,辐射防护剂)。这与执行机关对辐射安全和医疗紧急援助的指示执行不力有关。然而,急性放射病患者的固定医疗组织良好。没有充分考虑到非放射因素对人的心理情绪状态有影响。没有发现小剂量对人体健康的有害影响。在超过250毫戈瑞剂量限制的情况下,发现了不良的延迟后果(甲状腺癌、白血病和实体癌)。上边界低无害。在这些研究中,由于清理者的辐射剂量测定方法不完善、风险评估模型不完善以及忽视了非辐射因素对人类健康的影响,无法检测到辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Chernobyl Disaster Consequences from the -Distance of 30 Years].

There are 2 most important questions regarding studies of the Chernobyl disaster: to what degree the opportunities to decrease injuries of the people affected by the disaster were realized and how the study of the con- sequences of the disaster impacted elucidation of low level radiation damage to human health. It can be as- sumed that not all scientific elaborations were realized to a proper degree (the use of iodine prophylaxis, radioprotectors). It was associated with impoper fulfillment of instructions by executive organs of radiation safety and medical emergency aid. However, the stationary medical treatment of patients with acute radiation disease was well organized. Insufficient consideration was given to non- radiological factors having an effect or,the psycho-emotional state of the people. Harmful effects of small doses on human health were not be found. The adverse delayed consequences (thyroid cancer, leucosis, and solid cancers) were found in the case of exceeding dose limit of 250 mGy. The upper border of low harmless.radiation doses could not be detected in those studies because of poor radiation dosimetry of liquidators, inadequate models of risk evaluation and ignoring influence of non-radiological factors on human health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信