退伍军人事务经导管主动脉瓣置换术的演变:前100名患者。

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Heart Valve Disease Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Joseph Yang, Jeffrey M Zimmet, Vimala M Ponna, Frank Ma, Curtis J Wozniak, Liang Ge, Kendrick A Shunk, Elaine E Tseng
{"title":"退伍军人事务经导管主动脉瓣置换术的演变:前100名患者。","authors":"Joseph Yang,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Zimmet,&nbsp;Vimala M Ponna,&nbsp;Frank Ma,&nbsp;Curtis J Wozniak,&nbsp;Liang Ge,&nbsp;Kendrick A Shunk,&nbsp;Elaine E Tseng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a widely established alternative to surgery in intermediate- and high-risk patients. TAVR program development within the Veterans Affairs (VA) system has been previously described. However, national TAVR registries do not capture VA outcomes data, and few data have been reported regarding TAVR outcomes at lower-volume federal institutions. The study aim was to demonstrate the evolution of a successful VA TAVR program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed of the first 100 TAVR patients at San Francisco VA Medical Center. Mortality and major complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 25th November 2013 and 31st August 2016, a total of 100 TAVR procedures was performed at the authors' institution. The mean patient age was 79.7 ± 8.7 years. Patients underwent TAVR via percutaneous-transfemoral (n = 90), surgical cutdown-transfemoral (n = 8), or transapical (n = 2) approaches. The valve systems employed were Edwards SAPIEN (n = 16), SAPIEN XT (n = 31), SAPIEN 3 (n = 23), and Medtronic CoreValve (n = 16) and CoreValve Evolut R (n = 14). The overall device success was 96%. TAVR-in-TAVR was required in the remaining 4% of patients, and was successful. All-cause procedural mortality was 1%. Complications included tamponade (1%), stroke (2%), temporary hemodialysis (1%), vascular injuries requiring intervention (4%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (14%). There were no conversions to surgical aortic valve replacement. Twenty-two (22%) patients had mild, two (2%) had moderate, and none (0%) had severe paravalvular leakage. The post-procedure aortic valve gradient by echocardiography was 8.6 ± 4.5 mmHg. Follow up was 100% complete and survival was 99%, 93%, and 89% at one, six, and 12 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful outcomes were demonstrated for a VA TAVR program that compared favorably with benchmarks established by the National Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry. These results provide a necessary transparency of TAVR outcomes at a federal institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart Valve Disease","volume":"27 1","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590872/pdf/nihms-1747634.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of Veterans Affairs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Program: The First 100 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Yang,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Zimmet,&nbsp;Vimala M Ponna,&nbsp;Frank Ma,&nbsp;Curtis J Wozniak,&nbsp;Liang Ge,&nbsp;Kendrick A Shunk,&nbsp;Elaine E Tseng\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a widely established alternative to surgery in intermediate- and high-risk patients. TAVR program development within the Veterans Affairs (VA) system has been previously described. However, national TAVR registries do not capture VA outcomes data, and few data have been reported regarding TAVR outcomes at lower-volume federal institutions. The study aim was to demonstrate the evolution of a successful VA TAVR program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed of the first 100 TAVR patients at San Francisco VA Medical Center. Mortality and major complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 25th November 2013 and 31st August 2016, a total of 100 TAVR procedures was performed at the authors' institution. The mean patient age was 79.7 ± 8.7 years. Patients underwent TAVR via percutaneous-transfemoral (n = 90), surgical cutdown-transfemoral (n = 8), or transapical (n = 2) approaches. The valve systems employed were Edwards SAPIEN (n = 16), SAPIEN XT (n = 31), SAPIEN 3 (n = 23), and Medtronic CoreValve (n = 16) and CoreValve Evolut R (n = 14). The overall device success was 96%. TAVR-in-TAVR was required in the remaining 4% of patients, and was successful. All-cause procedural mortality was 1%. Complications included tamponade (1%), stroke (2%), temporary hemodialysis (1%), vascular injuries requiring intervention (4%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (14%). There were no conversions to surgical aortic valve replacement. Twenty-two (22%) patients had mild, two (2%) had moderate, and none (0%) had severe paravalvular leakage. The post-procedure aortic valve gradient by echocardiography was 8.6 ± 4.5 mmHg. Follow up was 100% complete and survival was 99%, 93%, and 89% at one, six, and 12 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful outcomes were demonstrated for a VA TAVR program that compared favorably with benchmarks established by the National Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry. These results provide a necessary transparency of TAVR outcomes at a federal institution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart Valve Disease\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"24-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590872/pdf/nihms-1747634.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart Valve Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart Valve Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是一种广泛建立的替代手术的中高危患者。TAVR项目在退伍军人事务(VA)系统内的发展已经在前面描述过。然而,国家TAVR登记处没有捕获VA结果数据,并且很少有关于低容量联邦机构TAVR结果的数据报道。研究的目的是展示一个成功的VA TAVR计划的演变。方法:对旧金山VA医疗中心前100例TAVR患者进行回顾性分析。评估死亡率和主要并发症。结果:2013年11月25日至2016年8月31日期间,作者所在机构共进行了100例TAVR手术。患者平均年龄79.7±8.7岁。患者通过经皮经股(n = 90)、经股(n = 8)或经根尖(n = 2)入路行TAVR。采用的瓣膜系统为Edwards SAPIEN (n = 16)、SAPIEN XT (n = 31)、SAPIEN 3 (n = 23)、Medtronic CoreValve (n = 16)和CoreValve Evolut R (n = 14)。整个装置的成功率为96%。其余4%的患者需要TAVR-in-TAVR治疗,并取得了成功。全因程序性死亡率为1%。并发症包括填塞(1%)、中风(2%)、暂时性血液透析(1%)、需要干预的血管损伤(4%)和永久性起搏器植入(14%)。没有转到手术主动脉瓣置换术。22例(22%)为轻度,2例(2%)为中度,无一例(0%)为重度瓣旁漏。术后超声心动图主动脉瓣梯度8.6±4.5 mmHg。随访100%完成,1个月、6个月和12个月生存率分别为99%、93%和89%。结论:与国家经导管瓣膜治疗登记处建立的基准相比,VA TAVR项目的成功结果被证明是有利的。这些结果为联邦机构的TAVR结果提供了必要的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution of Veterans Affairs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Program: The First 100 Patients.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a widely established alternative to surgery in intermediate- and high-risk patients. TAVR program development within the Veterans Affairs (VA) system has been previously described. However, national TAVR registries do not capture VA outcomes data, and few data have been reported regarding TAVR outcomes at lower-volume federal institutions. The study aim was to demonstrate the evolution of a successful VA TAVR program.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of the first 100 TAVR patients at San Francisco VA Medical Center. Mortality and major complications were evaluated.

Results: Between 25th November 2013 and 31st August 2016, a total of 100 TAVR procedures was performed at the authors' institution. The mean patient age was 79.7 ± 8.7 years. Patients underwent TAVR via percutaneous-transfemoral (n = 90), surgical cutdown-transfemoral (n = 8), or transapical (n = 2) approaches. The valve systems employed were Edwards SAPIEN (n = 16), SAPIEN XT (n = 31), SAPIEN 3 (n = 23), and Medtronic CoreValve (n = 16) and CoreValve Evolut R (n = 14). The overall device success was 96%. TAVR-in-TAVR was required in the remaining 4% of patients, and was successful. All-cause procedural mortality was 1%. Complications included tamponade (1%), stroke (2%), temporary hemodialysis (1%), vascular injuries requiring intervention (4%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (14%). There were no conversions to surgical aortic valve replacement. Twenty-two (22%) patients had mild, two (2%) had moderate, and none (0%) had severe paravalvular leakage. The post-procedure aortic valve gradient by echocardiography was 8.6 ± 4.5 mmHg. Follow up was 100% complete and survival was 99%, 93%, and 89% at one, six, and 12 months, respectively.

Conclusions: Successful outcomes were demonstrated for a VA TAVR program that compared favorably with benchmarks established by the National Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry. These results provide a necessary transparency of TAVR outcomes at a federal institution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Heart Valve Disease
Journal of Heart Valve Disease 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart Valve Disease (ISSN 0966-8519) is the official journal of The Society for Heart Valve Disease. It is indexed/abstracted by Index Medicus, Medline, Medlar, PubMed, Science Citation Index, Scisearch, Research Alert, Biomedical Products, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine. It is issued bi-monthly in one indexed volume by ICR Publishers Ltd., Crispin House, 12A South Approach, Moor Park, Northwood HA6 2ET, United Kingdom. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI standard Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信