影响急性姑息/支持性护理单位出院后临床和设置路径的因素。

Sebastiano Mercadante, Claudio Adile, Patrizia Ferrera, Alessandra Casuccio
{"title":"影响急性姑息/支持性护理单位出院后临床和设置路径的因素。","authors":"Sebastiano Mercadante,&nbsp;Claudio Adile,&nbsp;Patrizia Ferrera,&nbsp;Alessandra Casuccio","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000000510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the factors which influence the care pathway after discharge from an acute palliative supportive care unit (APSCU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients' demographics, indications for admission, kind of admission, the presence of a caregiver, awareness of prognosis, data on anticancer treatments in the last 30 days, ongoing treatment (on/off or uncertain), the previous care setting, analgesic consumption, and duration of admission were recorded. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at admission and at time of discharge (or the day before death), CAGE (cut down, annoy, guilt, eye-opener), and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), were used. At time of discharge, the subsequent referral to other care settings (death, home, home care, hospice, oncology), and the pathway of oncologic treatment were reconsidered (on/off, uncertain).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 314 consecutive cancer patients admitted to the APSCU were surveyed. Factors independently associated with on-therapy were the lack of a caregiver, home discharge, and short hospital admission, in comparison with off-treatment, and less admission for other symptoms, shorter hospital admission, discharge at home, and better well-being, when compared with \"uncertain.\" Similarly, many factors were associated with discharge setting, but the only factor independently associated with discharge home was being \"on-therapy.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding of this study is consistent with an appropriate selection of patients after being discharged by an APSCU, that works as a bridge between active treatments and supportive/palliative care, according the concept of early and simultaneous care.</p>","PeriodicalId":501816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"265-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000510","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Clinical and Setting Pathways After Discharge From an Acute Palliative/Supportive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastiano Mercadante,&nbsp;Claudio Adile,&nbsp;Patrizia Ferrera,&nbsp;Alessandra Casuccio\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COC.0000000000000510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the factors which influence the care pathway after discharge from an acute palliative supportive care unit (APSCU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients' demographics, indications for admission, kind of admission, the presence of a caregiver, awareness of prognosis, data on anticancer treatments in the last 30 days, ongoing treatment (on/off or uncertain), the previous care setting, analgesic consumption, and duration of admission were recorded. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at admission and at time of discharge (or the day before death), CAGE (cut down, annoy, guilt, eye-opener), and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), were used. At time of discharge, the subsequent referral to other care settings (death, home, home care, hospice, oncology), and the pathway of oncologic treatment were reconsidered (on/off, uncertain).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 314 consecutive cancer patients admitted to the APSCU were surveyed. Factors independently associated with on-therapy were the lack of a caregiver, home discharge, and short hospital admission, in comparison with off-treatment, and less admission for other symptoms, shorter hospital admission, discharge at home, and better well-being, when compared with \\\"uncertain.\\\" Similarly, many factors were associated with discharge setting, but the only factor independently associated with discharge home was being \\\"on-therapy.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding of this study is consistent with an appropriate selection of patients after being discharged by an APSCU, that works as a bridge between active treatments and supportive/palliative care, according the concept of early and simultaneous care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"265-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/COC.0000000000000510\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估影响急性姑息治疗支持病房(APSCU)出院后护理途径的因素。方法:记录患者的人口统计学特征、入院适应症、入院类型、是否有护理人员、预后意识、近30天抗癌治疗数据、正在进行的治疗(开/关或不确定)、既往护理环境、镇痛药使用情况和住院时间。采用入院和出院时(或死亡前一天)埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)、CAGE (cut down、annoy、guilt、opener)和纪念性谵妄评估量表(MDAS)。出院时,重新考虑后续转诊到其他护理机构(死亡、家庭、家庭护理、临终关怀、肿瘤治疗)和肿瘤治疗途径(开/关,不确定)。结果:共调查了314例连续入住APSCU的癌症患者。与接受治疗相关的独立因素是:与不接受治疗相比,缺乏护理人员、出院回家、住院时间短;与“不确定”相比,其他症状入院次数少、住院时间短、出院在家、健康状况更好。同样,许多因素与出院环境有关,但唯一与出院家庭独立相关的因素是“正在接受治疗”。结论:本研究的发现与APSCU出院后患者的适当选择是一致的,根据早期和同步护理的概念,APSCU作为积极治疗和支持/姑息治疗之间的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing Clinical and Setting Pathways After Discharge From an Acute Palliative/Supportive Care Unit.

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the factors which influence the care pathway after discharge from an acute palliative supportive care unit (APSCU).

Methods: Patients' demographics, indications for admission, kind of admission, the presence of a caregiver, awareness of prognosis, data on anticancer treatments in the last 30 days, ongoing treatment (on/off or uncertain), the previous care setting, analgesic consumption, and duration of admission were recorded. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at admission and at time of discharge (or the day before death), CAGE (cut down, annoy, guilt, eye-opener), and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), were used. At time of discharge, the subsequent referral to other care settings (death, home, home care, hospice, oncology), and the pathway of oncologic treatment were reconsidered (on/off, uncertain).

Results: A total of 314 consecutive cancer patients admitted to the APSCU were surveyed. Factors independently associated with on-therapy were the lack of a caregiver, home discharge, and short hospital admission, in comparison with off-treatment, and less admission for other symptoms, shorter hospital admission, discharge at home, and better well-being, when compared with "uncertain." Similarly, many factors were associated with discharge setting, but the only factor independently associated with discharge home was being "on-therapy."

Conclusions: The finding of this study is consistent with an appropriate selection of patients after being discharged by an APSCU, that works as a bridge between active treatments and supportive/palliative care, according the concept of early and simultaneous care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信