脐带和羊膜间充质间质细胞在无氧条件下的比较评价。

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Yongxu Mu, Xiaoyun Wu, Zhiming Hao
{"title":"脐带和羊膜间充质间质细胞在无氧条件下的比较评价。","authors":"Yongxu Mu,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Wu,&nbsp;Zhiming Hao","doi":"10.1186/s12860-018-0178-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within the past years, umbilical cord (UC) and amniotic membrane (AM) expanded in human platelet lysate (PL) have been found to become increasingly candidate of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in preclinical and clinical studies. Different sources of MSCs have different properties, and lead to different therapeutic applications. However, the similarity and differences between the AMMSCs and UCMSCs in PL remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we conduct a direct head-to-head comparison with regard to biological characteristics (morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential) and immunosuppression effects of AMMSCs and UCMSCs expanded in PL. Our results indicated that AMMSCs showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, proliferative capacity and colony efficiency with UCMSCs. Moreover, no significantly differences in osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential were observed between the two types of cells. However, AMMSCs exhibited higher PGE<sub>2</sub> expression and IDO activity compared with UCMSCs when primed by IFN-γ and (or) TNF-α induction, and AMMSCs showed a higher inhibitory effect on PBMCs proliferation than UCMSCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that AMMSCs expanded in PL showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential with UCMSCs. However, AMMSCs possessed superior immunosuppression effects in comparison with UCMSCs. These results suggest that AMMSCs in PL might be more suitable than UCMSCs for treatment of immune diseases. This work provides a novel insight into choosing the appropriate source of MSCs for treatment of immune diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9051,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cell Biology","volume":" ","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12860-018-0178-8","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord and amniotic membrane in xeno-free conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Yongxu Mu,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Wu,&nbsp;Zhiming Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12860-018-0178-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within the past years, umbilical cord (UC) and amniotic membrane (AM) expanded in human platelet lysate (PL) have been found to become increasingly candidate of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in preclinical and clinical studies. Different sources of MSCs have different properties, and lead to different therapeutic applications. However, the similarity and differences between the AMMSCs and UCMSCs in PL remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we conduct a direct head-to-head comparison with regard to biological characteristics (morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential) and immunosuppression effects of AMMSCs and UCMSCs expanded in PL. Our results indicated that AMMSCs showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, proliferative capacity and colony efficiency with UCMSCs. Moreover, no significantly differences in osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential were observed between the two types of cells. However, AMMSCs exhibited higher PGE<sub>2</sub> expression and IDO activity compared with UCMSCs when primed by IFN-γ and (or) TNF-α induction, and AMMSCs showed a higher inhibitory effect on PBMCs proliferation than UCMSCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that AMMSCs expanded in PL showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential with UCMSCs. However, AMMSCs possessed superior immunosuppression effects in comparison with UCMSCs. These results suggest that AMMSCs in PL might be more suitable than UCMSCs for treatment of immune diseases. This work provides a novel insight into choosing the appropriate source of MSCs for treatment of immune diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cell Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12860-018-0178-8\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cell Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-018-0178-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-018-0178-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:近年来,在临床前和临床研究中发现,脐带(UC)和羊膜(AM)在人血小板裂解液(PL)中扩张,越来越多地成为间充质基质细胞(MSCs)的候选者。不同来源的间充质干细胞具有不同的性质,并导致不同的治疗应用。然而,在PL中,AMMSCs和UCMSCs之间的异同尚不清楚。结果:在本研究中,我们对在PL中扩增的AMMSCs和UCMSCs的生物学特性(形态学、免疫表型、自我更新能力和三龄分化潜能)和免疫抑制作用进行了直接对比。我们的结果表明,AMMSCs与UCMSCs具有相似的形态学、免疫表型、增殖能力和集落效率。此外,两种类型的细胞在成骨、成软骨和成脂肪分化潜能方面没有明显差异。然而,在IFN-γ和(或)TNF-α诱导下,与UCMSCs相比,AMMSCs表现出更高的PGE2表达和IDO活性,并且AMMSCs对PBMCs增殖的抑制作用高于UCMSCs。结论:在PL中扩增的AMMSCs具有与UCMSCs相似的形态、免疫表型、自我更新能力和三期分化潜力。然而,与UCMSCs相比,AMMSCs具有更好的免疫抑制作用。这些结果表明,与UCMSCs相比,PL中的AMMSCs可能更适合于免疫疾病的治疗。这项工作为选择合适的间充质干细胞来源治疗免疫疾病提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord and amniotic membrane in xeno-free conditions.

Comparative evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord and amniotic membrane in xeno-free conditions.

Comparative evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord and amniotic membrane in xeno-free conditions.

Comparative evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord and amniotic membrane in xeno-free conditions.

Background: Within the past years, umbilical cord (UC) and amniotic membrane (AM) expanded in human platelet lysate (PL) have been found to become increasingly candidate of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in preclinical and clinical studies. Different sources of MSCs have different properties, and lead to different therapeutic applications. However, the similarity and differences between the AMMSCs and UCMSCs in PL remain unclear.

Results: In this study, we conduct a direct head-to-head comparison with regard to biological characteristics (morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential) and immunosuppression effects of AMMSCs and UCMSCs expanded in PL. Our results indicated that AMMSCs showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, proliferative capacity and colony efficiency with UCMSCs. Moreover, no significantly differences in osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential were observed between the two types of cells. However, AMMSCs exhibited higher PGE2 expression and IDO activity compared with UCMSCs when primed by IFN-γ and (or) TNF-α induction, and AMMSCs showed a higher inhibitory effect on PBMCs proliferation than UCMSCs.

Conclusion: The results suggest that AMMSCs expanded in PL showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential with UCMSCs. However, AMMSCs possessed superior immunosuppression effects in comparison with UCMSCs. These results suggest that AMMSCs in PL might be more suitable than UCMSCs for treatment of immune diseases. This work provides a novel insight into choosing the appropriate source of MSCs for treatment of immune diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cell Biology
BMC Cell Biology 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, formerly known as BMC Cell Biology, is an open access journal that considers articles on all aspects of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cell and molecular biology, including structural and functional cell biology, DNA and RNA in a cellular context and biochemistry, as well as research using both the experimental and theoretical aspects of physics to study biological processes and investigations into the structure of biological macromolecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信