全科医生对初级卫生保健护理协调的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
International Journal of Care Coordination Pub Date : 2018-12-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-14 DOI:10.1177/2053434518816792
Ane Drougge Vassbotn, Hege Sjøvik, Trond Tjerbo, Jan Frich, Ivan Spehar
{"title":"全科医生对初级卫生保健护理协调的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Ane Drougge Vassbotn,&nbsp;Hege Sjøvik,&nbsp;Trond Tjerbo,&nbsp;Jan Frich,&nbsp;Ivan Spehar","doi":"10.1177/2053434518816792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To explore Norwegian general practitioners' experiences with care coordination in primary health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative study using data from five focus groups with 32 general practitioners in Norway. We analysed the data using systematic text condensation, a descriptive and explorative method for thematic cross-case analysis of qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The general practitioners had different notions of care pathways. They expressed a wish and an obligation to be involved in planning and coordination of primary health-care services, but they experienced organisational and financial barriers that limited their involvement and contribution. General practitioners reported lack of information about and few opportunities for involvement in formal coordination initiatives, and they missed informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals. They argued that the general practitioner's role as coordinator should be recognised by other parties and that they needed financial compensation for contributions and attendance in meetings with the municipality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>General practitioners need informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals and access to relevant information to promote coordinated care. There might be an untapped potential for improving patient care involving general practitioners more in planning and coordinating services at the system level. Financial compensation of general practitioners contribution may promote increased involvement by general practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2053434518816792","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General practitioners' perspectives on care coordination in primary health care: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Ane Drougge Vassbotn,&nbsp;Hege Sjøvik,&nbsp;Trond Tjerbo,&nbsp;Jan Frich,&nbsp;Ivan Spehar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2053434518816792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To explore Norwegian general practitioners' experiences with care coordination in primary health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative study using data from five focus groups with 32 general practitioners in Norway. We analysed the data using systematic text condensation, a descriptive and explorative method for thematic cross-case analysis of qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The general practitioners had different notions of care pathways. They expressed a wish and an obligation to be involved in planning and coordination of primary health-care services, but they experienced organisational and financial barriers that limited their involvement and contribution. General practitioners reported lack of information about and few opportunities for involvement in formal coordination initiatives, and they missed informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals. They argued that the general practitioner's role as coordinator should be recognised by other parties and that they needed financial compensation for contributions and attendance in meetings with the municipality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>General practitioners need informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals and access to relevant information to promote coordinated care. There might be an untapped potential for improving patient care involving general practitioners more in planning and coordinating services at the system level. Financial compensation of general practitioners contribution may promote increased involvement by general practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Care Coordination\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2053434518816792\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Care Coordination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434518816792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434518816792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

前言:探讨挪威全科医生在初级卫生保健护理协调方面的经验。方法:定性研究使用来自挪威5个焦点小组的32名全科医生的数据。我们使用系统的文本浓缩分析数据,这是一种描述性和探索性的方法,用于定性数据的专题跨案例分析。结果:全科医生对护理路径的认识存在差异。他们表示希望并有义务参与初级保健服务的规划和协调,但他们遇到了组织和财政障碍,限制了他们的参与和贡献。全科医生报告说,他们缺乏关于正式协调倡议的信息,参与的机会也很少,而且他们错过了与其他初级保健专业人员进行对话的非正式场所。他们认为,全科医生作为协调者的角色应该得到其他各方的认可,他们需要对贡献和出席市政当局会议给予经济补偿。讨论:全科医生需要非正式场所与其他初级保健专业人员进行对话,并获得相关信息,以促进协调一致的护理。让全科医生更多地参与系统层面的规划和协调服务,改善患者护理可能存在未开发的潜力。全科医生贡献的经济补偿可能会促进全科医生的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
General practitioners' perspectives on care coordination in primary health care: A qualitative study.

Introduction: To explore Norwegian general practitioners' experiences with care coordination in primary health care.

Methods: Qualitative study using data from five focus groups with 32 general practitioners in Norway. We analysed the data using systematic text condensation, a descriptive and explorative method for thematic cross-case analysis of qualitative data.

Results: The general practitioners had different notions of care pathways. They expressed a wish and an obligation to be involved in planning and coordination of primary health-care services, but they experienced organisational and financial barriers that limited their involvement and contribution. General practitioners reported lack of information about and few opportunities for involvement in formal coordination initiatives, and they missed informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals. They argued that the general practitioner's role as coordinator should be recognised by other parties and that they needed financial compensation for contributions and attendance in meetings with the municipality.

Discussion: General practitioners need informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals and access to relevant information to promote coordinated care. There might be an untapped potential for improving patient care involving general practitioners more in planning and coordinating services at the system level. Financial compensation of general practitioners contribution may promote increased involvement by general practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信