利用旋转血栓弹性测量法(ROTEM)研究动物和人体内物种特异性凝血差异。

Q2 Medicine
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps Pub Date : 2019-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-19 DOI:10.1136/jramc-2018-001092
Raimund Lechner, M Helm, M Müller, T Wille, H J Riesner, B Friemert
{"title":"利用旋转血栓弹性测量法(ROTEM)研究动物和人体内物种特异性凝血差异。","authors":"Raimund Lechner,&nbsp;M Helm,&nbsp;M Müller,&nbsp;T Wille,&nbsp;H J Riesner,&nbsp;B Friemert","doi":"10.1136/jramc-2018-001092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal tests are conducted in all fields of trauma research, but transferability of these data to humans is limited. For example, it is still unclear which animal species is most similar to humans in terms of physiology of blood coagulation. To improve transferability and raise awareness of the existing differences, we compared human coagulation to coagulation of different animals. Rotational thromboelastometry was used to analyse the blood of pigs, sheep, rabbits and dogs. Animal data were compared with human coagulation based on the number of significant differences of the test parameters and on a descriptive comparison of the extent of relative deviation of the single values. All animal species showed significant differences in coagulation properties when compared with humans. Coagulation parameters of dogs and sheep were on average most similar to humans. However, there is no animal which is most similar to humans concerning all aspects of coagulation. Differences in coagulation between humans and animals are significant. This must be taken into account when transferring animal test data to humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":17327,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","volume":"165 5","pages":"356-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jramc-2018-001092","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-vitro study of species-specific coagulation differences in animals and humans using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).\",\"authors\":\"Raimund Lechner,&nbsp;M Helm,&nbsp;M Müller,&nbsp;T Wille,&nbsp;H J Riesner,&nbsp;B Friemert\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jramc-2018-001092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Animal tests are conducted in all fields of trauma research, but transferability of these data to humans is limited. For example, it is still unclear which animal species is most similar to humans in terms of physiology of blood coagulation. To improve transferability and raise awareness of the existing differences, we compared human coagulation to coagulation of different animals. Rotational thromboelastometry was used to analyse the blood of pigs, sheep, rabbits and dogs. Animal data were compared with human coagulation based on the number of significant differences of the test parameters and on a descriptive comparison of the extent of relative deviation of the single values. All animal species showed significant differences in coagulation properties when compared with humans. Coagulation parameters of dogs and sheep were on average most similar to humans. However, there is no animal which is most similar to humans concerning all aspects of coagulation. Differences in coagulation between humans and animals are significant. This must be taken into account when transferring animal test data to humans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps\",\"volume\":\"165 5\",\"pages\":\"356-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jramc-2018-001092\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2018-001092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2018-001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在创伤研究的所有领域都进行了动物试验,但这些数据对人类的可转移性有限。例如,目前尚不清楚哪种动物在凝血生理学方面与人类最相似。为了提高可转移性和提高对存在差异的认识,我们将人凝血与不同动物的凝血进行了比较。采用旋转血栓弹性测定法分析猪、羊、兔和狗的血液。根据试验参数显著差异的数量和单个值相对偏差程度的描述性比较,将动物数据与人凝血试验进行比较。与人类相比,所有动物的凝血特性都有显著差异。狗和羊的凝血参数平均与人类最相似。然而,在凝血的各个方面,没有一种动物与人类最相似。人和动物在凝血方面的差异是显著的。在将动物试验数据转移给人类时,必须考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-vitro study of species-specific coagulation differences in animals and humans using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).

Animal tests are conducted in all fields of trauma research, but transferability of these data to humans is limited. For example, it is still unclear which animal species is most similar to humans in terms of physiology of blood coagulation. To improve transferability and raise awareness of the existing differences, we compared human coagulation to coagulation of different animals. Rotational thromboelastometry was used to analyse the blood of pigs, sheep, rabbits and dogs. Animal data were compared with human coagulation based on the number of significant differences of the test parameters and on a descriptive comparison of the extent of relative deviation of the single values. All animal species showed significant differences in coagulation properties when compared with humans. Coagulation parameters of dogs and sheep were on average most similar to humans. However, there is no animal which is most similar to humans concerning all aspects of coagulation. Differences in coagulation between humans and animals are significant. This must be taken into account when transferring animal test data to humans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps aims to publish high quality research, reviews and case reports, as well as other invited articles, which pertain to the practice of military medicine in its broadest sense. It welcomes material from all ranks, services and corps wherever they serve as well as submissions from beyond the military. It is intended not only to propagate current knowledge and expertise but also to act as an institutional memory for the practice of medicine within the military.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信